Neoliberalism Populism and the Crisis of Democracy through a Pragmatist and Critical Theory Approach

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i3.77586

Palavras-chave:

Populism, Neoliberalism, Democratic Crisis, Pragmatism, Critical Theory

Resumo

The rise of populism in Europe and North America over the past decade reflects a profound crisis in the foundations of modern liberal democracy. This article argues that contemporary populism must be understood as a reaction to the political, economic, and moral breakdowns caused by neoliberalism, a system that has commodified social life, eroded public institutions, and depleted citizens’ democratic imagination. Drawing on two major philosophical traditions of the 20th century, Pragmatism (John Dewey, Richard Rorty) and Critical Theory (Jürgen Habermas, Nancy Fraser, Axel Honneth), the article proposes a combined approach that is both critical and reconstructive. At the critical level, Critical Theory helps reveal how the systemic logic of neoliberalism has fragmented the “lifeworld” and replaced communicative rationality with instrumental rationality. At the reconstructive level, Pragmatism suggests possibilities for restoring civic trust and democratic community through education, dialogue, and collective action. From this, the article contends that the combination of a critical spirit and a pragmatic spirit can provide a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding and responding to the democratic crisis in the post-neoliberal era.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Nguyen Van Thoa, Hanoi National University of Education

Hanoi National University of Education, Vietnam

Referências

Bohman, J. 2011. “Methodological and Political Pluralism: Democracy, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory.” In Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory, 149–159. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203875575-14/methodological-political-pluralism-james-bohman

Bragues, G. 2006. “Richard Rorty’s Postmodern Case for Liberal Democracy: A Critique.” Humanitas 19, no. 1–2: 158–181. https://doi.org/10.5840/humanitas2006191/212

Bumochir, D. 2019. “Nationalist Sentiments Obscured by ‘Pejorative Labels’: Birthplace, Homeland and Mobilisation against Mining in Mongolia.” Inner Asia 21, no. 2: 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105018-12340124

Dalton, R. J. 2018. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press. https://byvn.net/yyPU

Demenchonok, E. 2019. “The Quest for Genuine Democracy: A Promise of Democracy to Come.” In Civility, Nonviolent Resistance, and the New Struggle for Social Justice, 342: 234. https://brill.com/display/title/56229#page=244

Dinçer, Ö. n.d. “Digital Dynamics in Public Discourse: Analyzing the Relationship Between Digital Media and Counter-Public Spheres.” Yeni Medya, no. 17: 16–34. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yenimedya/issue/88840/1509203

Foster, J. B., and H. Holleman. 2010. “The Financial Power Elite.” Monthly Review 62, no. 1: 1–19. https://byvn.net/jdcA

Fraser, N. 2017. “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History.” In Citizenship Rights, 393–413. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315260211-17/feminism-capitalism-cunning-history-nancy-fraser

Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Frega, R. 2014. “Between Pragmatism and Critical Theory: Social Philosophy Today.” Human Studies 37, no. 1: 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9290-0

Gandesha, S. 2018. “Understanding Right and Left Populism.” In Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism, 9: 49–70. London: University of Westminster Press. https://byvn.net/fX5B

Garnham, N. 2007. “Habermas and the Public Sphere.” Global Media and Communication 3, no. 2: 201–214. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1742766507078417

Giroux, H. A. 2023. “Critical Theory and Educational Practice.” In The Critical Pedagogy Reader, 50–74. London: Routledge. https://byvn.net/w8rO

Goldberg, S. R. 2019. “Dewey’s Ideas in Action! Continuing Professional Development in an International Community of Practice.” Education and Culture 35, no. 1: 71–100. https://doi.org/10.5703/educationculture.35.1.0071

Gottlieb, R. S. 1981. “The Contemporary Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.” Ethics 91, no. 2: 280–295. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/292228?journalCode=et

Habermas, J. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.

Harvey, D. 2005. Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Vol. 8. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. Hirsch Jr., E. D. 2008. “Rorty and the Priority of Democracy to Philosophy.” New Literary History 39, no. 1: 35–52. https://byvn.net/20lL

Honneth, A. 1998. “Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation: John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today.” Political Theory 26, no. 6: 763–783. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0090591798026006001

Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso. https://byvn.net/8qf8

Marcelo, G. 2020. “Tasks for a Critical Theory of Democracy in Europe.” Azimuth: Philosophical Coordinates in Modern and Contemporary Age 16, no. 2: 171–187. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4823378

Reason, P. 2003. “Pragmatist Philosophy and Action Research: Readings and Conversation with Richard Rorty.” Action Research 1, no. 1: 103–123. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14767503030011007

Ridley, D. B. 2019. “The Method of Democracy: John Dewey’s Critical Social Theory.” PhD diss., University of Birmingham. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/9817

Rorty, R. 1998. Achieving Our Country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://www.grahamseibert.com/Reviews/Society/Achieving%20our%20Country.pdf

Rundell, J. 2020. “Jürgen Habermas.” In Social Theory, 133–140. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003117261-17/j%C3%BCrgen-habermas-john-rundell

Shalin, D. N. 1992. “Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge.” American Journal of Sociology 98, no. 2: 237–279. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/230008

Shook, J. R. 2010. “Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Public Democracy.” Revue Française d’Études Américaines 124, no. 2: 11–28. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.124.0011

Shusterman, R. 1994. “Pragmatism and Liberalism between Dewey and Rorty.” Political Theory 22, no. 3: 391–413. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0090591794022003002

Urbinati, N. 2013. “The Populist Phenomenon.” Raisons Politiques 51, no. 3: 137–154. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.051.0137.

Werhane, P. H. 2006. “A Place for Philosophers in Applied Ethics and the Role of Moral Reasoning in Moral Imagination: A Response to Richard Rorty.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16, no. 3: 401–408. doi:10.5840/beq200616331

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2026-01-02

Como Citar

Thoa, N. V. (2026). Neoliberalism Populism and the Crisis of Democracy through a Pragmatist and Critical Theory Approach. Aufklärung: Journal of Philosophy, 12(3), p.101–112. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v12i3.77586

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.