EDUCATION, ANIMAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS

removing the anthropocentric paradigm

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1983-1579.2018v3n11.40557

Keywords:

Education, Speciesism, Empathy

Abstract

This article intends to defend the urgency of promoting a broad revision of the anthropocentric bias that has marked the programmatic contents of the different disciplines offered in Brazilian schools, in most diverse segments. In this sense, it bets on a reflection on the ethical basis on how non-human animals are being presented in formal educational spaces. We believe that the consolidation of the environmental debate surrounding issues such as garbage, pollution, health and conservation of species reiterates anthropocentrism and contributes to the unfeasibility of animals and environmental issues. It is, therefore, to lead the debate to a new paradigm, namely: the search for a form of non-specific education. For this, we intend, firstly, to present convergent basic concepts of animal and environmental ethics, so that we can identify the question regarding the relational value present in the environmental debate. From a different perspective on the place of animals and the environment, we intend to defend a pedagogical proposal that assumes the role of questioning the various forms of injustices committed against animals and the environment and, at the same time, presenting the notion of capacity imaginative, capable of stimulating individuals to reflect on the human-environment-human-animal relationship more empathically, through the mobilization of visual resources such as films and photographs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Fabio Alves Gomes Oliveira, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil.

PhD in Philosophy from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and Adjunct Professor of Philosophy of Education at the Universidade Federal Fluminense.

Maria Clara Dias, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

PhD in Philosophy from Freie Universitat Berlin and Full Professor of Philosophy at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

References

ADAMS, Carol, GRUEN, Lori. (ed.) Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth. Bloomsbury Academic, 2014

DIAS, Maria Clara. (org.) A Perspectiva dos funcionamentos: por uma abordagem moral mais inclusiva. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Pirilampo, 2015.

___. Ensaios sobre a Moralidade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Pirilampo, 2016.

___. Sobre Nós: expandindo as fronteiras da moralidade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Pirilampo, 2016b.

DIAS, Maria Clara; OLIVEIRA, Fabio Alves Gomes. (org.) Ética Animal: Um Novo Tempo. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Livros Ilimitados, 2018.

GILLIGAN, Carol. A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge M.A: Harvard University Press, 1982

.

HORTA, Oscar. El antropocentrismo y el argumento de los vínculos emocionales, em Dilemata, n. 1, 2009, pp 1-13.

PLUMWOOD, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London-NY, Routledge, 1993.

PULEO, Alicia. Libertad, igualdad, sostenibilidad. Por un ecofeminismo ilustrado. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política, 38, 2008: 39-59.

___. Ecofeminismo para otro mundo posible. Madrid, Cátedra, 2011.

KANT, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Werke, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968.

REGAN, Tom. Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics. In: BERGANDI, Donato. The structural links between ecology, evolution, and ethics: the virtuous epistemic circle. Bioscience, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2014, 64 (3). pp.117-126.

REGAN, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. In: SINGER, Peter (ed.). Defense of Animals. Blackwell, 1985.

SINGER, P. Libertação Animal. Trad. MarlyWinckler, ed Lugano, Porto Alegre, São Paulo, 2004.

___. Practical Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press e Williams, 1993.

WARREN, Karen. Ecofeminist Philosophy. A Western Perspective on What it is and Why it Matters. Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.

MOORE, Adrian William (eds.) The Human Prejudice in Bernard Williams, Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, F. A. G.; DIAS, M. C. EDUCATION, ANIMAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: removing the anthropocentric paradigm. Curriculum Space Journal, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 11, 2018. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.1983-1579.2018v3n11.40557. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/rec/article/view/ufpb.1983-1579.2018v3n11.40557. Acesso em: 11 may. 2024.