TAKING DISABILITY SERIOUSLY ON THE FEMINIST DISABILITY STUDIES CRITIC TO THE MAINSTREAM FEMINISM

Authors

  • Maria Giulia Bernardini Università di Ferrara

Keywords:

Feminist Disability Studies, care, disability, vulnerability, dependency

Abstract

The discipline of Feminist Disability Studies (FDS) emerges in the mid-Eighties as a critique of both Feminist and Disability Studies, considered “guilty” of excluding women with disabilities from their theorization and, therefore, incapable to represent them as subjects. After a brief analysis of the similarities and the differences between the conditions of oppression experienced by people with disabilities and women, in this paper I first analyse some of the reasons that may be present behind the silence of Feminism on disability, then I show the importance of FDS for the feminist inquiry. Finally, I conclude by focusing on a recent and interesting point of convergence between Feminism and FDS, namely, the theme of vulnerability and dependency

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braswell Harold (2014), “My two Moms: Disability, Queer Kinship, and the Maternal Subject”, Hypatia, 30, 234-250.

Butler Judith (2004), Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

Butler Judith (2009), Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?. London: Verso.

Carlson Licia (2001), “Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies: Feminist Reflections on the History of Mental Retardation”, Hypatia, 16, 124-146.

Carlson Licia, Kittay Eva Feder eds. (2010), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.

Casalini Brunella (2010), “Migrazioni femminili, controllo dei confini e nuove schiavitù”, Ragion Pratica, 35, 455-468.

Casalini Brunella, Cini Lorenzo (2012), Giustizia, uguaglianza e differenza. Una guida alla lettura della filosofia politica contemporanea. Firenze: Firenze University Press.

Cavarero Adriana (2013), Inclinazioni. Critica della rettitudine. Milano: Cortina.

Crow Liz (1996), Including all of our Lives: renewing the Social Model of Disability, in Barnes Colin, Mercer Geof eds., Exploring the Divide. Leeds: The Disability Press, 55-72.

Dale Stone Sharon (1995), “The Myth of Bodily Perfection”, Disability & Society, 10, 413-424.

Dalley Gillian (1988), Ideologies of Caring: Rethinking Community and Collectivism. London: The Macmillan Press.

Fine Michelle, Asch Adrienne eds. (1998), Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Fineman Martha, Grear Anna eds. (2014), Vulnerability. Reflections on a new Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

French Sally (1993), Setting a Record Straight, in Swain John et al. eds., Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments. London: Sage, 227-232.

Garland Thomson Rosmarie (2002), “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory”, NWSA Journal, 14, 1-32.

Garland Thomson Rosmarie (2006), “Ways of Staring”, Journal of Visual Culture, 5, 173-192.

Garland Thomson Rosmarie (2011), “Misfit: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept”, Hypatia, 26, 591-609.

Giolo Orsetta (2012), Le "periferie" del patriarcato. L'uguaglianza, i diritti umani e le donne, in Casadei Thomas eds., Diritti umani e soggetti vulnerabili. Violazioni, trasformazioni, aporie. Torino: Giappichelli, 119-142.

Goodin Robert E. (1985), Protecting the vulnerable. A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hall Kim Q. (2014), “New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies: Feminism, Philosophy, and Borders”, Hypatia, 30, 1-12.

Hall Kim Q. eds. (2011), Feminist Disability Studies. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Hillyer Davis Barbara (1984), “Women, Disability, and Feminism: Notes Toward a New Theory”, Frontiers, 7, 1-5.

Hubbard Ruth (2013), Abortion and Disability: Who should and should not inhabit the world?, in Davis Lennard eds., The Disability Studies Reader, 4th ed.. New York: Routledge, 74-86.

Jones Melinda (2011), Valuing all lives – even “wrongful” ones, in Rioux Marcia et al. eds., Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Laws, Leiden-Boston: Nijhoff Publishers, 87-116.

Kallianes Virginia, Rubenfeld Phyllis (1997), “Disabled Women and Reproductive Rights”, Disability & Society, 12(2), 203-222.

Kittay Eva Feder (1998), Love’s Labor: Essays on Women Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.

Kittay Eva Feder (2009), “The Moral Harm of Migrant Carework: Realizing a Global Right to Care”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 46, 53-73

Kittay Eva Feder (2011), “The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability”, Ratio Juris, 24, 49-58.

