HEGEL’S PROTO-MODERNIST CONCEPTION OF PHILOSOPHY AS SCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v11i4.52207Keywords:
Scientific Philosophy, Hegel, Marxist Philosophy, History of Philosophy of ScienceAbstract
I argue that the reception of Hegel in the sub-field of history and philosophy of science has been in part impeded by a misunderstanding of his mature metaphilosophical views. Taking Alan Richardson’s influential account of the rise of scientific philosophy as an illustration of such misunderstanding, I argue that the mature Hegel’s metaphilosophical views place him much closer to the philosophers who are commonly taken as paradigms of scientific philosophy than is commonly thought. Hegel is commonly presented as someone who conceived of philosophy as a science that relied on the solitary genius of the individual thinker, and as a science whose propositions could not and should not be made accessible to “the common people”. Against this view, I argue that Hegel in fact thought that philosophy was a thoroughly anti-individualistic activity, and that he emphasized the importance of the intersubjective accessibility of philosophical discourse. I argue that when we carefully reconstruct Hegel’s reasons for his break with Schelling, and if we pay close attention to his explicit metaphilosophical pronouncements, we can see that he in fact adhered to what I call a “proto-modernist” conception of philosophy as a science. I conclude by pointing out how the mischaracterization of Hegel has served to obscure the existence of a strand of scientific philosophy that emerged by way of an immanent critique of Hegel, namely Marxist philosophy.
Downloads
References
Al-‘Alim, Mahmud Amin. 1971. Falsafat al-Mosadafa [Philosophy of Chance]. Cairo, Egypt:
Dar Al-Ma‘arf.
Agassi, Joseph. 2008. Science and its History: A Reassessment of the Historiography. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Bakhurst, David. 2018. “On Lenin’s Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Studies in East
European Thought 70: 107-119.
Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Hegel. New York and London: Routledge.
Bird, Alexander. 2008. Thomas Kuhn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bird, Alexander. 2015. "Kuhn and the Historiography of Science." In Kuhn's Structures of
Scientific Revolutions 50 Years On, edited by William J. Devlin and Alisa Bokulich, 23-38. New York: Springer
Burbidge, John. 2006. “New Directions in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature.” In Hegel: New
Directions, edited by Katerina Deligiorgi, 177-192. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1993. “Hegel on the Interaction between Science and Philosophy.” In Hegel
and Newtonianism, edited by Michael J. Petry, 61-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bunge, Mario. 2012. Evaluating Philosophies. Dordrecht: Springer.
Colletti, Lucio.1979. Marxism and Hegel. Translated by Lawrence Garner. London: Verso.
Coniglione, Francesco. 2007. “The Place of Polish Scientific Philosophy in the European
Context.” Polish Journal of Philosophy 1.1:7-27.
Daston, Lorrain. 1992. “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective.” Social Studies of Science
: 597-618.
von Engelhardt, Dietrich. 1993. “Hegel on Chemistry and the Organic Sciences.” In Hegel and
Newtonianism, edited by Michael J. Petry, 657-665. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Engels, Frederick. 1941. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical German Philosophy. New York: International Publishers.
Ferrini, Cinzia. 2009. "Reason Observing Nature." In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by Kenneth Westphal, 92-135. Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing.
Heidelberger, Michael. 2006. “Kantianism and Realism: Alois Riehl (Moritz Schlick).” In The
Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Michael Friedman and Alfred Nordmann, 227-247. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1969. Science of Logic. Translated by A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands, NJ:
Humanities Press International, Inc.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1970. Philosophy of Nature, Volume 1. Edited and translated by Michael John
Petry. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971a.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie I, Werke 18.Werke in zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971b.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie II, Werke 19. Werke in
zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1971c.Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie III, Werke 20. Werke in
zwanzigBänden. Edited by Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction. Translated by
H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1976. Logic: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part I.
Translated by William Wallace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1984. Hegel: The Letters. Edited and translated by Clark Butler and Christiane
Seiler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hegel, G. W.F. 1995a. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 1: Greek Philosophy to Plato. Translated by E. S. Haldane. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. 1995b. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 2: Plato and the
Platonists. Translated by E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. Lincoln and London:
University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1995c. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 3: Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Translated by E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hegel, G. W. F., and F. W. J. Schelling 2000. "The Critical Journal of Philosophy, Introduction: On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism Generally, and its Relationship to the Present State of Philosophy in Particular." In Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, edited and translated by George di Giovanni and H.S. Harris.
Houlgate, Stephen. 1990. "World History as the Progress of Consciousness: An Interpretation of
Hegel's Philosophy of History." The Owl of Minerva 22.1: 69-80.
Howard, Don. 2003. “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North
American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury.” In Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by Gary Hardcastle and Alan Richardson, 25-93. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1965. "Philosophy as Rigorous Science." In Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, translated by Quentin Lauer, 71-147. New York: Harper & Row.
Kaufman, Walter. 1972. "The Hegel Myth and its Method." In Hegel: A Collection of Critical
Essays, edited by Alasdair MacIntyre, 21-60. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday & Company.
Kircz, Joost. 1998. “Engels and the Natural Sciences: A Starting Point.” Science & Society 62.1:
-78.
Klein, Alexander. 2015. “Science, Religion, and ‘The Will to Believe’.” HOPOS: The Journal of
the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science5.1: 72-117.
Lawler, James, and Vladimir Shtinov. 1988. "Hegel's Method of Doing Philosophy Historically:
A Reply." Doing Philosophy Historically, edited by Peter H. Hare, 267-280. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Lukács, Georg. 1975. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin Press.
