A CONCEPÇÃO PROTOMODERNISTA DE HEGEL DA FILOSOFIA COMO CIÊNCIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v11i4.52207Palavras-chave:
Filosofia científica, Hegel, Filosofia marxista, História da Filosofia da CiênciaResumo
Afirmo que a recepção de Hegel no subcampo da história e da filosofia da ciência foi impedida, em parte, por um mal-entendido de suas visões metafilosóficas maduras. Levando em conta as posições influentes de Alan Richardson sobre a ascensão da filosofia científica como um exemplo de tal mal-entendido, eu argumento que as visões metafilosóficas do Hegel maduro o colocam muito mais perto dos filósofos que são comumente tomados como paradigmas da filosofia científica do que normalmente se pensa. Hegel é comumente apresentado como alguém que concebeu a filosofia como uma ciência que se apoiava no gênio solitário do pensador individual, e como uma ciência cujas proposições não podiam e não deveriam ser tornadas acessíveis “ao povo”. Contra essa visão, argumento que Hegel, de fato, pensava que a filosofia era uma atividade totalmente anti-individualista, e que ele enfatizou a importância da acessibilidade intersubjetiva do discurso filosófico. Argumento que, quando reconstruímos cuidadosamente as razões de Hegel para sua ruptura com Schelling, e se prestarmos atenção aos seus pronunciamentos metafilosóficos explícitos, podemos ver que ele de fato aderiu ao que chamo de concepção "protomodernista" da filosofia como ciência. Concluo apontando como a descaracterização de Hegel serviu para obscurecer a existência de uma vertente da filosofia científica que surgiu por meio de uma crítica imanente de Hegel, a saber, a filosofia marxista.
Downloads
Referências
Al-‘Alim, Mahmud Amin. 1971. Falsafat al-Mosadafa [Philosophy of Chance]. Cairo, Egypt:
Dar Al-Ma‘arf.
Agassi, Joseph. 2008. Science and its History: A Reassessment of the Historiography. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Bakhurst, David. 2018. “On Lenin’s Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Studies in East
European Thought 70: 107-119.
Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Hegel. New York and London: Routledge.
Bird, Alexander. 2008. Thomas Kuhn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bird, Alexander. 2015. "Kuhn and the Historiography of Science." In Kuhn's Structures of
Scientific Revolutions 50 Years On, edited by William J. Devlin and Alisa Bokulich, 23-38. New York: Springer
Burbidge, John. 2006. “New Directions in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature.” In Hegel: New
Directions, edited by Katerina Deligiorgi, 177-192. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1993. “Hegel on the Interaction between Science and Philosophy.” In Hegel
and Newtonianism, edited by Michael J. Petry, 61-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bunge, Mario. 2012. Evaluating Philosophies. Dordrecht: Springer.
Colletti, Lucio.1979. Marxism and Hegel. Translated by Lawrence Garner. London: Verso.
Coniglione, Francesco. 2007. “The Place of Polish Scientific Philosophy in the European
Context.” Polish Journal of Philosophy 1.1:7-27.
Daston, Lorrain. 1992. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective.” Social Studies of Science
: 597-618.
von Engelhardt, Dietrich. 1993. “Hegel on Chemistry and the Organic Sciences.” In Hegel and
Newtonianism, edited by Michael J. Petry, 657-665. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Engels, Frederick. 1941. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical German Philosophy. New York: International Publishers.
Ferrini, Cinzia. 2009. "Reason Observing Nature." In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by Kenneth Westphal, 92-135. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing.
Heidelberger, Michael. 2006. “Kantianism and Realism: Alois Riehl (Moritz Schlick).” In The
Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Michael Friedman and Alfred Nordmann, 227-247. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1969. Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands, NJ:
Humanities Press International, Inc.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970. Philosophy of Nature, Volume 1. Edited and translated by Michael John
Petry. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971a.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I, Werke 18.Werke in zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971b.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie II, Werke 19. Werke in
zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971c.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie III, Werke 20. Werke in
zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction. Translated by
H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1976. Logic: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part I.
Translated by William Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1984. Hegel: The Letters. Edited and translated by Clark Butler and Christiane
Seiler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hegel, G. W.F. 1995a. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 1: Greek Philosophy to Plato. Translated by E. S. Haldane. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1995b. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 2: Plato and the
Platonists. Translated by E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. Lincoln and London:
University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1995c. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 3: Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Translated by E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G. W. F., and F. W. J. Schelling 2000. "The Critical Journal of Philosophy, Introduction: On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism Generally, and its Relationship to the Present State of Philosophy in Particular." In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, edited and translated by George di Giovanni and H.S. Harris.
Houlgate, Stephen. 1990. "World History as the Progress of Consciousness: An Interpretation of
Hegel's Philosophy of History." The Owl of Minerva 22.1: 69-80.
Howard, Don. 2003. “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North
American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury.” In Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by Gary Hardcastle and Alan Richardson, 25-93. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1965. "Philosophy as Rigorous Science." In Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, translated by Quentin Lauer, 71-147. New York: Harper & Row.
Kaufman, Walter. 1972. "The Hegel Myth and its Method." In Hegel: A Collection of Critical
Essays, edited by Alasdair MacIntyre, 21-60. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday & Company.
Kircz, Joost. 1998. “Engels and the Natural Sciences: A Starting Point.” Science & Society 62.1:
-78.
Klein, Alexander. 2015. “Science, Religion, and ‘The Will to Believe’.” HOPOS: The Journal of
the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science5.1: 72-117.
