Por que não tão sério? Dispositivos pragmáticos em piadas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v11iEspecial.70040

Keywords:

Humor; Teoria da incongruência; Implicaturas conversacionais; Atos de fala; Pressuposições., Humor, Teoria da incongruência, Implicaturas conversacionais, Atos de fala, Pressuposições

Abstract

A pergunta fundamental na filosofia do humor é: o que nos faz rir? Neste artigo, defenderemos a chamada teoria da incongruência, segundo a qual o riso é provocado pela apresentação de aspectos inconsistentes em um proferimento. Para isso, analisaremos como a pragmática da linguagem fornece maneiras de apresentar incongruências em piadas escritas e faladas e, consequentemente, de provocar a diversão cômica em uma audiência. Nosso foco será em implicaturas conversacionais, atos de fala e pressuposições, e como eles são usados em piadas. Esta não é uma análise exaustiva de todas as formas como incongruências são geradas em proferimentos cômicos; claro, há outros modos de apresentar desarmonias, tais como por meio aspectos semânticos. Por fim, discutiremos se piadas deveriam ser consideradas um tipo distinto de ato de fala, ao invés de só um uso parasitário da linguagem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Deiver Vinícius de Melo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

Deiver Vinícius de Melo is a PhD Student in Philosophy at the State University of Campinas – Unicamp with a Capes/ProEx scholarship (Proc. 88887.947697/2024-00). He completed his undergraduate studies in Philosophy at Federal University of São João del-Rei – UFSJ, and his M.A. in Philosophy at the State University of Campinas. His main interests are in philosophy of language, logic and philosophy of humor, and the relation between these areas.

Pedro Daher Novo, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)

B.A. and is currently a M.A. Student in Philosophy at the State University of Campinas – Unicamp with a Capes scholarship (Proc. 88887.947614/2024-00). As an undergrad, he conducted research on the structure of speech acts in mathematics financed by the The State of São Paulo Research Foundation – Fapesp. His main interests are in philosophy of language, speech acts theory, ontology of human sciences, logic and philosophy of mathematics.

References

ATTARDO, S. The violation of Grice’s maxims in jokes. In: COSTA, D. (Ed.) Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1990. p. 355-362.

ATTARDO, S. Humor and pragmatics. In: ATTARDO, S. (Ed.) The Routledge handbook of language and humor. New York: Routledge, 2017. p. 174-188.

AUSTIN, J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

BLANCO SALGUEIRO, A. Cómo hacer bromas con palabras. Teorema, v. 43, p. 47-61, 2024.

BLANCO SALGUEIRO, A. Bromear como acto de habla y la relatividad lingüística del humor. Análisis Filosófico, v. 43, p. 69-92, 2023.

CAMP, E. Just saying, just kidding: liability for accountability-avoiding speech in ordinary conversation, politics and law. In: HORN, L. H. (Ed.) From lying to perjury: linguistic and legal perspective on lies and other falsehoods. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2022. p. 227-258.

CARROLL, N. Humour: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

DUNBAR, G. Phonetic and functional aspects of speech laughter: towards an expressive cognitive phonology. CogniTextes, v. 11, s/p, 2014.

GRICE, H. P. Meaning. The Philosophical Review, v. 66, p. 377-388, 1957.

GRICE, H. P. Logic and conversation. In: GRICE, H. P. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1989. p. 22-40.

HORISK, C. Dangerous jokes: how racism and sexism weaponize humor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

KARTTUNEN, L. Presupposition: what went wrong? Proceedings of SALT, v. 26, p. 705-731, 2016.

KULKA, T. The incongruity of incongruity theories of humor. Organon F, v. 14, p. 320-333, 2007.

LEVINSON, S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

MORREALL, J. (Ed.) The philosophy of laughter and humor. New York: State University of New York Press, 1987.

MORREALL, J. Philosophy of Humor. In: ZALTA, E. N. (Org.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2023. <>.

RASKIN, V. Semantic mechanisms of humor. In: CHIARELLO, C. et al. (Ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1979. p. 325-335.

SCHOPENHAUER, A. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung [1819]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2020.

SCHRÖDER, M. Experimental study of affect bursts. In: COWIE, R.; DOUGLAS-COWIE, E.; SCHRÖDER, M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the ISCA workshop “Speech and Emotion”: a conceptual framework for research. Newcastle: International Speech Communication Association, 2000. p. 132-137.

SCRUTON, R. Laughter. In: MORREALL, J. (Ed.) The philosophy of laughter and humor. New York: State University of New York Press, 1987. p. 156-171.

SEARLE, J. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

STALNAKER, R. C. Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

STIBBARD, R. Automated extraction of ToBI annotation data from the Reading/Leeds emotional speech corpus. In: COWIE, R.; DOUGLAS-COWIE, E.; SCHRÖDER, M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the ISCA workshop “Speech and Emotion”: a conceptual framework for research. Newcastle: International Speech Communication Association, 2000. p. 60-65.

STRAWSON, P. F. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review, v. 73, p. 439-460, 1964.

Published

2024-11-06

How to Cite

de Melo, D. V., & Novo, P. D. (2024). Por que não tão sério? Dispositivos pragmáticos em piadas. Aufklärung, 11(Especial), p.67–86. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v11iEspecial.70040