Gestão do conhecimento: autores contemporâneos para além de Nonaka e Takeuchi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2024v14n2.66942Resumo
Há um reconhecimento sobre a importância que pesquisadores influentes exercem em campos científicos. Uma das principais contribuições no campo da Gestão do Conhecimento é a de Nonaka e Takeuchi, com a teoria da criação do conhecimento. Como o campo se consolidou, outros autores contribuíram para o desenvolvimento científico desta área. Estudo anterior no campo da Gestão do Conhecimento, por meio dos estudos bibliométricos, identifica que um dos autores mais influentes é Alexandre Serenko. O objetivo deste estudo é identificar e analisar as contribuições do autor para o campo da Gestão do Conhecimento. O estudo é quantitativo e qualitativo, com base em dados secundários relativos à produção científica de Alexander Serenko. Em termos metodológicos, é um estudo bibliométrico com base em produções na plataforma Google acadêmico e Web of Science. Foram desenvolvidas análises quantitativas, referente à produção do autor e análise qualitativa temática dos textos mais citados na área de GC. De forma complementar, realiza uma busca na base de dados da Emerald, por autor e os artigos recentes que não foram citados nos levantamentos realizados na Web of Science e no Google Acadêmico foram inseridos para análise qualitativa. Os achados da pesquisa mostram as principais produções e os temas abordados, além de mostrar o papel relevante do autor nas discussões sobre a produção científica no campo da Gestão do conhecimento.
Downloads
Referências
ABUBAKAR, A. M; ELREHAIL, H.; ALATAILAT, M; ELÇI, A. Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, V.4, n.12, p.104-114, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003.
AGUINIS, H.; RAMANI, S.; ALABDULJADER, N. Best practices recomendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational Researches Methods, v. 26, n.1, p. 46-76 , 2023.
ALAVI, M., ; LEIDNER, D. E. Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, v. 25, n. 1, p., 107–136, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
BARNEY, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n.1, p. 99-120, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
BASKERVILLE, R; DULIPOVICI, A. The theoretical foundations of knowledge Management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4, pp.83–105, 2006.
BONTIS, N.; SERENKO, A. A follow‐up ranking of academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 13, n. 1, p. 16-26, 2009.
BRAUN, V; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in. Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006.
BUKOWITZ, W. R.; WILLIAMS, R. L. The knowledge management field book. United States: Prentice Hall, 2000.
CAMARGO, LARA REZENDE FERREIRA; OLIVEIRA, J. S. Os lugares de fala das mulheres acadêmicas no campo do empreendedorismo no Brasil: Um estudo entre os anos de 2005 e 2020. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 60, pp. 73-87, 2021.
CHAUDHURI, RANJAN; CHAVAN, GITESH; VADALKAR, SUNITI; VRONTIS, DEMETRIS; PEREIRA, VIJAY. Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the Journal of Knowledge Management. Journal Of Knowledge Management, v. 25, n. 6, pp. 1550-1574, 2021. https://doi.org 10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0571
CORRÊA, F; PAIXÃO, C.; DE PAULA, A. ; CARVALHO, D B. F; DE FARIA, V. F; LIMA, L. C. Gestão do conhecimento: análise de modelos de maturidade de 2000 A 2017. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, v. 12, número especial, p. 105-121, 2022.https://dx.doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2022v12nespecial.62042
CORREA, F.; ZIVIANI, F.; CHINELATO, F. BRAGA, F. GESTÃO do conhecimento: uma análise metabibliometrica. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, v. 6, n. 2, p. 208-224, 2016. http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/pgc.
CRANEFIELD, J.; GORDON, M. E.; PALVIA, P.; SERENKO, A.; JACKS, T. From fun-lovers to institutionalists: uncovering pluralism in IT occupational culture. Information Technology & People. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2020-0020.
DALKIR, K. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Burlignton: Elsevier, 2011
DALKIR, K. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. 3ª ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2017.
DAVENPORT, T.H., PRUSAK, L. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Knowl. Creat. Diffus. Util. 309, 1998.
EVANS, M.M., DALKIR, K.; BIDIAN, C. A holistic view of the knowledge lifecycle: the knowledge cycle (KMC) model. In KenGrant and John Dumay (eds), Leading issues in knowledge management: for researchers, teachers, and students, Vol 2, 2015.
FEREDAY, J.; MUIR-COCHARANE, E. Demonstrating Rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, v. 5, n.1, 2006.
FINLAY, L. Thematic analysis: The ‘Good’, the ‘Bad’ and the ‘Ugly. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Pscychoterapy, v. 11, p. 103-116, 2021.
FOUREZ, G. A construção das ciências. Introdução à Filosofia e à Ética das Ciências. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP, 1998.
GAVIRIA-MARINA, MAGALY; MERIGÓB, JOSÉ M.; BAIER-FUENTES, HUGO. Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric Analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, v.140, pp. 194–220, 2019.
GOLD, A. H.; MALHOTRA, A; SEGARS, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 18, n.1, p. 185-214, https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
GRANT, R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, v. 17, n. S2, p. 109-122, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.