Kittay Eva Feder (2015), Dependency, in Adams Rachel et al. eds., Keywords in Disability Studies. New York: New York University Press, 55-58.

Kuttai Heather (2010), Maternity Rolls: Pregnancy, Childbirth and Disability. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

MacIntyre Alsdair (1999), Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court.

Mackenzie Catriona et al. eds. (2014), Vulnerability. New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

McKay-Moffat Stella Frances ed. (2007), Disability in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Churchill Livingstone.

Morris Jenny (1991), Pride against Prejudice. A Personal Politics of Disability. London: The Women’s Press.

Morris Jenny (1996), Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability. London: Women’s Press.

Morris Jenny (1997), “Care or Empowerment? A Disability Rights Perspective”, Social Policy & Administration, 31, 54-60.

Mykitiuk Roxanne, Chadha Ena (2011), Sites of Exclusion: Disabled Women’s Sexual, Reproductive and Parenting Rights, in Rioux Marcia et al. eds., Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Laws, Leiden-Boston: Nijhoff Publishers, 157-200.

Nussbaum Martha (2006), Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum Martha (2010), The Capabilities of People with Cognitive Disabilities, in Carlson Licia, Kittay Eva Feder eds., Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, Wiley-Blackwell, 75-96.

Oliver Mike (1990), The Politics of Disablement, London: The MacMillan Press.

Ralston D. Christopher, Ho Justin (2009), Introduction: Philosophical Reflections on Disability, in Ralston D. Christopher, Ho Justin eds. Philosophical Reflections on Disability, Dordrecht: Springer, 1-16.

Rawls John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rawls John (1993), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

Richardson Genevra, Involuntary Treatment, Human Dignity and Human Rights, in Rioux Marcia et al. eds., Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Laws, Leiden-Boston: Nijhoff Publishers, 137-156.

Rioux Marcia and Patton Lora (2011), Beyond Legal Smokescreens: Applying a Human Rights Analysis to Sterilization Jurisprudence, in Rioux Marcia et al. eds., Critical Perspectives on Human Rights and Disability Laws, Leiden-Boston: Nijhoff Publishers, 243-272.

Sandel Michael (2007), The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering, Cambridge: Harvard UP.

Savulescu Julian (2001), “Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children”, Bioethics, 15, 413-426.

Sciurba Alessandra (2015), La cura servile, la cura che serve, Pisa: Pacini Editore.

Silvers Anita (1998), “Reprising Women’s Disability: Feminist Identity Strategy and Disability Rights”, Berkeley Women’s L. J., 81, 81-116.

Silvers Anita (Spring 2015 Edition), “Feminist Perspectives on Disability”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Spelman Elisabeth (1990), Inessential Woman, London: The Women’s Press.

tenBrock Jacobus (1966), “The Right to live in the World: The Disabled in the Law of Torts”, Cal. L. Rev., 54, 841-858.

Thomas Carol (2004), Disability and impairment, in Swain John et al. eds., Disabling Barriers. Enabling Environments, London: SAGE, 21-27.

Thomas Carol (1999), Female Forms. Experiencing and understanding disability, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Thomas Carol (2002), The “Disabled” Body, in Evans Mary, Lee Ellies eds., Real Bodies. A Sociological Introduction, Palgrave: Basingstoke, 64-78.

Thomas Carol (2007), Sociologies of Disability and Illness, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Tilley Elizabeth et al. (2012), “The silence is roaring”: sterilization, reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities, in Disability & Society, 27(3), 413-426.

Trent James (1994), Inventing the feeble mind: a history of mental retardation in the United States, Berkeley: University of California Press.

UNESCO 2011, Report of IBC on the Principle of Respect for Human Vulnerability and Personal Integrity.

Wendell Susan (1989), “Toward a feminist theory of disability”, Hypatia, 4, 104-124.

Young Iris Marion (1980), Throwing like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Young Iris Marion (1990), Justice and the politics of difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Published

2015-07-26

How to Cite

BERNARDINI, Maria Giulia. TAKING DISABILITY SERIOUSLY ON THE FEMINIST DISABILITY STUDIES CRITIC TO THE MAINSTREAM FEMINISM. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 4, n. 2, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/25062. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

International Journal

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.