THE IDENTITY OF THE PERPETRATOR OF THE CRIME AS AN INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PUNISHMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.50016Palavras-chave:
crime; criminal law; criminal liability.Resumo
The article examines the phenomenon of the identity of the perpetrator of a crime in the mechanism of individualization of criminal punishment. It is pointed out that although the criminal act acts as the main dimension of the indentity of the perpetrator of a crime, it is of fundamental importance in the punishment individualization mechanism to take into account the individual diversity inherent in any perpetrator’s personality that may be reflected in the crime or not characterize it.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Antonyan Yu.M., Kudryavtsev V.N., Eminov V.E. (2004). The Perpetrator's Identity. - SPb.: Legal Center Press, 2004. P. 12.
Balafendiyev A.M. (2017). Exemption from Criminal Liability due to Positive Post-Criminal Behavior. – Kazan: Publishing House of the Kazan University, 2017. P. 4-5.
Berar C. (2018). The individualization of punishment according to the new criminal code. Proceedings of the International Conference «Recent Advances in Economic and Social Research» (13-14 May, 2015), Bucharest, Romania. [Electronic resource] Retrieved on 13 June 2018 from URL: http://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/WorkingPapers/wpconf151203.pdf
Bluvshtein Yu.D. (1978). The Concept of the Perpetrator's Identity / State and Law. 1978. No. 8. P. 98.
Suess M.K. (2013). Punishment in the State of Nature: John Locke and Criminal Punishment in the United States of America / Matthew K. Suess, Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2015. №7 (2). P. 367-397;
Albrecht H.J. Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing. – Law and Contemporary Problems, 2013. № 76 (1). P. 211-236.
Sundurov F.R., Talan M.V. (2015). Punishment in Criminal Law: Study Guide. – М.: Statut, 2015. P. 69
Balafendiyev A.M. (2017). Exemption from Criminal Liability due to Positive Post-Criminal Behavior. – Kazan: Publishing House of the Kazan University, 2017. P. 4-5.
Berar C. (2018). The individualization of punishment according to the new criminal code. Proceedings of the International Conference «Recent Advances in Economic and Social Research» (13-14 May, 2015), Bucharest, Romania. [Electronic resource] Retrieved on 13 June 2018 from URL: http://www.ipe.ro/RePEc/WorkingPapers/wpconf151203.pdf
Bluvshtein Yu.D. (1978). The Concept of the Perpetrator's Identity / State and Law. 1978. No. 8. P. 98.
Suess M.K. (2013). Punishment in the State of Nature: John Locke and Criminal Punishment in the United States of America / Matthew K. Suess, Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2015. №7 (2). P. 367-397;
Albrecht H.J. Sentencing in Germany: Explaining Long-Term Stability in the Structure of Criminal Sanctions and Sentencing. – Law and Contemporary Problems, 2013. № 76 (1). P. 211-236.
Sundurov F.R., Talan M.V. (2015). Punishment in Criminal Law: Study Guide. – М.: Statut, 2015. P. 69
Downloads
Publicado
2019-12-24
Como Citar
YU. BOKOVNYA, A. .; R. SUNDUROV , F. . THE IDENTITY OF THE PERPETRATOR OF THE CRIME AS AN INDIVIDUALIZATION OF PUNISHMENT. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 7, 2019. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.50016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/50016. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Seção Livre
