Sobre los problemas de posesión y atribución para el saber cómo colectivo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v11iEspecial.69933Keywords:
Saber como, Saber como grupal, Atribuciones de saber como, Estados colectivos, Intencionalidad no-proposicionalAbstract
En este ensayo, examino dos problemas que cualquier teoría del saber cómo y en particular una teoría del saber como grupal debe tratar: el problema de la posesión, que es la necesidad de explicar como un grupo puede estar en un estado de saber como hacer algo, y el problema de la atribución, que es la necesidad de dar cuenta de las condiciones en las que es admisible atribuir saber como a un grupo. Argumento que (a pesar de ciertas apariencias iniciales) estos problemas son independientes, lo que es especialmente importante en el contexto de teorías del saber cómo donde este no puede en general reducirse a actitudes proposicionales.
Downloads
References
BENGSON, J.; MOFFETT, M. Nonpropositional intellectualism. In: BENGSON, J.; MOFFETT, M. (Eds.) Knowing how.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 161-195.
BIRCH, J. Joint know-how. Philosophical Studies, v. 176, p. 3329-3352, 2019.
BIRD, A. Social knowing: the social sense of 'scientific knowledge'. Philosophical Perspectives, v. 24, p. 23-56, 2010.
CATH, Y. Knowing how without knowing that. In: BENGSON, J.; MOFFETT, M. (Eds.) Knowing how. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 113-135.
DENNETT, D. The unimagined preposterousness of zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 2, p. 322-326, 1995.
DI PAOLO, E.; CUFFARI, E.; DE JAEGHER, H. Linguistic bodies: the continuity between life and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2018.
FARKAS, K. Know-how and non-propositional intentionality. In: GRZANKOWSKI A.; MONTAGUE, M. (Eds.) Non-propositional intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 95-113.
GRZANKOWSKI, A. Attitudes towards objects. Noûs, v. 48, p. 314-328, 2014.
GRZANKOWSKI, A. Non-propositional contents and how to find them. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 25, p. 233-241, 2018.
HABGOOD-COOTE, J. Knowledge-how, abilities, and questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, v. 97, p. 86-104, 2019.
HABGOOD-COOTE, J. Collective practical knowledge is a fragmented interrogative capacity. Philosophical Issues, v. 32, p. 180-199, 2022.
HAUGELAND, J. Two dogmas of rationalism. In: ADAMS, Z.; BROWNING, J. (Eds.) Giving a damn: essays in dialogue with John Haugeland. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2017. p. 293-310.
HAWLEY, K. Success and knowledge-how. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 40, p. 19-31, 2003.
JENKINS, A.; DODELL-FEDER, D.; SAXE, R.; KNOBE, J. The neural bases of directed and spontaneous mental state attributions to group agents. PLoS ONE, v. 9, e105341, p. 01-11, 2014.
MASTO, M. Knowledge-the and knowledge-wh. American Philosophical Quarterly, v. 53, p. 295-306, 2016.
MENDELOVICI, A. Propositionalism without propositions, Objectualism without objects. In: GRZANKOWSKI A.; MONTAGUE, M. (Eds.) Non-propositional intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 214-233.
MÖLDER, B. Mind ascribed: an elaboration and defence of interpretivism. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2010.
MORALES CARBONELL, F. Individual and collective know-how are understanding-like. Unpublished manuscript.
MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, E. The shared know-how in Linguistic Bodies. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, v. 22, p. 94-101, 2021.
PALERMOS, S. O.; TOLLEFSEN, D. P. Group know-how. In: CARTER J. A.; CLARK, A.; KALLESTRUP, J.; PALERMOS, S. O.; PRITCHARD, D. (Eds.) Socially extended epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 112-131.
RYLE, G. The concept of mind (60th anniversary Edition). London: Routledge, 2009.
SAINSBURY, M. Attitudes on display. In: GRZANKOWSKI A.; MONTAGUE, M. (Eds.) Non-propositional intentionality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 234-258.
STANLEY, J.; WILLIAMSON, T. Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy, v. 98, p. 411–444, 2001.
TOLLEFSEN, D. Groups as agents. New York: Polity, 2015.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical investigations (4th edition). London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal general policy
1.This journal works under a Creative Commons License aplied to online journals. That icence can be read in the following link: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2.Accordingly to this License, a)the journal declares that authors hold the copyright of their articles without restrictions, and they can archieve them as post-print elsewhere. b)the journal allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
Metadata Policy for information describing items in the repository
1. Anyone may access the metadata free of charge at anytime.
2.The metadata may be re-used in any medium without prior permission, even commercial purposes provided the OAI Identifier or a link to the original metadata record are given, under the terms of a CC BY license refered for the Journal.