A morte do pai em Derrida e Lacan

a ambivalência do significante

Authors

  • Vanalucia Soares da Silveira Instituto Federal da Paraíba
  • Valderedo Alves da Silva Instituto Federal da Paraíba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2237-0900.2023v19.65285

Abstract

In language, the death of the father, from antiquity until today, has been the main explanation to justify the impossibility of existential origin. For Jacques Derrida, author of the theory of Deconstruction, which was based on Plato's "Phaedrus", where Socrates demonstrates to his disciple Phaedrus the danger of writing for humanity, the paternal murder would be related precisely to this modality of the linguistic sign, for she is not faithful to the logos, the only holder of Truth. Due to its absent and ambivalent condition, writing would consecrate itself as a parricidal or orphan daughter: it would kill the father or abandon him, due to the author never being present to defend his saying. For Jacques Lacan, the death of the father would be anticipated with the death of the logos: speech, precisely, the signifier, in its ambivalent condition, would make the father disappear at each enunciation. The discursive event, thought taken advantage of by Foucault (2000), would cause a scansion in the order of the signifying chain, so that with each lexical fractionation, the meanings would multiply and, in this way, the Truth would disappear. The speech would, therefore, be misleading, when promising the meeting with the father whenever faced with the substitution of the phallic signifier foreclosed from the speech. In the Lacanian perspective, there would be no father, but names, or substitutes, for himself, designated by the psychoanalyst as passwords or angels. Thus, our objective, in this work, is to discuss the father's death in Derrida and in Lacan, showing that, for both, the father's disappearance is related to the ambivalent and simulacrum condition of the linguistic sign. In this sense, our theoretical contribution will fundamentally consist of the thoughts of the authors in question: Derrida (1981; 2002) and Lacan (2011; 2005;1988). Thus, the research uses the comparative method and is located in the field of Discourse and Psychoanalysis.

 

Keywords: Speech. Writing. Father's death. Psychoanalysis. Speech.

 



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vanalucia Soares da Silveira, Instituto Federal da Paraíba

Possui Doutorado em Letras pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB); Mestrado em Letras pela Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN); Especialização em Estudos Literários e Graduação em Licenciatura em Letras, com habilitação em Língua Vernácula e Língua Inglesa, pela Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG). Atualmente, é professora efetiva e coordenadora do Curso Superior de Licenciatura em Letras do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Paraíba (IFPB), Campus Sousa; aluna do Curso de Doutorado em Letras, da Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), e integrante do Projeto de Pesquisa Literatura, Gênero e Psicanálise (LIGEPSI) - UFPB. Tem experiência na área de Letras, com ênfase para as literaturas brasileira, inglesa e africana. Suas pesquisas voltam-se para questões de gênero, sexualidade, raça e cultura, trabalhando, portanto, com teorias críticas feministas, pós-coloniais, culturais e psicanalíticas.

Valderedo Alves da Silva, Instituto Federal da Paraíba

Possui Mestrado Profissional em Sistemas Agroindustriais  e Graduação em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG).

Published

2023-02-27

How to Cite

SILVEIRA, V. S. da; SILVA, V. A. da. A morte do pai em Derrida e Lacan: a ambivalência do significante. DLCV, João Pessoa, PB, v. 19, p. e023004, 2023. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2237-0900.2023v19.65285. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/dclv/article/view/65285. Acesso em: 11 may. 2024.