NATIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF BAIKAL PROTECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2020v9n03.51679Palavras-chave:
Baikal natural territory; sustainable development; unique ecosystem; allocation of authorities; local community.Resumo
the relevance of the article is conditioned by the need to improve management efficiency in the area of environmental management and conservancy in the conditions of a federal state. The purpose of the article is to analyze the current system of relations in the regulation of the protection of Baikal lake as a World Heritage object and identification of the reasons behind the impaired efficiency of state efforts to reduce impact on the lake’s ecosystem and ensure sustainable development of the adjacent territory. The analysis is targeted at the allocation of authorities by management levels – from federal to local. The study methodology rests on the analysis of empiric materials and structured-functional approach that makes it possible to single out discrepancies in the exercise of control and executive functions at various levels of environmental protection management. The main discrepancy is the predominance of prohibitive and conservative approaches, which hampers coordination of objectives of the protection of the unique ecosystem and sustainable development of coastal territories. The federal focus of main executive powers results in the ignorance of interests of local communities and passive participation of regional authorities in the implementation of the main tasks related to the recovery of disturbed ecosystems. There are no management bodies in charge of a comprehensive approach to the territory development and there are no established horizontal ties between interested regions. This brings about the expansion of shadow economies related to the use of natural resources. It is proposed to enhance the regional level of decision-making by establishing a system of accommodation of interests of federal subjects concerned and a higher focus on the development of ecologically-oriented economic activities. The article materials may be of use when working out approaches and methods of the management of sustainable territory development and when improving the system of the national ecological policy as a whole.
Downloads
Referências
Larson A.M., Soto. 2008. Decentralization of natural resource governments regimes. Annual review of environment and resources. No. 33(1). P. 213-239.
Wright V.C. 2017. Turbulent terrains: The contradictions and Politics of Decentralized Conservation. Conservation and Society. No. 15(2). P. 157-167.
Dudley N. (ed.). 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland. IUCN Publication Services.
Brown J., Hay-Edie T. 2014. Engaging Local Communities in Stewardship of World Heritage. A methodology based on the COMPACT experience. Paris, UNESCO World Heritage Paper Series No. 40.
Greider T., Janki M., Orellana M., Savaresi A., Shelton D. 2009. Conservation with Justice. A Right-Based Approach. IUCN Environment Law and Policy Paper No. 71. Gland, Switzerland.
Albert M.T., Richon N., Vinals M.J., Whitecomb A. (eds). 2012. Community Development through World Heritage. Paris, UNESCO World Heritage Centre. World Heritage Papers No. 31.
Maksimova I.I. Building of the Baikal conservation management system [Formirovaniye sistemy upravleniya sokhraneniyem ozera Baikal]. Irkutsk: Publishing house of the Institute of Geography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2004. P. 155.
Maksimova I.I. Delineation of jurisdictions in the field of Baikal protection management [Razgranicheniye polnomochiy v sfere upravleniya okhranoy ozera Baikal]. Novosibirsk: Academy publishing house Geo, 2010. P. 104.
Danilova Z.I. Assessment of the environmental protection management level in a transboundary region [Otsenka urovnya upravleniya okhranoy okruzhayushchey sredy v transgranichnom regione]. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2014. No. 14 (2). P. 84-87.
Territorial planning of the central ecological zone of the Baikal natural territory [Territorialnoye planirovaniye Tsentralnoy ekologicheskoy zony Baykalskoy prirodnoy territorii]. Novosibirsk: Academy publishing house Geo, 2013. P. 407.
Khyshiktuyev О.V., Badmatsyrenova Ye.L. Lake Baikal protection issues: international and domestic legal aspects [Problemy zashchity ozera Baykal:
mezhdunarodno-pravovyye i natsionalno-pravovyye aspekty] // Issues of Russian and international law. 2017. Vol. 7. No. 2A. P. 147-158.
State report ''On the Baikal condition and its protection measures in 2015.'' Irkutsk: INTsKhT, 2016. P. 372.
Zilov Ye.A. Current state of the human impact on Lake Baikal [Sovremennoye sostoyaniye antropogennogo vozdeystviya na ozero Baikal]. Magazine of the Siberian Federal University. Series: Biology. 2013. Vol. 6, No. 4. P. 388-404.
Nikitin V.М., Savelyev V.А., Berezhnykh Т.V., Abasov N.V. Hydroenergy-related problems of Lake Baikal: the past and the present [Gidroenergeticheskiye problemy ozera Baikal: proshloye i nastoyashcheye]. Region: economics and sociology. 2015. No. 3. P. 273-295.
Bolgov М.V., Buber А.L., Korobkina Ye.А., Lyubushin А.А., Filippova I.А. Lake Baikal: extreme levels as a rare hydrologic event [Ozero Baykal:
ekstremalnyye urovni kak redkoye gidrologicheskoye sobytiye]. Water resources. 2017. Vol. 44, No. 3. P. 392-406.
Zabortseva Т.I. What is to be done with wastes? Statutory and regulatory solutions and regional practical aspects [Chto delat s otkhodami:
normativno-zakonodatelnyye resheniya i regionalnaya praktika]. ECO. 2016. No. 6. P. 155-167.
Evaluation of the Great Lakes Program. Final Report. Audit and Evaluation Branch. March 2017. Environment and Climate Change Canada.
https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/documents/pdf/evaluation-great-lake-program/Evaluation_of_the_great_Lakes_program.pdf. Accessed date: August 15, 2017.
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan. February 21, 2010. www.dec.ny.gov/docs/regions_pdf/glriplan.pdf. Accessed date: August 20, 2017.
Pervaze A. Sheikh. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative: Background and Issues. September 30, 2013. Congressional Research Service. aquadoc.typepad.com/files/crs_great_lakes_restoration.pdf. Accessed date: August 10, 2017.
Bychkov I.V., Maksimova I.I., Kuznetsova А.N. Legal framework for the state environmental monitoring of the Baikal natural territory [Pravovoye obespecheniye gosudarstvennogo ekologicheskogo monitoringa Baykal'skoy prirodnoy territorii] // Geography and natural recourses. 2015. No. 1. P. 55-61.
Khamnayev I.V. The concept of Baikal ecosystem and the necessity of its legal regulation [Ponyatiye ekosistemy ozera Baykal i neobkhodimost yeye pravovogo regulirovaniya]. Pressing issues of the Russian law. 2007. No. 1. P. 251-257.
Stroev P.V. Transformation of the spatial structure of Russia [Transformatsiya prostranstvennoy struktury Rossii]. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014. No. 4. P. 61-71.
Fattakhov R.V., Stroev P.V. The spatial aspect in modernization of the Russian economy [Prostranstvennyy aspekt modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii]. Economics. Taxes. Law. 2015. No. 6. P. 6-14.
Nizamutdinov М.М., Oreshnikov V.V. Methodological and practical aspects of the modeling and scenario forecasting of the development of a territorial system at a municipal level [Metodicheskiye i prakticheskiye aspekty zadachi modelirovaniya i stsenarnogo prognozirovaniya razvitiya territorialnoy sistemy munitsipalnogo urovnya] // Economy study: theory and practice. 2017. Vol. 16, No. 7 (466). P. 1204-1216.
Sysoeva N.М., Sysoeva О.V. Problems of business development in the coastal zone of Baikal [Problemy razvitiya predprinimatelstva v pribrezhnoy zone Baykala] // Geography and natural resources. 2016. No. 5. P. 144-150.
