Colheita de pinhões da Pewen (Araucaria araucana): uma situação significativa que liga as crianças Mapuche à Natureza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1981-1268.2020v14n1.47620Resumo
Dado que a conservação ambiental dependerá das gerações jovens, considerar seus conhecimentos e formas de se conectar com a natureza é substancial. Uma abordagem inicial é analisar as situações naturais significativas (SNS) que geram conexões “humano-natureza”. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram investigar o conhecimento que as crianças de uma comunidade mapuche têm sobre a coleta de Pewen, analisar seu papel como uma experiência natural significativa (SNS) e verificar se promove conexões “humano-natureza”. Utilizando o referencial do método ACHUNAS, e com base na análise de desenhos e entrevistas de 8 meninos e 11 meninas, foram identificadas 9 qualidades que tornam a coleta de pinhões um SNS e 7 habilidades das crianças que indicam sua conexão com a natureza. Foram detectadas práticas que favorecem a regeneração de Pewen, que estariam caindo em desuso. Esses resultados, somados ao estado crítico de conservação de Pewen e sua importância cultural para as comunidades mapuches, mostram a necessidade de trabalhar com crianças, promovendo práticas sustentáveis de coleta. No futuro, será útil incluir o conhecimento de mais crianças para cobrir todas as qualidades associadas ao SNS e as habilidades que manifestam sua conexão com a natureza, para desenvolver atividades significativas de educação ambiental para esses jovens.
Downloads
Referências
Barraza L. 1999 Children’s Drawings About the Environment. Environ Educ Res 5: 49–66.
Berkes F. & I.J. Davidson-Hunt. 2010. Innovating through commons use: community-based enterprises. International Journal of de Commons 4: 1-7.
Berkes F. & D. Jolly. 2001. Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 18. [online]URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18/
Berkes F., J. Colding & C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptative management. Ecological Applications 10(5):1251-1262.
Blancas J, A Casas, S Rangel-Landa, A Moreno-Calles & I Torres. 2010. Plant Management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot 64(4):287-302.
Bowker R. 2007. Children’s perceptions and learning about tropical rainforests: an analysis of their drawings. Environmental Education Research, 13:1, 75-96. DOI: 10.1080/13504620601122731
Caballero, J. 2003. Utilización de semillas de Araucaria araucana por una comunidad pewenche de Lonquimay, IX Región. Memoria Ingeniería Forestal. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales. Universidad de Chile. 77p.
Cardoso B, A. H. Ladio, S. M. Dutrus & M. Lozada. 2015. Preference and calorific value of fuelwood species in rural populations in northwestern Patagonia. Biomass and Bioenergy 81: 514-520.
Chambers D.W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: the draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67, pp. 255-26
Código de ética para la investigación, la investigación-acción y la colaboración etnocientífica en América Latina. Versión dos. 2015. Etnobiología, Vol. 13, Suplemento 1.
Codonho C.G. 2007. Aprendendo entre pares: a transmissão horizontal de saberes entre as crianças indígenas Galibi-Marworno (Amapá, Brasil). Disertación de Maestría. Florianópolis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/90189
Conrad E. 2017. Human and social dimension of landscape stewardship, in The Science and Practice of Landscape Stewardship, eds C. Bieling & T. Plieninger. Cambridge University Press, 38–53.
Dell Clark C. 1999. The auto-driven experience: a photographic viewfinder into children’s experience. Visual Sociology, 14, 39–50.
Eyssartier C., A. H. Ladio & M. Lozada. 2008. Cultural Transmission of Traditional Knowledge in two populations of North- of North-western Patagonia. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-4-25
Eyssartier C., L. Margutti & M. Lozada. 2017. Plant Knowledge in Children Who Inhabit Diverse Socio- Ecological Environments in Northwestern Patagonia. Diverse socio-ecological environments in. J. Ethnobiol. 37, 81–96.
Fernández-Llamazares Á., I. Díaz-Reviriego, M. Guèze, M. Cabeza, A. Pyhälä & V. Reyes-García. 2016. Local perceptions as a guide for the sustainable management of natural resources: empirical evidence from a small-scale society in Bolivian Amazonia. Ecology and Society 21(1):2.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08092-210102
Fraser D.J., T.Coon, M.R. Prince, R. Dion, L. Bernatchez. 2006. Integrating traditional and evolutionary knowledge in biodiversity conservation: a population level case study. Ecol. Soc. 11 (2), 4
Gamradt J. 1995. Jamaican children’s representations of tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 22, 735–762.