Lawler, James, and Vladimir Shtinov. 1988. "Hegel's Method of Doing Philosophy Historically:
A Reply." Doing Philosophy Historically, edited by Peter H. Hare, 267-280. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Lukács, Georg. 1975. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin Press.
Lunacharsky, A. V. 1967. Revolutionary Silhouettes. Translated and edited by Michael Glenny with an introduction by Isaac Deutscher. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Mueller, Gustav E. 1958. "The Hegel Legend of 'Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis'." Journal of the
History of Ideas 19.3: 411-414.
Murray, Patrick. 1988. Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Humanities Press..
Neuber, Matthias. 2014. “Critical Realism in Perspective: Remarks on a Neglected Current in
Neo-Kantian Epistemology.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, edited by M.C. Galavotti et al., 657-673. Dordrecht: Springer.
Neurath, Otto. 1962. “Unified Science as Encyclopedic Integration.” In International
Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I, 1-27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Carnap, and Hans Hahn. 1973. "WissenschaftlicheWeltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis." In Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology, edited by Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, 299-318. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Oizerman, T. I., and A. S. Bogomolov. 1986. Principles of the Theory of the Historical Process
in Philosophy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Omodeo, Pietro D. 2016 “After Nikolai Bukharin: History of Science and Cultural Hegemony at
the Threshold of the Cold War.” History of the Human Sciences 29.4-5:13-34.
Pinkard, Terry. 2005. “Speculative Naturphilosophie and the Development of the Empirical
Sciences: Hegel’s Perspective.” In Continental Philosophy of Science, edited by Gary Gutting, 19-34. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Plekhanov, Georgi. 1947. The Development of the Monist View of History. London: Lawrence &
Wishart.
Posch, Thomas. 2011. “Hegel and the Sciences.” In A Companion to Hegel, edited by Stephen
Houlgate and Michael Baur, 177-202. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Reisch, George A. 1991. “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?” Philosophy of Science 58.2:264-
Reisch, George A. 1997. “How Postmodern was Neurath’s Idea of Unity of Science?” Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28.3:439-451.
Reisch, George A. 2003. “Disunity in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.” In
Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by Gary Hardcastle and Alan Richardson, 197-215. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy
Slopes of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reisch, George A. 2009. “Three Kinds of Political Engagements in Philosophy of Science.”
Science & Education 18.2:191-197.
Reisch, George A. 2012. “The Paranoid Style in American History of Science.” Theoria: An
International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 27.3:323-342.
Reisch. George A. 2014. “When Structure Met Sputnik: On the Cold War Origins of The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Science and Technology in the Global Cold War,
edited by Naomi Oreskes and John Krige, 371-392. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Reisch, George A. 2016a. “Telegrams and Paradigms: On Cold War Geopolitics and The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Science Studies During the Cold War and
Beyond: Paradigms Defected, edited by Elena Aronova and Simone Turchetti, 25-53.
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisch, George A. 2016b. “Aristotle in the Cold War: On the Origins of Thomas Kuhn’s The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Kuhn’s ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ at
Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, edited by Robert J. Richards, and Lorrain Daston,
-29. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reisch, George A. 2017. “Pragmatic Engagements: Philipp Frank and James Bryant Conant on
Science, Education, and Democracy.” Studies in Eastf European Thought 69:227-244.
Richardson, Alan. 1997. "Towards a History of Scientific Philosophy." Perspectives on Science 5.3: 418-451.272-291.
Richardson, Alan. 2002. “Philosophy as Science: The Modernist Agenda of Philosophy of
Science, 1900-1950.” In The Scope of Logic: Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, edited by Peter Gärdenfors, Jan Wolenski, and K. Kijania-Placek, 621-639. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Richardson, Alan. 2008. “Scientific Philosophy as a Topic for History of Science.” ISIS 99.1: 88-
Richardson, Alan. 2010. "Ernst Cassirer and Michael Friedman: Kantian or Hegelian Dynamics
of Reason?" In Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science, edited by Mary Domski and Michael Dickson, 279-294. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Richardson, Alan. 2012. “Occasions for an Empirical History of Philosophy of Science:
American Philosophers of Science at Work in the 1950s and 1960s.” HOPOS:The
Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2: 1-20.
Saito, Kohei. 2017. Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of
Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Sheehan, Helena. 2017. Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History (2nd Ed,).
London: Verso.
Smart, H.R. 1962. Philosophy and its History: A Critical Examination of the Permanent Value to
Philosophy of its own History. La Salle, Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Stanley, John L. 1997. “Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature.” Science & Society
4: 449-473.
Stump, David J. 2009. “Pragmatism, Activism, and the Icy Slopes of Logic in George Reisch’s
Portrait of the Philosophy of Science as a Young Field.” Science & Education 18.2:169-
Inc.
Uebel, Thomas. 2009. “Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical
Empiricism.” Science & Education 18.2:161-168.
Valentinov, Nikolay. 1968. Encounters with Lenin. Translated by P. Rosta and B. Pearce: New
York: Oxford University Press.
Viola, Enrico. 2013. “The Specificity of Logical Empiricism in the Twentieth-Century History of
Scientific Philosophy.” HOPOS:The Journal of the International Society for the History
of Philosophy of Science 3: 191-209.
Wandschneider, Dieter. 2013. “Philosophy of Nature.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel,
edited by Allegra de Laurentiis and Jeffrey Edwards,103-126. London: Bloomsbury.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2008. "Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel's Philosophical Project." In The
Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by
Frederick Beiser, 281-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen. 1990. Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen. 1991. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right, vii-
xxxii, edited by Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckert, Rachel. 2017. "Organism and System in German Idealism." In The Cambridge
Companion to German Philosophy (2nd Edition), edited by Karl Ameriks, 271-291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
