Rousseau beyond oneself: Nietzsche and the psychological profile of Rousseauism

Authors

  • Saulo Krieger Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Unifesp

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v7i1.48047

Keywords:

Iluminism, Unconscious, Soul, Cogito, Types

Abstract

Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to rehabilitate and deepen a feature of the relation between Nietzsche and Rousseau that has been relegated by the Nietzsche research, possibly by considering it obvious and by supposing that there is nothing more to say about, i. e., Nietzsche critic of Rousseau. Then, we propose to bring to light this feature, with an emphasis on the very scope the German philosopher is considering in his critical comments: the unconscious sphere, that gave directions to Rousseau'´s philosophy and to rousseauism. In this sense, we shall discuss the attack on the ancient notion of soul by Descartes in 17th century, the increasing weakening of this notion on account of the Scientific Revolution from 17th and 18th centuries, the reaction of some of 18th century representatives to what we may refer as a disenchantment of the world, the reaction of Rousseau. According to Nietzsche, the reaction of Rousseau, more than an autonomous philosophical contribution, would be an unconscious incidence of the the philosopher and his followers in ancestors devices of man-nature relation, namely, figuring a Golden era in a past of gods and heroes and ascribing to external environment threats percieved as internal ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Saulo Krieger, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Unifesp

Saulo Krieger defendeu doutorado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Unifesp em abril de 2019, a tese tendo recebido indicação para publicação e para seleção interna ao departamento tendo em vista o prêmio Anpof.

References

ANSELL PEARSON, K. Nietzsche contra Rousseau. A study of Nietzsche´s Moral and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

BURNS, W. E. Science in the Enlightenment. An Encyclopaedia. Santa Barbara CA: ABC Clio, 2003.

CHAUÍ, M. “Um anacronismo interessante”. In: Martins, A., Santiago, H. & Oliva L. C. As ilusões do eu. Spinoza e Nietzsche. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2011, p. 323-348.

HARDT, L. S. “Rousseau e Nietzsche: de como a ideia da natureza estabelece o devir”. In: Cadernos de ética e filosofia política, n. 21 (2012): Rousseau: Natureza e Sociedade, p. 207- 218.

KRIEGER, S. “Um olhar de Nietzsche ao século XVII: os subterrâneos da revolução cartesiana”. In: Cadernos Nietzsche, vol. 39. n. 3, 2018,

NIETZSCHE, F. Sämtliche Werke – Kritische Studienausgabe (KSA). Edição organizada por Giorgio Colli e Mazzino Montinari. Berlim: De Gruyter & Co., 1988, 15 vols.

__________. A gaia ciência. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.

__________. Além do bem e do mal. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1999.

__________. Aurora. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

__________. Crepúsculo dos ídolos. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2010.

__________. Humano, demasiado humano. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.

__________. O andarilho e sua sombra (Humano, demasiado humano II). Trad. Paulo César de Souza. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

VIESENTEINER, J. L. “Algumas refutações sobre a crítica de Nietzsche a Rousseau”. In: Anais do II Colóquio Rousseau, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas – IFCH, Unicamp.

Published

2020-06-07

How to Cite

Saulo Krieger. (2020). Rousseau beyond oneself: Nietzsche and the psychological profile of Rousseauism . Aufklärung, 7(1), p.129–140. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v7i1.48047