THE PUBLIC LIBRARY AND EXCELLENCE IN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES: the technique of benchmarking
Abstract
Deals with the technique of benchmarking for the continuous improvement of products and services offered by the public library. Defined as a process of systematic comparison of products and services with those offered by the competitor or with companies considered as excellent in a determined field, benchmarking can assist public libraries, based on the methodology proposed which is divided into six stages: 1st comparison; 2nd evaluation; 3rd identification of opportunities; 4th selection of the best opportunities; 5th incorporation of the best opportunities; and 6th promotion of changes in the organisation, in the search for excellence in the satisfaction of the needs of users/community. Concludes that rather than generating resistance by reason of organisational culture, the employment of modern techniques of quality management, as is the case of benchmarking, can be determinant for the continuing improvement of products and services in organisations which consider the satisfaction of needs as one of their chief critical factors of success.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows sharing of the work with mandatory acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided there is acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) only after the official publication of the article by the journal, thereby preserving the confidentiality of the double-blind peer review. This subsequent sharing has the potential to increase the impact and citation of the published work.


