Why Later Wittgenstein was not a therapist

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v8iesp.60023

Palavras-chave:

Wittgenstein, philosophy, therapy, mind, internal relations, external relations

Resumo

Wittgenstein famously regarded philosophy as an activity and not as a body of doctrine. And yet within the secondary literature there is little agreement as to what Wittgenstein took the purpose of that activity to be. In this paper, I claim that the purpose of philosophical activity, at least according to the Later Wittgenstein, was to solve philosophical problems. As support for this claim, I argue that our everyday talk about the mind presents us with a philosophical problem about the mind. Focusing then on what Wittgenstein says about understanding and using his distinction between internal and external relations, I show how we can solve this problem. If my reading is accepted, then the purpose of philosophical activity, according to the later Wittgenstein, was not therapy. As such, later Wittgenstein should not be read as a therapist.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Victor Loughlin, University of Antwerp, Belgium

Postdoctoral Research Fellow. at Center for Philosophical Psychology, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Belgium.

Referências

BAZ, A. Wittgenstein on aspect perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

CRARY, A.; READ, R. (Eds.) The new Wittgenstein. London; New York: Routledge, 2000.

GLOCK, H. A Wittgenstein dictionary. New York: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.

LOUGHLIN, V. Why enactivists should care about Wittgenstein. Philosophia, 2020. (Ahead of print) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00286-3.

MACHA, J. Wittgenstein on internal and external relations: tracing all the connections. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. Wittgenstein’s razor: the cutting edge of enactivism. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 50, n. 3, p. 263-279, 2013.

MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. The myth of the quietist Wittgenstein. In: BEALE, J.; KIDD, I. (Eds.) Wittgenstein and scientism. London; New York: Routledge, 2017. p. 152-174.

STERN, D. How many Wittgensteins? In: PICHLER, A.; SAATELA, S. (Eds.) Wittgenstein: the philosopher and his works. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2006. p. 205-229.

STROLL, A. Wittgenstein. London: Oneworld Publications, 2002.

SUSSWEIN, N.; RACINE, T. R. Wittgenstein and not-just-in-the-head cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, v. 27, n. 2, p. 184-196, 2009.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Remarks on philosophical psychology - v. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. (RPP II)

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Last writings on the philosophy of psychology: the inner and the outer, vol 2. London; New York: Blackwell Publishing, 1992. (LWII)

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical Occasions: 1912-1951. Edited by J. Klagge and A. Nordmann. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993. (PO)

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge, 2001. (TLP)

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. (PI)

Abbreviations for Wittgenstein’s works

TLP = Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus;

PI = Philosophical investigations;

PO = Philosophical Occasions;

LW II = Last Writings on Philosophical Psychology, volume 2;

RPP II = Remarks on Philosophical Psychology, volume 2.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2021-07-01

Como Citar

Loughlin, V. (2021). Why Later Wittgenstein was not a therapist. Aufklärung: Revista De Filosofia, 8(esp), p.87–98. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v8iesp.60023