EVALUATIVE CONCEPTS ENCODED IN METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n6.49386Palavras-chave:
cognitive metaphor, metonymy, value, evaluation, value concept.Resumo
Metaphorical models that convey the evaluative meaning are the focus of this article. The paper intends to show that metaphor and in certain cases metonymy belong to the main means of creating the value attitude to the facts of reality and thinking, this attitude resulting in certain utterances of evaluative character. The data for analysis consist of the utterances from the literary prose in different Indo-European languages of Slavonic, German and Romance groups. The examples show that the main metaphorical models and the specific sub-models in each of the thematic groups viewed as an object of the present study manifest the same or similar evaluative potentials irrespectively of the linguistic culture they belong to. That means that the general mechanism of creating the value relations receiving their manifestation in the form of evaluative utterances within different linguistic cultures is the sameDownloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Arutyunova, N. D., 1999. Yazyk I Mir Cheloveka. Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kultury.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M., 2003. Metaphors We Live by. Chicag
o: The University of Chicago Press.
Liu, F., 2018. Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics, 5:2.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., and J. Demmen, 2018. An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39/5: 625–645.
Lloyd, H. A., 2016. Law as Trope: Framing and Evaluating Conceptual Metaphors. Pace Law Review. 37(1): 89-114.
Arcimaviciene, L., and V. Jonaitiene, 2015. Metaphor Evaluation of Leadership Styles: A Case Study of Presidential New Year Greetings. Open Linguistics, 1: 345–360.
Podhorodecka, J., 2007. Evaluative Metaphor: Extended meanings of English motion verbs. Kraków: Wydawnictwo naukowe AP.
Kövecses, Z., 2003. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagener, A. E., 2017. Metaphor in Professional Counseling. The Professional Counselor, 7(2): 144–154.
Shutova, E., 2015. Design and Evaluation of Metaphor Processing Systems. Computational Linguistics, 41(4): 579-623.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M., 2003. Metaphors We Live by. Chicag
o: The University of Chicago Press.
Liu, F., 2018. Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics, 5:2.
Semino, E., Demjén, Z., and J. Demmen, 2018. An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer. Applied Linguistics, 39/5: 625–645.
Lloyd, H. A., 2016. Law as Trope: Framing and Evaluating Conceptual Metaphors. Pace Law Review. 37(1): 89-114.
Arcimaviciene, L., and V. Jonaitiene, 2015. Metaphor Evaluation of Leadership Styles: A Case Study of Presidential New Year Greetings. Open Linguistics, 1: 345–360.
Podhorodecka, J., 2007. Evaluative Metaphor: Extended meanings of English motion verbs. Kraków: Wydawnictwo naukowe AP.
Kövecses, Z., 2003. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagener, A. E., 2017. Metaphor in Professional Counseling. The Professional Counselor, 7(2): 144–154.
Shutova, E., 2015. Design and Evaluation of Metaphor Processing Systems. Computational Linguistics, 41(4): 579-623.
Downloads
Publicado
2019-11-27
Como Citar
NIKOLAEVNA PROKHOROVA, O. .; VLADIMIROVICH CHEKULAI, I. .; VLADIMIROVNA PUPYNINA, E. .; FEODOROVNA BEKH, E. . EVALUATIVE CONCEPTS ENCODED IN METAPHORICAL LANGUAGE. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 6, 2019. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n6.49386. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/49386. Acesso em: 28 dez. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Seção Livre
