THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMY, TECHNOLOGY AND NATURE IN THE CAPITALIST AND MARXIST UTOPIA ACCORDING TO HANS JONAS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7443/problemata.v15i3.72633

Keywords:

capitalism, Marxism, technology, Jonas

Abstract

This paper explores the historical, philosophical, and ecological dimensions of economic thought, tracing its evolution from ancient oikonomia to the hybrid discipline straddling humanities and mathematical sciences. It critiques the shared emphasis of both capitalist and Marxist systems on technological and industrial progress, which often leads to cyclical crises, ecological degradation, and exploitation. Drawing on Hans Jonas' The Imperative of Responsibility, the discussion highlights the urgent need for a paradigm shift, where economic practices prioritize environmental sustainability and collective well-being over short-term gains. Jonas' call for ethically and intellectually farsighted leadership forms a central theme, advocating for an "aristocracy of responsibility" to navigate the epochal challenges of modernity. Interdisciplinary research is proposed as essential for developing alternative models that reconcile economic activity with ecological imperatives. By integrating Jonas’ emphasis on responsibility and foresight, the paper calls for a reimagining of progress that ensures collective well-being and sustainability for future generations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Angela Michelis, Università di Torino

Adjunct Professor, University of Turin

References

BÖHLER, D. (ed.). Ethik für die Zukunft: Im Diskurs mit Hans Jonas. München: CH. Beck, 1994.

BUENOS AIRES DE CARVALHO, H.; OLIVEIRA, J. (eds.). Ética, técnica e responsabilidade. Curitiba: Editora CRV, 2015.

DEL NOCE, A. Il suicidio della rivoluzione. Pósfacio de G. Riconda (ed.). Torino: Aragno, 2004.

DONNELLY, S. The Philosophy of Nature and the Ethics of Responsibility. Social Research, New York, v. 56, n. 3, p. 635-657, 1989.

FRANCIS, Holy Father. Laudato si’: Encyclical Letter on Care for Our Common Home. 2015. Disponível em: https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2024.

GALBRAITH, John Kenneth. Economics in Perspective: A Critical History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.

HÖSLE, V. Philosophie der ökologischen Krise. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1991.

JONAS, H. Contemporary Problems in Ethics from a Jewish Perspective. In: ID. Philosophical Essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1974, p. 168-182.

JONAS, H. Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt a/M: Insel Verlag, 1979; JONAS, H. The Imperative of Responsibility. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1984.

KANDEL, R. L’incertitude des climats. Paris: Hachette Littératures, 1998.

LATOUCHE, S. La construction imaginaire de l'économique. Revue Vie et Sciences Économiques, 1994.

MANCINI, R. (ed.). Etiche della mondialità: La nascita di una coscienza planetaria. Assisi: Cittadella, 1996.

MANCINI, R. Senso e futuro della politica: Dalla globalizzazione a un mondo comune. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2002.

MICHELIS, A. Una via ecologica per la ricostruzione di uno spazio pubblico condiviso e il possibile ruolo della filosofia. Filosofia e Teologia, n. 1, 2009, p. 81-94.

ǾFSTI, A. (ed.). Ecology and Ethics: A Report from Melbu Conference, 18-23 July 1990. Trondheim: Norland Akademi for Kunst og Vitenskap, 1992.

SACHS, W. Planets Dialectics: Explorations in Environment and Development. London: Zed Books Ltd, 2015.

SEVERINO, E. Essenza del nichilismo, marxismo e capitalismo. In: Il declino del capitalismo. Milano: Rizzoli, 1993.

SCRUTON, R. Green Philosophy: How to Think Seriously about the Planet. London: Atlantic Books, 2013.

VAZ-CURADO R. M. COSTA, D.; EFKEN, K.-H. (eds.). Normas, Máximas, Ação. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2015.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

Issue

Section

Papers