GENERAL WILL, SOVEREIGNTY AND POLITICAL FREEDOM IN ROUSSEAU:

SOME PROBLEMATIZATIONS

Authors

  • Eduarda Santos Silva Universidade Federal de Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v11i5.51354

Keywords:

General will, Popular sovereignty, Political freedom

Abstract

Given the union of individuals by a convention, as idealized by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The social contract, the political body that is formed will be directed by the general will, which gives unity to the people, considering the person of each associate, their assets and their freedom. Although the general will is the foundation for the maintenance of citizens' political freedom, it is possible to ask whether it will really prevail in all spheres of civil society, if the individuals who deliberate in the exercise of sovereignty are sufficiently informed about what is good common, or if they are led to accept what suits the Legislator, that is, if the general will is not manipulated, corrupted or deceived by this extraordinary figure, considered a guide endowed with superior intelligence to better lead citizens to pass good laws and preserving the common good. We are interested, then, in contrasting the very important issue of the popular participation of individuals in public subjects, highlighted by Rousseau, with the apparent limits that such participation would encounter in a republican state, and its consequences for political freedom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Eduarda Santos Silva, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Mestranda em Filosofia pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG).

References

FORTES, Luiz Roberto Salinas. Rousseau: da teoria à prática. São Paulo: Ática, 1976.

KELLY, Christopher. "To Persuade without Convincing": The Language of Rousseau's Legislator. American Journal of Political Science, v. 31, n. 2, p. 321-335, 1987.

MONTEAGUDO, Ricardo. Entre o direito e a história: a concepção do legislador em Rousseau. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2006.

MOSCATELI, Renato. Quem faz as leis na república rousseauniana?. Veritas, Porto Alegre, v. 60, n. 1, p. 106-128, jan./abr. 2015.

NASCIMENTO, Milton Meira do. O Contrato Social – entre a escala e o programa. Discurso, São Paulo, n. 17, p. 119-129, 1988.

REIS, Claudio Araujo. Vontade geral e decisão coletiva em Rousseau. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v. 33, n. 2, p. 11-34, 2010.

ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jacques. Emílio; ou, Da Educação. Trad. Sérgio Milliet. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1995.

_______. O contrato social. Tradução de Antonio de Pádua Danesi. 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.

_______. Discurso sobre a origem e os fundamentos da desigualdade entre os homens, precedido de Discurso sobre as ciências e as artes. 2. ed. Trad. Maria Ermantina Galvão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999(a).

_______. Economia (moral e política). In: Verbetes políticos da Enciclopédia. Tradução de Maria das Graças de Souza. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial; Editora UNESP, 2006.

SCOTT, John T. Politics as imitation of the divine in Rousseau’s “Social Contract”. Polity, v. 26, n. 3, p. 473-501, 1994.

STRAUSS, Leo. On the intention of Rousseau. Social Research, v. 14, n. 4, p. 455-487, 1947.

Published

2020-12-14

Issue

Section

Papers