HASSAN, N. R.; SERENKO, A. Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Documentation, v. 75, n. 3, p. 593-611, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2018-0125.
HEESEOK L.; BYOUNGGU C. Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 20, n.1, p. 179-228, 2003. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
KHASSEH, A. A.; MOKHTARPOUR, R. Tracing the historical origins of knowledge management issues through referenced publication years spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 20, n. 6, p. 1393–1404, 10 out. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2016-0019.
LINNEHLUECKE, M. K.; MARRONE, M. SINGH, A.K . Conducting systematic literature review and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, v. 45, n. 2, p. 175-194, 2020.
MA, Z.; YU, K. Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998‐2007. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 14, n. 2, p. 175–189, 6 abr. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032337.
MACHADO, H. P. V., ELIAS, M. L. G.G.R. Gestão do conhecimento: constituição do campo, temas e perspectivas de pesquisas. Transinformação, v. 32, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202032e200037.
MASSARO, M. GUTHRIE, J. D. On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 29 n. 5, p. 767-801, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939.
MEYER, M.; ZACK, M. The design and implementation of information products. Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 43-59, 1996
NONAKA, I., TAKEUCHI, H. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, 1995.
PARÉ, G., TRUDEL, M-C., JAANA, M., KITSIOU, S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, v. 52, n. 2, p. 183-189, 2015.
PENROSE, E. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Sharpe, 1959.
PEROTTI, F. A.; FERRARIS, A.; CANDELO, E.; BUSSO, D. The dark side of knowledge sharing: Exploring “knowledge sabotage” and its antecedents. Journal of business Research, v. 141, p. 422-432, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.033
RAMY, A. et al. A scientometric analysis of Knowledge Management Research and Practice literature: 2003–2015. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, v. 16, n. 1, p. 66–77, 2 jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1405776.
SCATOLIN, H. G. A gestão do conhecimento nas organizações: o legado de Nonaka e Takeuchi. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento, v. 5, n. 2, p. 4-13, 2015. http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/pgc
SERENKO, A. Home Page. http://www.aserenko.com/index.htm. Acessado 5 de agosto de 2021.
SERENKO, A. COX, R.A.K., BONTIS, N., BOOKER, L.D. The superstar phenomenon in the knowledge management and intellectual capital academic discipline. Journal of Infometrics, v. 5, n. 3, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.005.
SERENKO, A., BONTIS, N., BOOKER, L., SADEDDIN, K. AND HARDIE, T. A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994‐2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 14, n. 1, p. 3–23, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015534.
SERENKO, A.; BONTIS, N. Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 20, n. 4, p. 687-712, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0394.
SERENKO, A.; BONTIS, N. Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 21, n. 3, p. 675–692, 20 mar. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0490.
SERENKO, A.; DUMAY, J. Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part III: author survey. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 21, n. 2, p. 330-354. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0300.
SERENKO, A.; BONTIS, N. The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 137–155, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300840.
SERENKO, A. Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 17, n. 5, pp. 773-812, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2013-0166.
SERENKO, A.; BONTIS, N. Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: Citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge and process management, v. 11, n. 3, p. 185-198, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.203.
SERENKO, A. BONTIS, N.; BOOKER, L.; SADEDDIN, K.; HARDIE, T. A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 14, p. 3-23, 2010. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673271011015534.
SERENKO, A.; DUMAY, J. Citation classics published in Knowledge Management journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect, Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 19, n.6, p. 1335-1355, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2015-0086.
SERENKO. A.; TUREL, O. Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: An Empirical Investigation of Facebook Users. Transactions on Replication Research. v. 1, n. 2, p. 1-18, 2015. https://aisel.aisnet.org/trr/vol1/iss1/2.
SERENKO, A; BONTIS, N. Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203.
SERENKO, A. Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration. Journal of Knowledge Management, v, 23, n. 7, p. 1260-1288, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2018-0007.
SERENKO, A. Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the perspective of the target. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 24, n. 4, p. 737-773, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2019-0337.
SERENKO, A. A structured literature review of scientometric research of the knowledge management discipline: a 2021 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2020-0730.
SERENKO, A.; CHOO, C. W. Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 24, n.9, p. 2299-2325, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2020-0416.
SOHRABI, B., VANANI, I.R., JALALI, S.M.J. AND ABEDIN, E. Evaluation of research trends in knowledge management: a hybrid analysis through burst detection and text clustering. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, v. 18, n. 4, pp. 1950043-1950043, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649219500436
TORRACO, R. J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, p. 1-25, 2016.
TSOUKAS, H.; VLADIMIROU, E. What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, v. 38, n. 7, p. 973-991, 2001.
WANG, P. et al. Visualizing the Academic Discipline of Knowledge Management. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 3, p. 682, mar. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030682.
WIIG, K. M., Knowledge management foundations: Thinking about thinking: How people and organizations create, represent, and use knowledge, Arlington, TX: Schema Press, 1993
