INTENSIFICATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS:

THE EXPERIENCE OF SERBIA

Autores

  • Konstantin A. Polovchenko MGIMO University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2020v9n2.50807

Palavras-chave:

legislative power, legislative initiative, separation of powers, functions of parliament, the promulgation of the law, amending the constitution.

Resumo

The article presents an analysis of the legislative process in the Republic of Serbia. The leading method in this study is a systematic approach that allowed analyzing the specifics of the stages of the legislative process in terms of ensuring its effectiveness and efficiency. Studying the peculiarities of the lawmaking of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, the author concluded that the modern constitutional legislation of Serbia provided for the intensification of the legislative process, which, in turn, made it possible to update, develop and increase the current legislative array of the Republic of Serbia within a fairly short period

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

The 2006 Constitution of the Republic of Serbia / ‘Službeni glasnik’ Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia 98/06.

The Law on National Assembly / Official Gazette RS 9/10.

Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia / Official Gazette RS 52/10, 13/11, 20/12.

Law on Referendum and People's Initiative / Official Gazette RS 48/94, 11/98.

Constitutional Court Decision IU 61/01 / Official Gazette RS 16/04.

Constitutional Court Decision IU 72/02 / Official Gazette RS 8/04.

Constitutional Court Decision I U61/01/ Official Gazette RS.

Jovičić, M. Big constitutional systems-elements for a comparative constitutional law / Belgrade, 1984.

Lajvanic, M. Constitutional Law and Constitutional Institutions (In Serb.) / Novi Sad, 2003.

Lukić, R. Introduction to Law (In Serb.) / Belgrade, 2004.

Marković, R. Constitutional law (In Serb.) / Belgrade, 2014.

Marković R. Ustav Republike Srbije od 2006–kritički pogled [Marković, R. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia since 2006: Critical view] (In Serb.); Belgrade University School of Law Publishing, 54 (2). 2006.

Pajvančić, M. Constitutional law (In Serb.) / Novi Sad, 2014.

Pajvančić, M. Law on Parliament (In Serb.) / Belgrade, 2008.

Pajvančić, M. Komentar Ustava Rebublike Srbije [Pajvančić, M. Commentary on the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia] (In Serb.) / KAS Belgrade, 2009.

Pejić, I. Law on Parliament (In Serb.) / Niš, 2011.

Petrov, V. Law on Parliament / Belgrade, 2010.

Konstantin A. Polovchenko. (2019). Normative Control of Law as the Basic Power of Constitutional Court // Opción, Año 35, Especial No.20 (2019). 1264-1276.

Konstantin A. Polovchenko (2019). Public prosecution service as an object of constitutional regulation // Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. Año: VI Número: Edición Especial Artículo no.:69 Período: Agosto, 2019

Konstantin A. Polovchenko Role of ombudsman in human rights protection in a contemporary state (2019). Role of ombudsman in human rights protection in a contemporary state // Opcion. Año 35, Especial No.19 (2019). 637-665.

Ponomareva, E.G. Dissertation on ‘Formation of statehood in the post-Yugoslavian space: the internal and external factors’ / Moscow, 2010.

Roskić, J. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia and Current Legal Practice / Belgrade, 2007.

Simović, D. Racionalizovani parlamentarizam Ustava Srbij [Simović, D. Rationalized parliamentarianism of the 2006 Serbian Constitution] (In Serb.) / Belgrade Law Review: 14/2007

Stojanović, D. Legal status of the deputy (In Serb.) / Niš, 1999.

Stojanović, D. Constitutional law (In Serb.) / Niš, 2019.

Stojanović, D. Constitutional law (In Serb.) / Niš, 2014.

Stojanović, D. ‘Ваsiс characteristics and contents of Serbian constitution’. Facta Universitatis Nis. 2007.

Vasić, R., Jovanović, M., Dajović, G. Introduction to Law (In Serb.) / University of Belgrade Law Faculty publishers, 2015

Publicado

2020-02-24

Como Citar

A. POLOVCHENKO, K. . INTENSIFICATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS: : THE EXPERIENCE OF SERBIA. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 2, 2020. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2020v9n2.50807. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/article/view/50807. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Seção Livre