IL SISTEMA DI ASILO EUROPEO E I DIRITTI UMANI DEI RIFUGIATI: VERSO UNA REGRESSIONE?

  • Enzo Rossi University of Rome Tor Vergata - CREG (the Centre for Economic and Legal Research)
  • Paolo Iafrate University of Rome Tor Vergata - CREG (the Centre for Economic and Legal Research)
Palavras-chave: human rights. European Court. asylum

Resumo

The attitude of European states towards asylum seekers is in restraining overall. The review of the European rules on asylum and a brief review of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice, show the human rights violations that have been performed in order to limit the access of asylum seekers in European countries. The recent inflows, deemed exorbitant, resulted, after an attempt to cooperation then in fact failed, in the enactment of more stringent rules with major violations of rights. Finally, the agreement with Turkey marks the partial renunciation by Europe to handle the problem, which is delegated to a country that offers few guarantees of democracy and respect for human rights.

Referências

Bauer, T., Lofstrom, K.M. and Zimmermann K.F.(2000) 'Immigration policy, assimilation of immigrants and natives' sentiment toward immigrants: evidence from 12 OECD-countries', Swedish Economic Policy Review, 7(2), 11-53.

Palladino, R. (2015), ‘Immigrazione e asilo, La ‘derogabilità’ del ‘sistema Dublino’ dell’UE nella sentenza Tarakhel della Corte europea: dalle ‘deficienze sistemiche’ ai ‘seri dubbi sulle attuali capacità del sistema’ italiano di accoglienza’, in I Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale, Società editrice il Mulino, vol. 9, 2015, n. 1, pp. 226-232 , http://www.sidi-isil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Palladino-Rossana.pdf

Barbou Des Places, S. and Deffains, B. (2003) 'Cooperation in the Shadow of Regulatory Competition: The Case of Asylum Legislation in Europe', International Review of Law and Economics 23(4): 345-64.

Fois, F. (2015), ‘La Corte Europea dei Diritti dell’Uomo sanziona i respingimenti verso gli stati con sistemi d’asilo inefficienti: interesse della sentenza tarakhel c. svizzera ai fini di una valutazione sotto questo profilo del sistema cedu e del sistema dublino’, Ordine internazionale e diritti umani, pp. 504-517, http://www.rivistaoidu.net/sites/default/files/5_Fois.pdf

Guild, E.; Costello, C.; Garlick, M.; Moreno-Lax, V. and Mouzourakis M. (2015) 'New Approaches, Alternative Avenues and Means of Access to Asylum Procedures for Persons Seeking International Protection' CEPS paper No. 77, http://www.ceps.eu/publications/new-approaches-alternative-avenues-and-means-access-asylum-procedures-persons-seeking.

Iafrate, P. (2014)“L’istituto della kafalah nell’ordinamento italiano alla luce della giuriprudenza recente” Libertà Civili (Ministero dell’Interno), n. 5/13 pp. 62-67.

Lenart, J. (2012) ‘Fortress Europe’: Compliance of the Dublin II Regulation with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ Merkourios, Volume 28/Issue 75, Article, pp. 04-19.

Oel, M. 'From crisis to structure - CEAS, recent developments and outlook for the future', presented at the Presidency Conference "Managing Asylum Flows: Strengthening the Tools, Strengthening the System", Rome, 18-19 November, 2014.

Peers, S. (2013) 'The second phase of the Common European Asylum System: A brave new world – or lipstick on a pig?' Statewatch http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-220-ceas-second-phase.pdf

Peers,S. (2016) ‘The final EU/Turkey refugee deal: a legal assessment’. http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.it/2016/03/the-final-euturkey-refugee-deal-legal.html

Roman, E (2016) ‘L’accordo UE-Turchia: le criticità di un accordo a tutti i costi’. http://www.sidiblog.org/2016/03/21/laccordo-ue-turchia-le-criticita-di-un-accordo-a-tutti-i-costi/

Rossi, E. (2015) ‘The Agenda on Migration and the quota system for the relocation of international protection applicants: a factor of cohesion or fragmentation?’ Eutopia Magazine www. eutopiamagazine.eu/en/enzo-rossi

Rossi, E. e Iafrate, P. (2011) ‘Procedure e tempi delle richieste di protezione internazionale: i ricorsi’ Judicium. www.judicium.it.

Rossi E. e Vitali L. (2011) I rifugiati in Italia e in Europa, pp. XII-164, G. Giappichelli Editore.

Schain, M. (2009) 'The State Strikes Back: Immigration Policy in the European Union' European Journal of International Law 93, 104.

Thielemann, E. R. Williams, R. and Boswell, C., (2010), 'What System of Burden-Sharing between Member States for the Reception of Asylum Seekers?'. Report for the European Parliament.

Publicado
2016-09-30
Como Citar
ROSSI, E.; IAFRATE, P. IL SISTEMA DI ASILO EUROPEO E I DIRITTI UMANI DEI RIFUGIATI: VERSO UNA REGRESSIONE?. Gênero & Direito, v. 5, n. 2, 30 set. 2016.