HORKHEIMER AND THE TEMPTATIONS OF CRITICAL THEORY

Authors

  • Christoph Türcke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v10i4.49719

Keywords:

Revolution, Administered world, Bourgeois society, Critical theory

Abstract

This article is aims to expose some central elements of the conception of critical theory developed by Max Horkheimer. This conception oscillates in a tense field ranging from the possibility of revolution to the suspicion that both, the socialist and postwar capitalist blocs are made up of elements that tend to annul the individual through the constitution of a fully managed society, whose ideal prototype was fascism. The radicality of Horkheimer’s critical thinking captures an unavoidable dilemma for critical thinking: both the recipes of revolution and the overvaluation of the forces of the individual and subjectivity confirm the established status quo. Facing this radical diagnosis of our reality presents itself as a central challenge of critical theory. How can we make critical theory in this field of constant tensions, give voice to what systems shut up, without falling into the temptation to give way and yet without falling into immobility? [Editor’s translation].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

HORKHEIMER, M. Autoritärer Staat. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987.

______. Dämmerung. Notizen in Deutschland. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987a.

______. Die Juden und Europa. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987b .

______. Gedanke zur Religion. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 3. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1988.

______. Notizen 1949-69. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden. Bd. 6. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1991.

______. Programm einer intereuropäischen Akademie. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 12. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1985.

______. Kritische Theorie gestern und heute. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 8. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1985a.

______. Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 6. Fischer: Frankfurt am Main, 1991a.

______. Vernunft und Selbsterhaltung. In: ______. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987c.

HORKHEIMER, M.; ADORNO, T. W. Dialektik der Aufklärung. In: HORKHEIMER, M. Gesammelte Schriften in neunzehn Bänden, Bd. 5. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1987. [Edição brasileira: Dialética do esclarecimento: fragmentos filosóficos. Trad. Guido de Almeida. Zahar: Rio de Janeiro, 2006].

NIETZSCHE, F. Also sprach Zarathustra. In: ______. Das Hauptwerk, Bd. III. München: Nymphenburger Verlag, 1990. [Edição brasileira: Assim falava Zaratustra. Trad. José Mendes de Souza. Fonte digital: http://www.ebooksbrasil.org/adobeebook/zara.pdf, 2002].

______. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Vorrede. In: ______. Werke in sechs Bänden, Bd. IV. Hrsg. Karl Schlechta. München; Wien: Carl Hanser, 1980. S. 565-566. [Edição brasileira: Além do bem e do mal ou prelúdio de uma filosofia do futuro. Trad. Márcio Pugliesi. Curitiba: Hemus, 2001].

WIGGERSHAUS, R. Die Frankfurter Schule. Rowohlt: München, 1986. [Edição brasileira: A Escola de Frankfurt: história, desenvolvimento teórico, significação política. Trad. Lilyiane Deroche-Gurcel. Rio de Janeiro: Difel, 2002].

Published

2019-12-16