Gaoue O.G. & T. Ticktin. 2009. Fulani knowledge of the ecological impacts of Khaya senegalensis (Meliaceae) foliage harvest in Benin and its implications for sustainable harvest. Econ. Bot. 63, 256–270
García M. C., M Navas & I Cuadrado. 2003. ‘Los turistas se divierten, los inmigrantes trabajan’: Una descripción de dos grupos sociales a través del dibujo infantil. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 3, 59–79.
Garnett S. T. 2018. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374.
Ghazoul J. 2007. Placing humans at the heart of conservation. Biotropica 39, 565–566
Ghimire S., D. McKey & Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas. 2004. Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management ofmedicinal plants in the Himalayas ofNepal: implica- tions for conservation. Ecol. Soc. 9 (3), 6.
Giusti M., U. Svane, C.M. Raymond & T.H. Beery. 2018. A Framework to Assess Where and How Children Connect to Nature. Front. Psychol. 8:2283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02283
Gómez-Baggethun E., S.Mingorría, V. Reyes-García, L. Calvet & C. Montes. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology : The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 24(3), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x
González-Insuasti MS & J Caballero. 2007. Managing plant resources: How intensive can it be? Human Ecol 35:303–314.
Grosfeld J., Barthélémy D. & Brion C. 1999. Architectural variations of Araucaria araucana (Molina) K. Koch (Araucariaceae) in its natural habitat. In: M.H. Kurmann and A.R. Hemsley (editors). The Evolution of Plant Architecture, pp. 109-122. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Herrmann M.T. 2005. Knowledge, values, uses and management of the Araucaria araucana forest by the indigenous Mapuche Pewenche people: A basis for collaborative natural resource management in southern Chile. Nat. Resour. Forum 29, 120–134.
Hunecke M., A. Blobaum, E. Matthies & R. Hoger. 2001. Responsibility and environment: ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environ. Behav. 33, 830–852. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973269
Kaiser F. G., T. Hartig, A. Brugger & C. Duvier. 2011. Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: an application of the campbell paradigm. Environ. Behav. 45, 369–398. doi: 10.1177/0013916511422444
Kendrick M. & R. McKay. 2016. Drawings as an alternative way of understanding young children’s constructions of literacy. Lit. Multimodality Across Glob. Sites 56–80. doi:10.4324/9780203713556
Kradolfer S. 2000. «Muy lindos látigos tenés vos»: la artesanía del cuero entre los mapuche argentinos. Société suisse des Américanistes. Bulletin 64-65, pp. 61-68
Ladio A. H. & M. Lozada. 2004. Summer cattle transhumance and wild edible plant gathering in a Mapuche community of Northwestern Patagonia.Human Ecology, 32(2), 225-240.
Ladio A. H. 2017. Ethnobiology and research on Global Environmental Change : what distinctive contribution can we make ? Ethnobiol. Conserv. 7, 1–8.
Ladio A. H. & S. Molares. 2016. Capítulo 29.Etnoconservacionismo y prácticas locales en Patagonia: avances y perspectivas. (pp 649-672). En: Domesticación en el Continente Americano. Historia y perspectivas del manejo de recursos genéticos en el Nuevo Mundo. Alejandro Casas, Juan Torres-Guevara y Fabiola Parra (Editores). Universidad Agraria La Molina. IIES, Lima, Perú (en prensa).
López-Hoffman L., I.E. Monroe, E.Narváez, M. Martínez-Ramos & D.D. Ackerly. 2006. Sustainability of Mangrove Harvesting: How do Harvesters' Perceptions Differ from Ecological Analysis? Ecol. Soc. 11 (12), 14
Loureiro A.C.J., E. de Lima Araújo, O.G. Gaoue & U.P. Albuquerque. 2018. Science of the Total Environment How can local representations of changes of the availability in natural resources assist in targeting conservation? Sci. Total Environ. 628–629, 642–649.
