RECENTES DESENVOLVIMENTOS DA FENOMENOLOGIA EM CONTEXTOS NÃO FILOSÓFICOS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v14i3.64930

Palavras-chave:

Fenomenologia aplicada, Microfenomenologia, Entrevista fenomenológica

Resumo

O objetivo deste artigo consiste em apresentar dois recentes desenvolvimentos da metodologia fenomenológica de descrição e análise da experiência vivida. Acredita-se que essas duas propostas, já empregadas com resultados significativos na descrição e análise de experiências subjetivas em diferentes domínios vivenciais, possam ter importante contribuição no campo dos estudos sobre o cuidado e sobre a experiência vivida na dimensão da saúde. Tendo isso em vista, a partir de uma revisão da literatura, procedeu-se à apresentação da entrevista microfenomenológica e da entrevista fenomenológica. Como conclusão, é possível afirmar que a microfenomenologia e a entrevista fenomenológica diferenciam-se das metodologias consagradas de pesquisa qualitativa fenomenológica, na medida em que resultam do recente movimento de naturalização da fenomenologia e da atitude de mútuo esclarecimento em relação às Ciências Cognitivas. Tal característica implica que a aplicação dessas ferramentas metodológicas na área das Ciências da Saúde contém um importante potencial de compreensão dos complexos significados da experiência vivida em primeira pessoa.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BURCH, M. Make applied phenomenology what it needs to be: an interdisciplinary research program. Continental Philosophy Review, v. 54, n. 2, p. 275-293, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-021-09532-1.

FINLAY, L. Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, v. 3, n. 1, p. 6-25, 2009. DOI: 10.29173/pandpr19818.

FROESE, T. et al. The pandemic experience: a corpus of subjective reports on life during the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico. Frontiers in Public Health, v. 9, 725506, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725506.

GALLAGHER, S. Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 4, n. 3, p. 195-214, 1997.

GALLAGHER, S. Rethinking nature: phenomenology and a non-reductionist cognitive science. Australasian Philosophical Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 125-137, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/24740500.2018.1552074.

GIORGI, A. Review essay: a response to the attempted critique of the scientific phenomenological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 83-144, 2017. DOI: 10.1163/15691624-12341319.

HØFFDING, S. A phenomenology of musical absorption. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

HØFFDING, S.; MARTINY, K. Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 15, n. 4, p. 539-564, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-015-9433-z.

HØFFDING, S.; MARTINY, K.; ROEPSTORFF, A. Can we trust the phenomenological interview? Metaphysical, epistemological, and methodological objections. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 21, n. 1, p. 33-51, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-021-09744-z.

KLINKE, M. et al. Getting the left right. Qualitative Health Research, v. 25, n. 12, p. 1623-1636, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314566328.

KLINKE, M.; FERNANDEZ, A. Taking phenomenology beyond the first-person perspective: conceptual grounding in the collection and analysis of observational evidence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-021-09796-1.

KOCKELMANS, J. Phenomenological psychology: the Dutch school. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 1987.

KØSTER, A.; FERNANDEZ, A. Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-020-09723-w.

MANEN, M. Phenomenology of practice. London: Routledge, 2014.

MANEN, M. Phenomenology it its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, v. 27, p. 810-825, 2017a. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317699381.

MANEN, M. But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, v. 27, p. 775-779, 2017b. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317699570.

MANEN, M. Phenomenology and meaning attribution. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-12, 2017c. DOI: 10.1080/20797222.2017.1368253.

MANEN, M. Rebuttal rejoinder: present IPA for what it is – Interpretative psychological analysis. Qualitative Health Research, v. 28, p. 1959-1968, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318795474.

MANEN, M. Rebuttal: doing phenomenology on the things. Qualitative Health Research, v. 29, p. 908-925, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1049732319827293.

MARTINY, K. Embodying investigations of cerebral palsy: a case of open cognitive science. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, 2015.

MARTINY, K.; TORO, J.; HØFFDING, S. Framing a phenomenological mixed method: from inspiration to guidance. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, 602081, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.60208.

PALEY, J. Husserl, phenomenology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 26, p. 187-193, 1997. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026187.x.

PALEY, J. Misinterpretive phenomenology: Heidegger, ontology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 27, p. 817-824, 1998. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00607.x.

PALEY, J. Phenomenology as rhetoric. Nursing Inquiry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 106-116, 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00263.x.

PALEY, J. Phenomenology as qualitative research: a critical analysis of meaning attribution. London: Routledge, 2016.

PETITMENGIN, C. Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: an interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, v. 5, p. 229-269, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2.

PETITMENGIN, C. et al. What is it like to meditate? Methods and issues for a micro-phenomenological description of meditative experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 24, n. 5-6, p. 170-198, 2017.

PETITMENGIN, C.; NAVARRO, V.; QUYEN, M. Anticipating seizure: pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, v. 16, p. 746-764, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.006.

PETITMENGIN, C.; REMILLIEUX, A.; VALENZUELA-MOGUILLANSKY, C. Discovering the structures of lived experience: towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, v. 18, n. 4, p. 691-730, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4.

SMITH, J. A. “Yes, it is phenomenological”: a reply to Max van Manen's critique of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Health Research, v. 28, n. 12, p. 1955-1958, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318799577.

VALENZUELA-MOGUILLANSKY, C. An exploration of the bodily experience of persons suffering from fibromyalgia. Constructivist Foundations, v. 8, n. 3, p. 339-350, 2013.

WITHERINGTON, D. et al. Metatheory and the primacy of conceptual analysis in developmental science. Human Development, v. 61, p. 181-198, 2018. DOI: 10.1159/000490160.

ZAHAVI, D. Naturalized phenomenology. In: GALLAGHER, S.; SCHMICKING, D. Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. p. 3-19.

ZAHAVI, D. Phenomenology. The basics. London: Routledge, 2016.

ZAHAVI, D. Getting it quite wrong: van Manen and Smith on phenomenology. Qualitative Health Research, v. 29, n. 6, p. 900-907, 2019a. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318817547.

ZAHAVI, D.; MARTINY, K. Phenomenology in nursing studies: new perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Studies, v. 93, p. 155-162, 2019b. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.014.

ZAHAVI, D. The practice of phenomenology: the case of Max van Manen. Nursing Philosophy, v. 21, n. 2, e12276, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/nup.12276.

ZAHAVI, D. Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché. Continental Philosophy Review, v. 54, p. 259-273, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y.

Downloads

Publicado

02-10-2023

Edição

Seção

ESPECIAL – O filósofo do Sertão: homenagem ao prof. Edmilson Alves de Azevêdo