Subjects of and at Risk During the Pandemic.

Analysis of the Inferences Made by Health Personnel Regarding the Acceptance of the Vaccination Against Sars-Cov-2

Authors

  • José Alejandro Meza-Palmeros Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS)
  • Graciela Freyermuth-Enciso Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2447-9837.2022.n14.64372

Abstract

The objective is to analyze and describe the perceptions of health workers (HW) regarding the interaction they have had with the population during the pandemic. This investigation parted from the analysis of the possibility of rejection or acceptance of the vaccination against SARS-Cov-2, the experience of being attacked and the attributed motives. A digital survey was applied to 510 HW. 34% suffered some type of aggression, attributing it to the ignorance of the population. 71.5% indicated that vaccination would be accepted by the majority. We identified three explanatory modalities: deterministic, moral and agency. The results show an indirect approach to their perception of the population and the way they interact with them, both important elements of risk perception.

KEYWORDS:

Covid-19; vaccination; risk perception; doctor-patient relationship.

Picture: Foto: Dirección de Salud Municipal SCLC. (13 de mayo de 2020).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

José Alejandro Meza-Palmeros, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS)

Professor and researcher at the Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, Northeast regional unit

Graciela Freyermuth-Enciso, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS)

Research professor at the Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, southeast regional unit.

Published

2023-01-30