Imperfecta Ratio: posible conflicts on Hegel’s logic on his lecture of Genesis 3

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v9iesp.62047

Keywords:

Logic, Filosophy of Religion, Genesis 3, Creationism, Hegel

Abstract

This article paper aims to verify a posible methodological detour made by Hegel on his work Philosophy of Religion, precisely on his Reading of Genesis 3. During the text, the german autor take a path in sense of identify the men’s nature origin and the fundamentals of the coexistence between good ande vil on his own. It happens that Hegel affirms that the snake didn’t tricked the First Couple, but just inducted them, in a way that if Adam and Eve eated from the Good and Evil Tree, both will also become God. Despite that, in this very moment Hegel abandon his logical system, avoiding to face a posible dialetics between good and evil, the two Paradise Trees, or even between Adam and Eve. So, it hemerges the hypothesis that Hegel acted conscienly, once those concepts did not fix with his logical system (critic also made by othe hegelian commentors). This paper will try to answer to the following key-question: “Did Hegel, on purpose,, made an methodological avoid on his lecture of Genesis 3?”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ataliba Carpes, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorando em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS. Mestre , Especialista e Bacharel em Direito (PUCRS). Professor das Faculdades Integradas São Judas Tadeu.

References

ARISTÓTELES. Órganon: Categorias, Da interpretação, Analíticos anteriores, Analíticos posteriores, Tópicos, Refutações sofísticas. São Paulo: Edipro, 3. ed., 2016.

BOURGEOIS, Bernard. Dialética e absoluto em Hegel. Revista Eletrônica Estudos Hegelianos, v. 2, n. 2/3, 2005, p. 2.

CARROLL, A. J. Between the Infinite and the Finite: God, Hegel and Disagreement. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 95–113, 2019. DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v11i3.2959. Disponível em: https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/view/2959. Acesso em: 17 oct. 2021.

COELHO, Humberto Schubert. O Deus “Cristão” de Hegel; a estrutura das Preleções sobre Filosofia da Religião e a reação a elas. Revista Ética e Filosofia Política, nº XXI, Volume I, jun/ 2018, p. 175-197.

DAHLSTROM, Daniel. Hegel on Logic and Religion: The Reasonableness of Christianity (BURBIDGE, John W.). The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Dec., 1994), pp. 395-397.

EBERLIN, Marcos Nogueira. Foresight: How the Chemistry of Life Reveals Planning and Purpose. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute Press, 2019.

ERLEWINE, Robert. Samuel Hirsch, Hegel, and the Legacy of Ethical Monotheism._Harvard Theological Review, v. 113, n. 1, p. 89-110, 2020.

EUCLIDES. Os elementos. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2009.

FACKENHEIM, Emil L. The Religious Dimension in Hegel’s Thought. Boston: Beacon, 1967.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Ciência da lógica: 1. A doutrina do ser. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2016.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Enciclopédia das ciências filosóficas em compêndio: 1830. São Paulo: Loyola, 1995.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Fé e Saber. São Paulo: Hedra, 2007.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Filosofia de la religión. Madrid:Trotta, 2018.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Filosofia do Direito. Porto Alegre: Editora Fênix, 2021.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. O Espírito do Cristianismo e seu Destino. Porto Alegre: Editora Fênix, 2021.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Vida de Jesus. São Paulo: Editora Clandestina, 2019.

HODGSON, Peter. Hegel & Christian Theology: A Reading of the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press, 2005.

LOURENÇO, Adauto. Gênesis 1 e 2: a mão de Deus na Criação. São Paulo: Fiel, 2018.

MUELLER, Gustav E. The Hegel Legend of" Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis"._Journal of the History of Ideas, p. 411-414, 1958.

O’REGAN, Cyril. Hegelian Philosophy of Religion and Eckhartian Mysticism. In: HODGSON, Peter. Hegel and Christian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

WEBER, Thadeu. Hegel: Liberdade, Estado e História. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1993

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-03

How to Cite

Carpes, A. (2022). Imperfecta Ratio: posible conflicts on Hegel’s logic on his lecture of Genesis 3. Aufklärung, 9(esp), p.55–68. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v9iesp.62047

Issue

Vol. 9 No. esp (2022): Philosophy of Religion by Hegel and Feuerbach

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal general policy

1.This journal works under a Creative Commons License aplied to online journals. That icence can be read in the following link: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

2.Accordingly to this License, a)the journal declares that authors hold the copyright of their articles without restrictions, and they can archieve them as post-print elsewhere. b)the journal allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.

 

Metadata Policy for information describing items in the repository

1. Anyone may access the metadata free of charge at anytime.
2.The metadata may be re-used in any medium without prior permission, even commercial purposes provided the OAI Identifier or a link to the original metadata record are given, under the terms of a CC BY license refered for the Journal.