Imperfecta Ratio: posible conflicts on Hegel’s logic on his lecture of Genesis 3

Abstract

This article paper aims to verify a posible methodological detour made by Hegel on his work Philosophy of Religion, precisely on his Reading of Genesis 3. During the text, the german autor take a path in sense of identify the men’s nature origin and the fundamentals of the coexistence between good ande vil on his own. It happens that Hegel affirms that the snake didn’t tricked the First Couple, but just inducted them, in a way that if Adam and Eve eated from the Good and Evil Tree, both will also become God. Despite that, in this very moment Hegel abandon his logical system, avoiding to face a posible dialetics between good and evil, the two Paradise Trees, or even between Adam and Eve. So, it hemerges the hypothesis that Hegel acted conscienly, once those concepts did not fix with his logical system (critic also made by othe hegelian commentors). This paper will try to answer to the following key-question: “Did Hegel, on purpose,, made an methodological avoid on his lecture of Genesis 3?”.