The Dialectics of Development: A Marxist Philosophical Analysis of the Role and Limits of the Contemporary Market Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i3.77585Palavras-chave:
Dialectics, Marxist Philosophy, Contemporary Market Economy, Socialist oriented market economyResumo
The development of the market economy in nations pursuing a “Socialist” orientation has created an academic paradox: how can a philosophical system founded upon a critique of capitalism be reconciled with the market mechanism, which is the primary driver of capitalism? This research aims to analyze “Marxist dialectics” as a theoretical framework to address and manage this inherent contradiction. We argue that Marxist philosophy offers a dual perspective: firstly, it recognizes the market economy as a “historically necessary instrument” for the development of productive forces to a high level; secondly, it clearly identifies the market’s “immanent contradictions” (exploitation, alienation, inequality). Based on this, Marxist philosophy provides the foundation for the model of the “Socialist-Oriented Market Economy” by maintaining the crucial controlling role of the Socialist State in regulating inequality and guiding development toward humanitarian goals. The analysis demonstrates that the development of the market economy within the Socialist context is not an abandonment of Marxism, but rather a creative application of dialectics to historical reality, transforming the market instrument from a spontaneous system into a goal-oriented means, serving the comprehensive development of humanity. Future research is proposed to quantitatively analyze the effectiveness of these controlling instruments.
Downloads
Referências
Freeman, A. (1996). Price, value and profit-a continuous, general, treatment. In Marx and non-equilibrium economics (pp. 225-279). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Halliday, F. (1990). The Ends of Cold War. New Left Review, 180(22), 5-66.
Horwitz, S. (1996). Money, money prices, and the socialist calculation debate. Advances in Austrian Economics, (3), 59-77.
McCarthy, G. E. (2017). Marx and Social Justice: Ethics and Natural Law in the Critique of Political Economy. In Marx and Social Justice. Brill.
Nee, V. (2000). The role of the state in making a market economy. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 64-88.
Röpke, W. (2014). A humane economy: the social framework of the free market. Open Road Media.
Tan, J. (2024). Basic Principles of Marxism and the Theory and Practice of Social Development in Contemporary China.
Westra, R. (2012). ‘Capital’ as dialectical economic theory. Journal of Australian Political Economy, (70), 233-250.
Wise, R. D., & Niell, M. C. (2021). Capital, science, technology and development of productive forces in contemporary capitalism. Monthly Review-An Independent Socialist Magazine, 72(10), 33-46
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Política de Direito Autoral para os itens publicados pela Revista:
1.Esta revista é regida por uma Licença da Creative Commons aplicada a revistas eletrônicas. Esta licença pode ser lida no link a seguir: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2.Consonante a essa politica, a revista declara que os autores são os detentores do copyright de seus artigos sem restrição, e podem depositar o pós-print de seus artigos em qualquer repositório ou site.
Política de Direito de Uso dos Metadados para informações contidas nos itens do repositório
1. Qualquer pessoa e/ou empresa pode acessar os metadados dos itens publicados gratuitamente e a qulquer tempo.
2.Os metadados podem ser usados sem licença prévia em qualquer meio, mesmo comercialmente, desde que seja oferecido um link para o OAI Identifier ou para o artigo que ele desceve, sob os termos da licença CC BY aplicada à revista.
Os autores que têm seus trabalhos publicados concordam que com todas as declarações e normas da Revista e assumem inteira responsabilidade pelas informações prestadas e ideias veiculadas em seus artigos, em conformidade com a Política de Boas Práticas da Revista.