Nicholas Rubakin through the lenses of a critical theory of information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2023v33.67734Keywords:
Bibliopsychology; Nicolas Roubakine (Rubakin); Critical theory; Critical information theory; ReadingAbstract
In the scope of epistemological-historical and sociocritical studies in Library & Information Science, the paper discusses the possible intersections between Russian librarian Nicholas Rubakin’s thought and the critical theory developed by members of the Institute for Social Research, internationally known as the Frankfurt School. This paper aims to investigate whether and under which conditions the bibliopsychological theory developed by the Russian theorist in the 1880s and 1920s, centered for and by reading as an instrument of social change, presents convergences with Frankfurt’s critical theory, developed in the 1930s, which serves as a theoretical and methodological basis for the critical theory of information. This study is exploratory, theoretical and based on a qualitative approach. Besides, it adopts a bibliographical and historical research criteria within the scope of the epistemology of Library & Information Science and the perspective of critical theory in the field. The theoretical concepts employed in this research are founded, on the one hand, on Nicholas Rubakin’s approach to reading and, on the other hand, on the critical theory, according to the philosophers of Frankfurt School Max Horkheimer and Herbert Marcuse; these contributions are complemented by the works of Arthur Bezerra and Gustavo Saldanha on critical theory of information. The results indicate three categories of analysis that suggest that there is an association between critical theory and bibliopsychology: theoretical foundation; methodological structure; and transformative praxis. The findings reported here shed new light on the sociocritical dimension in Nicholas Rubakin’s thought through the lenses of Library & Information Science and its contribution to social change.
Downloads
References
BEZERRA, Arthur Coelho. Teoria crítica da informação: proposta teórico-metodológica de integração entre os conceitos de regime de informação e competência crítica em informação. In: BEZERRA, Arthur Coelho et al. iKritika: estudos críticos em informação. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2019. p. 15-72.
BEZERRA, Arthur Coelho; SCHNEIDER, Marco; SALDANHA, Gustavo Silva. Competência crítica em informação como crítica à competência em informação. Informação & Sociedade: estudos, João Pessoa, v. 29, n. 3, p. 5-22, 2019. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/ies/article/view/47337. Acesso em: 30 ago. 2022.
FERRIÈRE, Adolphe. La psychologie bibliologique, d'après les documents et les travaux de Nicolas Roubakine. Archives de Psychologie, Genève, t. XVI, n. 61, p. 101-132, 1917.
HORKHEIMER, Max. Teoria tradicional e teoria crítica. In: BENJAMIN, Walter et al. Textos escolhidos. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1980. (Coleção Os Pensadores).
MARCUSE, Herbert. O homem unidimensional: estudos da ideologia da sociedade industrial. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1973.
MARX, Karl. O 18 Brumário de Luis Bonaparte. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2011.
MARX, Karl. Teses sobre Feuerbach. In: MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friederich. A ideologia alemã: crítica da mais recente filosofia alemã em seus representantes Feuerbach, B. Bauer e Stirner, e do socialismo alemão em seus diferentes profetas. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2007. p. 533-535.
MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friederich. Manifesto Comunista. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
NOBRE, Marcos. A teoria crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2004.
OTLET, Paul. A psicologia e as atividades da mente ou psicologia bibliológica. In: OTLET, Paul. Tratado de documentação. Brasília, DF: Briquet de Lemos, 2018. p. 45-48. Disponível em: https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/32627. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2022.
ROUBAKINE, Nicolas. Introduction à la psychologie bibliologique. Paris: Association Internationale de Bibliologie, 1998. v. 1.
RUBAKIN, Aleksandr Nikolaevich. Rubakin: lotsman knijnogo moria [Rubakin: piloto do mar dos livros]. [Moskva]: Molodaia Gvardiia, 1979.
SALDANHA, Gustavo Silva. A invenção da Ciência da Informação segundo Nicolas Roubakine (Rubakin). Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 1, 2019b. Disponível em: https://revistas.ancixbz.org/index.php/tpbci/article/view/477. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2022.
SALDANHA, Gustavo Silva. Sem e cem teorias críticas em Ciência da Informação: autorretrato da teoria social e o método da crítica nos estudos informacionais, uma bibliografia benjaminiana aberta. In: BEZERRA, Arthur Coelho et al. iKritika: estudos críticos em informação. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2019. p. 171-240.
SAVOVA, Elena. Avant-propos. In: ROUBAKINE, Nicolas. Introduction à la psychologie bibliologique. Paris: Association Internationale de Bibliologie, 1998. v. 1. p. 7-18.
SAVOVA, Elena; ESTIVALS, Robert. Roubakine: fondateur de la bibliologie scientifique. In: ESTIVALS, Robert. Petite anthologie francophone de la bibliologie. Paris: Société de Bibliologie et de Schématisation, 1993. p. 71-80.
SENN, Alfred Erich. Nicholas Rubakin: a life for books. Newtonville, Mass.: Oriental Research Partners, 1977. (Russian Biography Series, 1).
SIMSOVA, Sylva. Nicholas Rubakin and bibliopsychology. Libri, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 118-129, 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.1966.16.2.118. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/LIBR.1966.16.2.118/html. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows sharing of the work with mandatory acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided there is acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) only after the official publication of the article by the journal, thereby preserving the confidentiality of the double-blind peer review. This subsequent sharing has the potential to increase the impact and citation of the published work.


