Loneliness and rebellion in Dostoevsky’s existencial philosophy: through the character of Smerdyakov in “The brothers Karamazov”

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i2.74336

Palavras-chave:

Smerdyakov, solitude, rebellion, Dostoevsky’s existential philosophy, The Brothers Karamazov

Resumo

This article focuses on elucidating the psychological developments of Smerdyakov in The Brothers Karamazov—a representative character in a quintessential work of Dostoevsky’s existential philosophy. Smerdyakov’s solitude, yearning, and rebellion as a means of self-assertion profoundly exemplify the “philosophy of mood” within the conflicted social landscape of Russia. The dualistic nature of existence is revealed here: on one hand, resignation to fate; on the other, a reaction striving to overcome it; on one side, submission; on the other, a willful defiance concealed beneath the character’s calculated performances—this is the case with Smerdyakov. The article reconstructs the existential crisis through Smerdyakov’s loneliness and rebellion, thereby highlighting Dostoevsky’s sharp and brilliant literary craftsmanship, as well as his contributions to the existential intellectual current of humanity. This study affirms existential values in Dostoevsky’s philosophy, such as pessimism, feelings of isolation and rejection, rebellion against fate intertwined with messages of freedom and responsibility, the unconscious and the eruption of creativity, choice and faith—values that remain worthy of praise and serve as a lasting source of inspiration. These elements are echoed in the thoughts of many later philosophers, both Russian and Western.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Quynh Thi Nguyen, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho Chi Minh City / Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City

University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Trang Do, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law

Associate Professor at the Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law.
Ph.D. in Philosophy from Ho Chi Minh University of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2016.

Referências

BERDYAEV, N. A. Dostoevsky’s View of Life. Tradução GIAO, N. Hanoi: Literature Publishing House, 2025.

BESSCHETNOVA, E. The Holy See and Fyodor Dostoevsky: Mutual Attraction and Repulsion. Arts, 12, n. 2, p. 76, 2023.

BYKOVA, M. F. Dostoevsky’s Philosophical Universe. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 60, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2022.

CAMUS, A. La Chute. Tradução TRAN, T. D. Hanoi: Writers Association Publishing House, 1995.

DOSTOEVSKY, F. The Double. Tradução PEVEAR, R. e VOLOKHONSKY, L. New York: Vintage Books, 2009.

DOSTOEVSKY, F. The Brothers Karamazov. Tradução PHAM, M. H. Hanoi: Labor Publishing House, 2013.

DOSTOEVSKY, F. Notes from Underground. Tradução THIEN LUONG. Hanoi: Literature Publishing House, 2023.

FANGER, D. The Creation of Nikolai Gogol. Harvard University Press, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674419292

FEUERBACH, L. The Essence of Christianity. Tradução ELIOT, G. New York: Prometheus Books, 1989.

FRANK, J. Dostoevsky: A Writer in His Time. Princeton University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400833412

FUNG, P. Dostoevsky, Consciousness and Romantic Irony. Dostoevsky Journal, 18, n. 1, p. 73-94, 03 Jan. 2017 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23752122-01801005

GOGOL, N. The Overcoat and Other Short Stories.Tradução PEVEAR, R. e VOLOKHONSKY, L. 2004.

GOLOSOVKER, Y. E. Dostoevsky and Kant. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of USSR, 1963.

HORVÁTH, G. Writing and iconicity in The Idiot: towards Dostoevsky’ s graphopoetics. Studies in East European Thought, 2025.

ISUPOV, K. G. Introduction to Dostoevsky’s Metaphysics. Saint Petersburg: Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House), 2017.

JOVANOV, M. V. In the Beginning There Will Have Been Violence: Justice and Law. The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria, n. 38, p. 123-145, 2021.

KIERKEGAARD. Fear and Trembling. Tradução HANNAY, A. London: Penguin Books, 1985.

LARA, J. S. BRAT’YA: The Architecture of Dostoevsky. In: VICUÑA, M. e GIORGI, E. (Ed.). Intersections: Interdisciplinary Research on Architecture, Design, City and Territory. Cham: Springer, 2025. p. 575-588.

LIFSHITZ, M. The Problem of Dostoevsky (Conversations with the Devil). Moscow: Academitresky Proekt, 2013.

LOSSKY, N. Dostoevsky and his Christian worldview. New York: Chekhov Publishers, 1953.

MASPERO, G. People of mercy: theological laicity in The Brothers Karamazov. Church, Communication and Culture, 2, n. 3, p. 249-258, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2017.1398593

NGUYEN, Q. T.; DO, T. Metaphysics of loneliness in Dostoevsky’s view of life: essence and issues posed. Synesis, 16, n. 1, p. 582-600, 2024.

NGUYEN, Q. T.; DO, T. The Dostoevsky’s Existential Philosophy: A New Contribution to Freedom. Kalagatos, 22, n. 2, p. eK25023, 2025.

NGUYEN, T. Q.; DINH, N. T. The Analyzing Human Existence Through Fyodor Dostoevsky’s literary contributions. Kalagatos, 21, n. 1, p. eK24015, 03/31 2024.

ROBERTS, P. Love, attention and teaching: Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. Open Review of Educational Research, 5, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1404434

SARTRE, J. P. Nausea. Tradução NGUYEN, T. D. Hanoi: Literature Publishing House, 1994.

XU, F. The Three Forms of Dostoevsky’s Philosophy. Chinese Journal of Slavic Studies, 4, n. 2, p. 169-180, 2024.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2025-08-19

Como Citar

Nguyen, Q. T., & Do, T. (2025). Loneliness and rebellion in Dostoevsky’s existencial philosophy: through the character of Smerdyakov in “The brothers Karamazov”. Aufklärung: Journal of Philosophy, 12(2), p.107–120. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i2.74336

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos Semelhantes

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.