Métaphysique et éthique clandestines : le cas Delaube
Abstract
Taking by object the work Reflexions morales et les religions métaphysiques sur les et de l'homme connaissances, early eighteenth century manuscript attributed to Delaube, this article aims to show the pluralism of clandestine speech in the Réflexions defending a spiritualist monism quite original, which largely keeps away from metaphysical concerns of the libertine currents inherent to most clandestine manuscripts. However, despite its spiritualist metaphysics option, the manuscript of Delaube does not leave the issues discussed at that time, like the delicate conciliation of the universal determinism and human freedom, and the essential questions of the clandestine authors, as the denunciation of religious imposture in political vocation. Despite these thematic approaches, Réflexions does not preserve an unsuspected interest, proposing a most original new ethics, which was only proposed by Theophrastus redivivus can be equalized within the clandestine current.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Papers
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).