STRAUSS AND THE MORAL ANTITHESIS ARGUMENT AGAINST SCIENTISM IN HOBBES' PHILOSOPHY

Authors

  • Delmo Mattos da Silva UniCeuma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v12i1.56665

Keywords:

Hobbes, Vanity, Civil philosophy, Mechanism, Fear

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a critique of Strauss' claims to determine a moral foundation for Hobbes' civil philosophy. It is therefore a question of discussing the determinations of man's behavior derived from a natural tendency imposed upon him. In this way, the viability of the link between natural philosophy and civil philosophy is exposed in order to determine Hobbes' commitment to the terms of the mechanism of his time. Strauss' argument that the principle of self-preservation is based on a moral antithesis between vanity and the fundamentally just fear of violent death is thus made impossible.

Author Biography

  • Delmo Mattos da Silva, UniCeuma

    Doutor em Filosofia pela UFRJ.

Published

2021-08-17

Issue

Section

Papers

How to Cite

Mattos da Silva, D. (2021). STRAUSS AND THE MORAL ANTITHESIS ARGUMENT AGAINST SCIENTISM IN HOBBES’ PHILOSOPHY. Problemata: International Journal of Philosophy, 12(1), 252-269. https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v12i1.56665

Similar Articles

1-10 of 849

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.