RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF PHENOMENOLOGY IN NON-PHILOSOPHICAL CONTEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v14i3.64930Keywords:
Applied phenomenology, Microphenomenology, Phenomenological interviewAbstract
The aim of this paper is to present two recent developments of the phenomenological methodology for description and analysis of lived experience: the microphenomenological interview and the phenomenological interview. It is held that these two proposals, already applied to the description and analysis of subjective experiences in different experiential domains, may have an important contribution for the studies of the lived experience in the health dimension. Based on a literature review, it is possible to state that microphenomenology and the phenomenological interview differ from the established methodologies of phenomenological qualitative research, insofar as they result from the recent movement towards naturalization of phenomenology and from the attitude of mutual clarification in relation to the Cognitive Sciences. This characteristic implies that the use of these methodological tools in Health Sciences contains an important potential for understanding the complex meanings of the experience lived in the first person.
Downloads
References
BURCH, M. Make applied phenomenology what it needs to be: an interdisciplinary research program. Continental Philosophy Review, v. 54, n. 2, p. 275-293, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-021-09532-1.
FINLAY, L. Debating phenomenological research methods. Phenomenology & Practice, v. 3, n. 1, p. 6-25, 2009. DOI: 10.29173/pandpr19818.
FROESE, T. et al. The pandemic experience: a corpus of subjective reports on life during the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK, Japan, and Mexico. Frontiers in Public Health, v. 9, 725506, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.725506.
GALLAGHER, S. Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 4, n. 3, p. 195-214, 1997.
GALLAGHER, S. Rethinking nature: phenomenology and a non-reductionist cognitive science. Australasian Philosophical Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 125-137, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/24740500.2018.1552074.
GIORGI, A. Review essay: a response to the attempted critique of the scientific phenomenological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 83-144, 2017. DOI: 10.1163/15691624-12341319.
HØFFDING, S. A phenomenology of musical absorption. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
HØFFDING, S.; MARTINY, K. Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 15, n. 4, p. 539-564, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-015-9433-z.
HØFFDING, S.; MARTINY, K.; ROEPSTORFF, A. Can we trust the phenomenological interview? Metaphysical, epistemological, and methodological objections. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, v. 21, n. 1, p. 33-51, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-021-09744-z.
KLINKE, M. et al. Getting the left right. Qualitative Health Research, v. 25, n. 12, p. 1623-1636, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314566328.
KLINKE, M.; FERNANDEZ, A. Taking phenomenology beyond the first-person perspective: conceptual grounding in the collection and analysis of observational evidence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-021-09796-1.
KOCKELMANS, J. Phenomenological psychology: the Dutch school. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing, 1987.
KØSTER, A.; FERNANDEZ, A. Investigating modes of being in the world: an introduction to Phenomenologically grounded qualitative research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-020-09723-w.
MANEN, M. Phenomenology of practice. London: Routledge, 2014.
MANEN, M. Phenomenology it its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, v. 27, p. 810-825, 2017a. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317699381.
MANEN, M. But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, v. 27, p. 775-779, 2017b. DOI: 10.1177/1049732317699570.
MANEN, M. Phenomenology and meaning attribution. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-12, 2017c. DOI: 10.1080/20797222.2017.1368253.
MANEN, M. Rebuttal rejoinder: present IPA for what it is – Interpretative psychological analysis. Qualitative Health Research, v. 28, p. 1959-1968, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318795474.
MANEN, M. Rebuttal: doing phenomenology on the things. Qualitative Health Research, v. 29, p. 908-925, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1049732319827293.
MARTINY, K. Embodying investigations of cerebral palsy: a case of open cognitive science. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, 2015.
MARTINY, K.; TORO, J.; HØFFDING, S. Framing a phenomenological mixed method: from inspiration to guidance. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 12, 602081, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.60208.
PALEY, J. Husserl, phenomenology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 26, p. 187-193, 1997. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026187.x.
PALEY, J. Misinterpretive phenomenology: Heidegger, ontology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, v. 27, p. 817-824, 1998. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00607.x.
PALEY, J. Phenomenology as rhetoric. Nursing Inquiry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 106-116, 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00263.x.
PALEY, J. Phenomenology as qualitative research: a critical analysis of meaning attribution. London: Routledge, 2016.
PETITMENGIN, C. Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: an interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, v. 5, p. 229-269, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-006-9022-2.
PETITMENGIN, C. et al. What is it like to meditate? Methods and issues for a micro-phenomenological description of meditative experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 24, n. 5-6, p. 170-198, 2017.
PETITMENGIN, C.; NAVARRO, V.; QUYEN, M. Anticipating seizure: pre-reflective experience at the center of neuro-phenomenology. Consciousness and Cognition, v. 16, p. 746-764, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.05.006.
PETITMENGIN, C.; REMILLIEUX, A.; VALENZUELA-MOGUILLANSKY, C. Discovering the structures of lived experience: towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, v. 18, n. 4, p. 691-730, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-018-9597-4.
SMITH, J. A. “Yes, it is phenomenological”: a reply to Max van Manen's critique of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Health Research, v. 28, n. 12, p. 1955-1958, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318799577.
VALENZUELA-MOGUILLANSKY, C. An exploration of the bodily experience of persons suffering from fibromyalgia. Constructivist Foundations, v. 8, n. 3, p. 339-350, 2013.
WITHERINGTON, D. et al. Metatheory and the primacy of conceptual analysis in developmental science. Human Development, v. 61, p. 181-198, 2018. DOI: 10.1159/000490160.
ZAHAVI, D. Naturalized phenomenology. In: GALLAGHER, S.; SCHMICKING, D. Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. p. 3-19.
ZAHAVI, D. Phenomenology. The basics. London: Routledge, 2016.
ZAHAVI, D. Getting it quite wrong: van Manen and Smith on phenomenology. Qualitative Health Research, v. 29, n. 6, p. 900-907, 2019a. DOI: 10.1177/1049732318817547.
ZAHAVI, D.; MARTINY, K. Phenomenology in nursing studies: new perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Studies, v. 93, p. 155-162, 2019b. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.014.
ZAHAVI, D. The practice of phenomenology: the case of Max van Manen. Nursing Philosophy, v. 21, n. 2, e12276, 2020. DOI: 10.1111/nup.12276.
ZAHAVI, D. Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché. Continental Philosophy Review, v. 54, p. 259-273, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-019-09463-y.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Róbson Ramos dos Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
-
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
