DIFFERENTIATION OF RESPONSIBILITY AS AN EXPRESSION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49976Palavras-chave:
criminal law; criminal liability; differentiationResumo
The proposed article studies the differentiation of criminal responsibility from the standpoint of implementing the principle of justice. The authors point out, along with positive decisions of the legislator, to the imperfection of the regulation in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of differentiation of criminal responsibility from the standpoint of the principle of justice.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Albrecht H.J. (2015). Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing. – Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (1), P. 211-236.
Berar C. (2014). The individualization of punishment according to the new criminal code. – URL: http://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/WorkingPapers/wpconf151203.pdf.
Chistyakov A.A. (2020). Criminal Liability and the Mechanism of its Foundation. – М.: Zakon i Pravo, 2002. P. 43.
Conte P., (1998). Maistre du Сhambon p. Droit penal general. P., 1998. P. 237.
Cornel O. (2010). Differentiation and individualization of the penalty of imprisonment, (deprivation of liberty). – URL: http:// www.cnaa.md/en/thesis/16124.
Karpushin, M. P., & Kurlyandskiy, V. I. (1984). Criminal responsibility and corpus delicti. M, 984, 39.
Naumov A.V. (2016). Russian Criminal Law: Lecture Course: in 3 volumes. V. 1: Common Part. – М.: Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation, 2016. P. 426.
Piontkovsky A.A. (1962). The Doctrine of the Crime. - M., 1962. P. 45.
pravo Rossii, U. (2013). Obshchaya chast'[Criminal law of Russia. A common part]. Tyumen, Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation.
Retunskih I.S. C(1989). riminal Responsibility and its Implementation under the Soviet Legislation // Criminal Responsibility: Problems of Maintenance, Establishment, Implementation. – Voronezh: Publishing House of the Voronezh University, 1989. P. 113.
Santalov A.I. (1982). The Theoretical Basis of Criminal Liability. - L.: Publishing House Leningradsk. University, 1982. P. 12.
Berar C. (2014). The individualization of punishment according to the new criminal code. – URL: http://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/WorkingPapers/wpconf151203.pdf.
Chistyakov A.A. (2020). Criminal Liability and the Mechanism of its Foundation. – М.: Zakon i Pravo, 2002. P. 43.
Conte P., (1998). Maistre du Сhambon p. Droit penal general. P., 1998. P. 237.
Cornel O. (2010). Differentiation and individualization of the penalty of imprisonment, (deprivation of liberty). – URL: http:// www.cnaa.md/en/thesis/16124.
Karpushin, M. P., & Kurlyandskiy, V. I. (1984). Criminal responsibility and corpus delicti. M, 984, 39.
Naumov A.V. (2016). Russian Criminal Law: Lecture Course: in 3 volumes. V. 1: Common Part. – М.: Federal Chamber of Lawyers of the Russian Federation, 2016. P. 426.
Piontkovsky A.A. (1962). The Doctrine of the Crime. - M., 1962. P. 45.
pravo Rossii, U. (2013). Obshchaya chast'[Criminal law of Russia. A common part]. Tyumen, Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation.
Retunskih I.S. C(1989). riminal Responsibility and its Implementation under the Soviet Legislation // Criminal Responsibility: Problems of Maintenance, Establishment, Implementation. – Voronezh: Publishing House of the Voronezh University, 1989. P. 113.
Santalov A.I. (1982). The Theoretical Basis of Criminal Liability. - L.: Publishing House Leningradsk. University, 1982. P. 12.
Downloads
Publicado
2019-12-24
Como Citar
YU. BOKOVNYA, A. .; R. SUNDUROV, F. . DIFFERENTIATION OF RESPONSIBILITY AS AN EXPRESSION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE . Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 7, 2019. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49976. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/49976. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Seção Livre
