“INDICATION” AND “MEANING”: A BRIEF CONSIDERATION ABOUT THE HUSSERL’S THINKING ON THE OBJETUAL RELATION OF MATHEMATICS

Authors

  • Rogério Galdino Trindade
  • Gilfranco Lucena dos Santos UFPB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v10i1.46643

Keywords:

Husserl, Mathematics, Phenomenology, Indication, Meaning.

Abstract

A meaningful expression by Husserl carries an indication and a meaning at the same time. Consequently, in common speech both indication and meaning get confused. However, for the phi- losopher is indispensable to draw up these two instances from the standpoint of a descriptive psy- chology that may describe more precisely the behavior of an expression as such. Therefore, this paper wishes to clarify the distinction raised by Husserl between “indication” and “meaning”. This fundamental distinction, that gets blurred by the common speech, must be drawn out by a phenom- enology of intentionality. To illustrate and enlighten such a distinction the relation of pure and ap- plied mathematics with their respective objects was taken as a paradigm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

HEIDEGGER, Martin. História da Filosofia: de Tomás de Aquino a Kant. Trad. de Ênio Paulo Giachini. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2009.

HILBERT, David. Sobre o Infinito, in Fundamentos da Geometria. Trad. Paulino Lima Fortes e A. J; Franco de Oliveira. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2003, p. 234-255.

HUSSERL, Edmund. Investigações Lógicas (Segundo Volume, Parte I): Investigações para a Fenomenologia e a Teoria do Conhecimento. Trad. de Pedro M. S. Alves e Carlos Aurélio Mo-rujão. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense, 2015.

KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. Trad. de Fernando Costa Mattos. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes, 2012.

RUSSEL, Bertrand. Introdução à Filosofia Matemática. Trad. Maria Luiza X. de A. Borges. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2007.

Published

2019-07-16

Issue

Section

Papers