Lunacharsky, A. V. 1967. Revolutionary Silhouettes. Translated and edited by Michael Glenny with an introduction by Isaac Deutscher. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
Mueller, Gustav E. 1958. "The Hegel Legend of 'Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis'." Journal of the
History of Ideas 19.3: 411-414.
Murray, Patrick. 1988. Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge. Atlantic Highlands, NJ
Humanities Press..
Neuber, Matthias. 2014. “Critical Realism in Perspective: Remarks on a Neglected Current in
Neo-Kantian Epistemology.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, edited by M.C. Galavotti et al., 657-673. Dordrecht: Springer.
Neurath, Otto. 1962. “Unified Science as Encyclopedic Integration.” In International
Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. I, 1-27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neurath, Otto, Rudolf Carnap, and Hans Hahn. 1973. "WissenschaftlicheWeltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis." In Otto Neurath: Empiricism and Sociology, edited by Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, 299-318. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Oizerman, T. I., and A. S. Bogomolov. 1986. Principles of the Theory of the Historical Process
in Philosophy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Omodeo, Pietro D. 2016 “After Nikolai Bukharin: History of Science and Cultural Hegemony at
the Threshold of the Cold War.” History of the Human Sciences 29.4-5:13-34.
Pinkard, Terry. 2005. “Speculative Naturphilosophie and the Development of the Empirical
Sciences: Hegel’s Perspective.” In Continental Philosophy of Science, edited by Gary Gutting, 19-34. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Plekhanov, Georgi. 1947. The Development of the Monist View of History. London: Lawrence &
Wishart.
Posch, Thomas. 2011. “Hegel and the Sciences.” In A Companion to Hegel, edited by Stephen
Houlgate and Michael Baur, 177-202. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Reisch, George A. 1991. “Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism?” Philosophy of Science 58.2:264-
Reisch, George A. 1997. “How Postmodern was Neurath’s Idea of Unity of Science?” Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28.3:439-451.
Reisch, George A. 2003. “Disunity in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.” In
Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by Gary Hardcastle and Alan Richardson, 197-215. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy
Slopes of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reisch, George A. 2009. “Three Kinds of Political Engagements in Philosophy of Science.”
Science & Education 18.2:191-197.
Reisch, George A. 2012. “The Paranoid Style in American History of Science.” Theoria: An
International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 27.3:323-342.
Reisch. George A. 2014. “When Structure Met Sputnik: On the Cold War Origins of The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Science and Technology in the Global Cold War,
edited by Naomi Oreskes and John Krige, 371-392. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Reisch, George A. 2016a. “Telegrams and Paradigms: On Cold War Geopolitics and The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Science Studies During the Cold War and
Beyond: Paradigms Defected, edited by Elena Aronova and Simone Turchetti, 25-53.
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reisch, George A. 2016b. “Aristotle in the Cold War: On the Origins of Thomas Kuhn’s The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” In Kuhn’s ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ at
Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, edited by Robert J. Richards, and Lorrain Daston,
-29. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Reisch, George A. 2017. “Pragmatic Engagements: Philipp Frank and James Bryant Conant on
Science, Education, and Democracy.” Studies in Eastf European Thought 69:227-244.
Richardson, Alan. 1997. "Towards a History of Scientific Philosophy." Perspectives on Science 5.3: 418-451.272-291.
Richardson, Alan. 2002. “Philosophy as Science: The Modernist Agenda of Philosophy of
Science, 1900-1950.” In The Scope of Logic: Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, edited by Peter Gärdenfors, Jan Wolenski, and K. Kijania-Placek, 621-639. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Richardson, Alan. 2008. “Scientific Philosophy as a Topic for History of Science.” ISIS 99.1: 88-
Richardson, Alan. 2010. "Ernst Cassirer and Michael Friedman: Kantian or Hegelian Dynamics
of Reason?" In Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science, edited by Mary Domski and Michael Dickson, 279-294. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Richardson, Alan. 2012. “Occasions for an Empirical History of Philosophy of Science:
American Philosophers of Science at Work in the 1950s and 1960s.” HOPOS:The
Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2: 1-20.
Saito, Kohei. 2017. Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of
Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Sheehan, Helena. 2017. Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History (2nd Ed,).
London: Verso.
Smart, H.R. 1962. Philosophy and its History: A Critical Examination of the Permanent Value to
Philosophy of its own History. La Salle, Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Stanley, John L. 1997. “Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature.” Science & Society
4: 449-473.
Stump, David J. 2009. “Pragmatism, Activism, and the Icy Slopes of Logic in George Reisch’s
Portrait of the Philosophy of Science as a Young Field.” Science & Education 18.2:169-
Inc.
Uebel, Thomas. 2009. “Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical
Empiricism.” Science & Education 18.2:161-168.
Valentinov, Nikolay. 1968. Encounters with Lenin. Translated by P. Rosta and B. Pearce: New
York: Oxford University Press.
Viola, Enrico. 2013. “The Specificity of Logical Empiricism in the Twentieth-Century History of
Scientific Philosophy.” HOPOS:The Journal of the International Society for the History
of Philosophy of Science 3: 191-209.
Wandschneider, Dieter. 2013. “Philosophy of Nature.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel,
edited by Allegra de Laurentiis and Jeffrey Edwards,103-126. London: Bloomsbury.
Westphal, Kenneth. 2008. "Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel's Philosophical Project." In The
Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, edited by
Frederick Beiser, 281-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen. 1990. Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen. 1991. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right, vii-
xxxii, edited by Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckert, Rachel. 2017. "Organism and System in German Idealism." In The Cambridge
Companion to German Philosophy (2nd Edition), edited by Karl Ameriks, 271-291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