Lozada M. & N. Carro. 2016. Embodied Action Improves Cognition in Children: Evidence from a Study Based on Piagetian Conservation Tasks. Front. Psychol. 7:393. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00393
Lozada M., A. H. Ladio & M. Weigandt. 2006. Cultural Transmission of Ethnobotanical Knowledge in a Rural Community of Northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Economic Botany 60(4) pp. 374-385. DOI: 10.1663/0013-0001
Malchiodi C. A. 1998. Understanding children’s drawings. London (Jessica Kingsley Publishers).
Matsuba M. K., M. W. Pratt, J. E. Norris, E. Mohle, S. Alisat & D. P. McAdams. 2012. Environmentalism as a context for expressing identity and generativity: patterns among activists and uninvolved youth and midlife adults. J. Pers. 80, 1091–1115. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00765.x
Palacios M. G. & A. C. Hecht. 2009. Los niños como interlocutores en la investigación antropológica. Consideraciones a partir de un taller de memorias con niños y niñas indígenas. Tellus, 17, 163-186. Campo Grande - MS
Parque Nacional Lanín, sitio web: www.pnlanin.org/cultura. Última consulta 4 de agosto de 2019.
Pellier A. S., J. A. Wells, N. K. Abram, D. Gaveau & E. Meijaard. 2014. Through the eyes of children: Perceptions of environmental change in tropical forests. PLoS One 9.
Piaget, J. 1952. The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York, International Universities Press.
Piaget J. 1969. The Child's Conception of the World. London, Kegan Paul.
Raymond C. M., M. Giusti & S. Barthel. 2017. An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: toward embodied ecosystems, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1312300
Reis M. S., A. H. Ladio & N. Peroni. 2014. Landscapes with Araucaria in South America: Evidence for a Cultural Dimension. Ecology and Society 19 (2):43. doi: 10.5751/ES-06163- 190243
Remorini C. 2015. El papel de los niños en la obtención, elaboración, circulación y consumo de alimentos en comunidades Mbya (Argentina). Anthropology of food, 9 [Online], http://journals.openedition.org/aof/7770
Remorini C. 2010. Crecer en movimiento. Abordaje etnográfico de la crianza y el desarrollo infantil en comunidades Mbya (Misiones, Argentina). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales sobre Niñez y Juventud 8(2) : 961-980.
Rozzi R. 2016. Bioética global y ética biocultural. Cuadernos de Bioética 27: 339-355.
Rozzi R. 2012. Biocultural ethics: recovering the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits, and habitats. Environ Ethics 34:27–50
Sanguinetti, J. (Ed.). 2018. Informe Técnico: Caracterización desecación del dosel y sanidad de araucaria araucana en argentina. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.14227.78889
Sanguinetti J. 2016. Climate Change , wildfires and non-native granivores interactions in Araucaria araucana forests, Argentina. Informe Técnico del área de conservación, Parque Nacional Lanín. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1094.9527
Schmidt I.B. & T Ticktin. 2012. When lessons from population models and local ecological knowledge coincide – effects of flower stalk harvesting in the Brazilian savanna. Biol. Conserv. 152, 187–195
Setalaphruk C. & L.L. Price. 2007. Children's traditional ecological knowledge of wild food resources: a case study in a rural village in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. DOI : 10.1186/1746-4269-3-33
Simoni A. & M. C. Perea. 2016. Las plantas que curan: el lugar que ocupan las plantas medicinales desde la cosmovisión de los escolares de la Comunidad India Quilmes (Tucuman-argentina). Mundo de antes 10, 143–172.
Stern P.C. 2000. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Sullivan A., A. Brewis & A. Wutich. 2018. Studying Children's Cultural Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Environment, Health, and Food: Methods for Ethnoecological Research with Children. Journal of Ethnobiology 38(2), 276-293. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-38.2.276
Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Advance unedited version. 2019 {ENLACE}
Tella J. L., S. A. Lambertucci, K. L. Speziale & F. Hiraldo. 2016.Large-scale impacts of multiple co-occurring invaders on monkey puzzle forest regeneration, native seed predators and their ecological interactions. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 6, 1–15.
Thomas G. & A. Silk. 1990. An Introduction to the Psychology of Children's Drawings. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Thompson E. & F. J. Varela. 2001. Radical embodiment: neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 418–425. doi: 10.1016/S1364- 6613(00)01750-2
Publicado
Versões
- 2021-05-20 (2)
- 2020-03-31 (1)
