Corporate Governance models for Innovation: a systematic literature review

Authors

  • Bárbara Gonçalves do Amaral Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
  • Francisco Gleisson Paiva Azevedo Universidade Federal do Paraná https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-1308
  • Marcos Wagner da Fonseca Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2763-9606.2023v3n2.68120

Keywords:

Corporate governance. Governance Model. Innovation. ProKnow-C. Literature review.

Abstract

Objective: The present study sought to comprehend the phases of corporate governance models for innovation and propose a research agenda.

Method: The Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) tool was used to select the articles, enabling a systematic review of the literature. Searches were carried out for publications indexed in the Scopus, Web of Science, Science direct, Ebsco and Scielo databases. The selection stage resulted in 22 articles to be discussed.

Main results: The definitions of comparative governance for innovation are not unanimous. However, what can be seen is that it is not subject to the same structures and characteristics as traditional companies, and that companies with higher levels of governance have better innovation rates. When a company has well-defined governance mechanisms, it is considered more reliable, attracting investment for innovation.

Contributions: Companies that decide to innovate will need to restructure their strategies, organizational policies and the scenarios in which innovations are developed. To do so, they will be induced to organize innovative management models. In the dynamic innovation model, innovation also requires the involvement of the board of directors in strategic management, for which corporate governance models are essential. Innovation can therefore be influenced by governance models.

Originality and Relevance: The relationship between governance models and innovation exists, but it is abstruse, firstly because there is no theory developed and accepted by innovative companies, and secondly because there are no theories that support corporate innovation. In addition, innovation governance cannot only consider specific parts because its environment is complex and multifaceted. This study sought to extend what is already known

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bárbara Gonçalves do Amaral, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)

PhD student in Accounting and Finance at the Federal University of Paraná - UFPR (2021). Master's in Accounting from the Graduate Program in Accounting Sciences at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (2019). Bachelor's degree in Accounting from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (2016). She is currently a member of the Corporate Finance Research Group of the Graduate Program in Accounting - PPGCONT - UFPR.

Francisco Gleisson Paiva Azevedo, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Master's student in Accounting at the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Specialist in Auditing and Controllership at the Faveni University Center (UNIFAVENI), Graduated in Accounting Sciences at the Vale do Acaraú State University (UVA). He has experience in accounting, working for the companies Valmir Andrade Assessoria Empresarial (2018-2019) and ETCA Escritório Técnico Contábil Andrade Ltda (2019-2022). Participant in the Accounting Research and Extension Center - NUPEC (2021) and the Junior Accounting Advisory Company - CONTAR (2021) of the Vale do Acaraú State University (UVA).

Marcos Wagner da Fonseca, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)

He has a degree in Economics from the University of São Paulo (1993), a Master's degree in Economic Theory from the State University of Maringá (2002) and a PhD in Economic Development from the Federal University of Paraná (2008). He is currently an associate professor in the Department of General and Applied Administration at the Federal University of Paraná, teaching undergraduate and postgraduate courses. He is a permanent professor in the Graduate Program in Accounting and the Graduate Program in Organizational Management, Leadership and Decision, both at UFPR. He has experience in Finance, Economics and Public Administration, working mainly on the following subjects: Financial System, Corporate Finance, Investment Analysis, Corporate Governance, Impact of Public Policies, Economics of Strategy.

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Amaral, B. G. do ., Azevedo, F. G. P., & Fonseca, M. W. da . (2024). Corporate Governance models for Innovation: a systematic literature review. Prosppectus - Perspectivas Qualitativas Em Contabilidade E Organizações, 3(2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2763-9606.2023v3n2.68120

Issue

Section

Artigos de Pesquisa