User of information and structural rabble as non-public: reflections on inequality and social invisibility in information units
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2020v30n4.57350Abstract
The text seeks to reflect on inequality and social invisibility in the context of information units, considering, as an inflection point, the concept of information user. To this end, it performs a literature review, addressing concepts related to social classes, within the scope of social theory, and to information users, in the areas of library science and information science. It was observed that the concept of information user refers to a type of subject studied: a) out of context in information systems (physical and cognitive models); b) contextually, being able to dispense with the notion of system (social model); and c) from some individual / social privilege (economic, cultural and social capital). The concept of structural rabble brings a counterpoint to that of the user of information regarding inequality in social classes. The non-public concept, when conceived as a structural rabble, reinforces the contrast to the concept of information user. Finally, it was observed that the theoretical choices are also political, with ethical implications. They can be conformed to the public, real or potential, or non-conformed to the structural rabble as non-public. In this context, it was argued that the information professional should work with the community, being open to speaking the language of the non-public and considering their culture. The studies of “information and community” or “users and non-users” allow considering different social classes, in the sense of giving social visibility to the structural rabble when it starts to be conceived as a public.
Keywords: Information user. Structural rabble. Non-public. Social invisibility. Information units.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows sharing of the work with mandatory acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided there is acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) only after the official publication of the article by the journal, thereby preserving the confidentiality of the double-blind peer review. This subsequent sharing has the potential to increase the impact and citation of the published work.


