Brazilian Model of Library and Information Studies in the Bachelor's level
Keywords:
LIS education, Library and information science undergraduate studies, Curiculum development, content selection, BrazilAbstract
The article is aimed to improve the academic education in the field of library and information science in Brazil by structuring the curricular reasoning that shapes the contents of undergraduate academic programs. It is the second article of a group of two articles that resulted from a study conducted in Brazil in 2011– 2014. The first article presents a universal model1 of LIS programs (ZINS; SANTOS, 2015, in press). This article presents the Brazilian model2. This part of the research was composed of two methodological phases. The first phase was a systematic Critical Delphi study with 21 leading information science scholars from Brazil. The second phase was an unsystematic formative evaluation of the content categories. The evaluation was based on a Grounded theory study of 13 academic programs in Brazil. The study resulted in a model2 that sets the guiding principles for developing undergraduate programs in Brazil. The model is actually composed of two complementary models; a systematic four step developing process (model2.1) and a structured plan of 288 content categories (model2.2). The study improves the development and evaluation of LIS programs in Brazil by providing a structured model for content selection. The study stresses the key role of the curricular reasoning for improving LIS education in Brazil; a curricular reasoning that is grounded in the Brazilian milieu.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows sharing of the work with mandatory acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided there is acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) only after the official publication of the article by the journal, thereby preserving the confidentiality of the double-blind peer review. This subsequent sharing has the potential to increase the impact and citation of the published work.


