Pragmatism and Economics: A Flexible Approach to Contemporary Challenges

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i2.76753

Palavras-chave:

Pragmatism, economics, economic policy, economic methodology, decision-making

Resumo

Pragmatism in economics offers a flexible approach focused on addressing complex economic issues through practical, context-specific solutions. Unlike traditional economic theories reliant on rigid assumptions, pragmatism emphasizes evaluating policies and decisions based on their real-world outcomes rather than strict adherence to theoretical principles. Historically, pragmatism has influenced economic policy formation, particularly during crises or instability, when innovative and practical solutions are prioritized. Theoretically, pragmatism promotes a synthesis of quantitative and qualitative methods, encouraging economists to adopt flexible approaches using data and real-world contexts for decision-making. In practice, this approach has been applied to designing fiscal, monetary, and trade policies, enabling nations to navigate rapid changes in the global economy. Particularly in the modern context, with challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and technological disruption, pragmatism provides an effective framework for balancing short-term and long-term interests. By prioritizing practicality and adaptability, pragmatism in economics not only addresses pressing issues but also fosters sustainable development in a constantly evolving world.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Thanh Ngo, Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade

Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Referências

Bastalich, W. (2010). Knowledge economy and research innovation. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 845-857.

Rooney, D., Hearn, G., & Ninan, A. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook on the knowledge economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Davis, D. R., & Dingel, J. I. (2019). A spatial knowledge economy. American Economic Review, 109(1), 153-170.

Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral economics and public policy: A pragmatic perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1-33.

Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2006). Behavioral economics. Econometric Society Monographs, 42, 181.

Frankel, P. S. (2016). Pragmatism as ontology, not (just) epistemology: Exploring the full horizon of pragmatism as an approach to IR theory. International Studies Review, 18(3), 508-527.

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053.

Headey, D. (2009). Appraising a post-Washington paradigm: What Professor Rodrik means by policy reform.

Hodgson, G. M. (2012). Thorstein Veblen: The father of evolutionary and institutional economics. Thorstein Veblen: Economics for an age of crises, 283-296.

Chen, J., & Galbraith, J. K. (2012). A common framework for evolutionary and institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 46(2), 419-428.

Kaufman, B. E. (2003). The organization of economic activity: Insights from the institutional theory of John R. Commons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(1), 71-96.

Kołodko, G. W. (2021). Economics of new pragmatism in contemporary society: Identity, aims, method. Polish Sociological Review, 216(4), 431-450.

Morgan, D. L. (2020). Pragmatism as a basis for grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 25(1), 64.

Ormerod, R. (2006). The history and ideas of pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(8), 892-909.

Yefimov, V. (2004). On pragmatist institutional economics.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2025-11-27

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.