CERTAIN FORMS OF EXPRESSION OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49950Palavras-chave:
judicial precedent, judicial practice, law.Resumo
The relevance of the studied issues is associated with the increased interaction of the legal systems of our time. The research methodology is based on the dialectic and the systematic approach that follows from it. The article authors take into account the pluralism of the concepts involved in the study. The classic case law is applied to the Anglo-Saxon legal family. The terms judicial precedent and judicial practice are understood synonymously, but only if the judicial practice is created by the highest judicial instances.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Arkhipov V.V., Polyakov A.V., Timoshyna E. V. (2012). Adaptation of the Experience of Case Law Systems to the Russian Legal System: to the Problem Formulation. University News. Jurisprudence. 2012. No. 3. P. 117.
Bankowski Z., MacCormick N, Mo-rawski L, Miguel A. (1997). Rationales for Precedent. MacCormick D. and Summers R. (eds.), 1997.- P. 497.
Bellinger J.P., III. (2012). Recognition of Foreign Judgments: Balancing International, Federal, State, and Commercial Interests. Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: 2012 Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium. BJIL, 2012.- P. 6.
Bradley C. (2008). Intent, Presumptions, and Non-Self-Executing Treaties / C. Bradley. The American Journal of International Law. 2008. - Vol. 102. - P. 541- 546.
Charyev M.R. (2002). Judiciary Functions / M.R. Charyev. Justice in the Russian Federation. - 2002. – No. 3. - P. 7-11.
Ferencz B. (1983). Enforcing International Law / B. Ferencz. - Vol. I. - L., 1983.-P.308-317.
Gubaydullin A.R. (2017). Continuity in the Development of Legal System / A.R. Gubaidullin. Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). - 2017. - No. 3. - Issue Comparative Law. - P. 81-90
Kurnosova V.V. (2017). Judicial Functions: Continuity and Development / Kurnosova V.V.. The Baltic Humanitarian Journal. - 2017. - No. 4 (21). - P. 476-478.
Shreuer Ch. (1981). Decisions of International Institutions before Domestic Courts. / Ch.Shreuer. - L. 1981. -P. 143
Sinyukov V.N. (2010). Russian Legal System. Introduction to the General Theory / V.N. Sinyukov - 2nd ed. - M., 2010. - P. 76
Bankowski Z., MacCormick N, Mo-rawski L, Miguel A. (1997). Rationales for Precedent. MacCormick D. and Summers R. (eds.), 1997.- P. 497.
Bellinger J.P., III. (2012). Recognition of Foreign Judgments: Balancing International, Federal, State, and Commercial Interests. Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: 2012 Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium. BJIL, 2012.- P. 6.
Bradley C. (2008). Intent, Presumptions, and Non-Self-Executing Treaties / C. Bradley. The American Journal of International Law. 2008. - Vol. 102. - P. 541- 546.
Charyev M.R. (2002). Judiciary Functions / M.R. Charyev. Justice in the Russian Federation. - 2002. – No. 3. - P. 7-11.
Ferencz B. (1983). Enforcing International Law / B. Ferencz. - Vol. I. - L., 1983.-P.308-317.
Gubaydullin A.R. (2017). Continuity in the Development of Legal System / A.R. Gubaidullin. Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). - 2017. - No. 3. - Issue Comparative Law. - P. 81-90
Kurnosova V.V. (2017). Judicial Functions: Continuity and Development / Kurnosova V.V.. The Baltic Humanitarian Journal. - 2017. - No. 4 (21). - P. 476-478.
Shreuer Ch. (1981). Decisions of International Institutions before Domestic Courts. / Ch.Shreuer. - L. 1981. -P. 143
Sinyukov V.N. (2010). Russian Legal System. Introduction to the General Theory / V.N. Sinyukov - 2nd ed. - M., 2010. - P. 76
Downloads
Publicado
2019-12-24
Como Citar
R. GUBAYDULLIN, A. .; V. KURNOSOVA, V. . CERTAIN FORMS OF EXPRESSION OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 7, 2019. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49950. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/49950. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Seção Livre
