O QUE É UMA BOA AULA?

ANÁLISE DISCURSIVA DE UM TUTORIAL PARA CRIAÇÃO DE UMA AULA ONLINE

Authors

  • Ana Carolina Cortez Noronha Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2446-7006.45v26n2.59490

Abstract

Seeking to shed some light on how the transmission of culture and the construction of knowledge are conceived in schools in Brazil at the beginning of the 21st century, we conducted a discourse analysis of lesson plans available online on a website run by the Brazilian Ministry of Education, which was part of our doctoral research (accomplished in December 2020). We understand that lesson plans bring, in a text, the teacher's conception of what a lesson is, as well as their interpretative work on legal documents that rule Brazilian education and their persuasive work on two subjects: the teacher who is the addressee of the lesson plan and the students, addressees of the lesson. They also bring the class conception of the Ministry of Education that, by approving the classes that were made available on its website, allows us to apprehend its considerations about them. For these analyses, we use discourse semiotic theory, relying more strongly on Diana Luz Pessoa de Barros (2001), José Luiz Fiorin (2002), Greimas (2014 [1980]) and the Dictionary of Semiotics, by Greimas and Courtés (s/d [1979]). This article, which presents part of our thesis, brings an analysis of the tutorial "How to create a class", from MEC's Portal do Professor (Teacher's Portal), from 2008, which teaches how to create a class to be published in the Portal.  Our goal, based on this analysis, was to understand what is understood as a "good lesson", an object of value sought by the subject that goes to this site.

key words: discoursive semiotics, semiotics and education, lesson plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-08-03

How to Cite

Cortez Noronha, A. C. (2021). O QUE É UMA BOA AULA? : ANÁLISE DISCURSIVA DE UM TUTORIAL PARA CRIAÇÃO DE UMA AULA ONLINE. Acta Semiotica Et Lingvistica, 26(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2446-7006.45v26n2.59490