THOUGHT AND MENTALISMS IN WITTGENSTEIN’S TRACTATUS

Authors

  • Rafael Silva UFRGS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v9i2.37921

Keywords:

mentalism, thought, method of projection.

Abstract

This paper presents the debate on the attribution of two forms of mentalism to the early Wittgenstein, in the light of the exegetical dispute on propositions 3 and 3.1 of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The aim of this text is to show that there are serious difficulties both for those who argue that there is at least one form of mentalism present in the Tractatus and for those who reject one or both forms of mentalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DIAMOND, Cora. (2005). “Peter Winch on the Tractatus and the Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy”. Em A. Pichler e Saatela eds. p, 133-163.

HACKER, P.M.S. (1999). “Naming, Thinking and Meaning in the Tractatus”. Philosophical Investigations, 22: 119–135.

MALCOLM, N. (1993). Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? London: Routledge.

WINCH, Peter. (1987). “Language, Thought and The World. In: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. Em Trying to Make Sense. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987, pp3-17.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1971). Prototractatus. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

______. (1993). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trad. Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos. 3ª Ed. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

______. (1969). Notebooks 1914-1916. Edited by G. H. von Wright & G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Harper & Row Publishers

Published

2018-08-24

Issue

Section

Papers