CREATIVE FATHERHOOD BEHIND BARS: THE READ TO YOUR CHILD PROGRAM

CREATIVE FATHERHOOD BEHIND BARS: THE READ TO YOUR CHILD PROGRAM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2359-7003.2020v29n2.53969

Keywords:

Correctional education., Family literacy., Incarcerated fathers., Incarcerated parents.

Abstract

More than one-half of incarcerated people in the USA are parents of minor children. Family literacy and read-aloud programs not only provide these parents with ways to connect and communicate with their children, but also encourage children’s learning and literacy development through creative means. Research on such programs, however, is scarce. This article presents an analysis of one such family literacy program operating in a rural Pennsylvania prison. Using qualitative data, the authors describe the Read to Your Child/Grandchild (RYCG) program and the experiences of the 11 fathers who participated in the program in fall 2018. The article examines how the program bridges gaps between fathers and children in communication, physical presence, and literacy development; the unique benefits the program’s components afford its participants; and the fathers’ acts of creativity and creation while in a restricted carceral setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tabitha Stickel, Penn State University

PhD Candidate in Pennsylvania State University’s Lifelong Learning and Adult Education Program. Her dissertation research focuses on adult basic education (ABE) students with diverse linguistic backgrounds, their educational experiences both past and present, and the socioemotional dynamics in adult education classrooms influencing how students experience such spaces. Tabitha graduated from Teachers College, Columbia University with her M.Ed. from the Adult Learning and Leadership program.  She continues to work with a former professor as an associate lecturer at Columbia University’s School of Professional Studies. 

Anna Kaiper-Marquez, Pennsylvania State University, USA

Dr. Anna Kaiper is the Associate Director and Assistant Teaching Professor of the Institute for the Study of Adult Literacy and the Goodling Institute for Research in Family Literacy in the College of Education at Pennsylvania State University. She completed her dissertation in Comparative and International Development Education at the University of Minnesota that, over a three-year span, centered on the adult English language learning and literacy of domestic workers in South Africa. From this research, she has published several journals articles, book chapters, and book reviews on adult basic education (ABE), English language learning, and qualitative methodologies in national and international contexts. Prior to beginning her doctoral studies, Anna was a GED and ESL instructor for adults at Northern New Mexico Community College in Espanola, New Mexico. Within this role, she oversaw the distance learning program for ABE students and concurrently acted as a naturalization tutor for her ESL students. Additionally, Anna has taught English as a Foreign Language and Business English to K-12.

Esther Prins, Lifelong Learning and Adult Education Program at Penn State

Esther Prins is a Professor in the Lifelong Learning and Adult Education Program at Penn State, where she also serves as the Co-Director of the Goodling Institute for Research in Family Literacy and the Institute for the Study of Adult Literacy. Her research interests include critical and participatory approaches to adult education (particularly adult and family literacy), community development, and research, both in the USA and internationally.

References

Alexander, K.P., Powell, B. & Green, S.C. (2011). Understanding modal affordances: Student perceptions of potentials and limitations in multimodal composition. Basic Writing eJournal, 10(11), 40-60.

Brewster, L. (2014). The impact of prison arts programs on inmate attitudes and behavior: A quantitative evaluation. Justice Policy Journal, 11(2), 1-28.

Brown, A. (2017). Portrait of the incarcerated woman as a reading mother: Revealing the perceived outcomes of a shared reading program (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2019a). Prisoners in 2017 (NCJ 252156). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2019b). Jail inmates in 2017 (NCJ 251774). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Cohen, M. L. (2009). Choral singing and prison inmates: Influences of performing in a prison choir. Journal of Correctional Education, 60(1), 52-65.

Collica-Cox, K. & Furst, G. (2018). Implementing successful jail-based programming for women: A case study of planning parenting, prison and pups – Waiting to “let the dogs in.” Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 5(2), 101-119.

Conway, J. M., & Jones, E. T. (2015). Seven out of ten? Not even close: A review of research on

the likelihood of children with incarcerated parents becoming justice-involved. New Britain, CT: National Institute of Corrections, Central Connecticut State University.

Crain-Thoreson, C., & Dale, P. S. (1999). Enhancing linguistic performance: Parents and teachers as book reading partners for children with language delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(1), 28-39.

Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review (Vol. 433). London, UK: DfES.

DeHart, D., Shapiro, C., & Hardin, J. (2017). The impact of incarceration on families: A single- jurisdiction pilot study using triangulated administrative data and qualitative interviews. Summary overview. NCJRS 250657. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/250657.pdf

Finlay, J. (2014). A comparative study of family literacy programmes in UK and US prison libraries (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.

Gardner, S. (2015) Reading unites families: An interactive literacy program for incarcerated fathers and their children. Corrections Today. Retrieved from: http://www.aca.org/aca_prod_imis/Docs/Corrections%20Today/2015% 20Articles/March%202015/Garder.pdf

Geller, A., Cooper, C. E., Garfinkel, I., Schwartz-Soicher, O., & Mincy, R. B. (2012). Beyond absenteeism: Father incarceration and child development. Demography, 49(1), 49-76.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2010). Parents in prison and their minor children. NCJ 222984. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmc.pdf

Gostin, L.O., Vanchieri, C., Pope, A. (2007). Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ethical Considerations for Revisions to DHHS Regulations for Protection of Prisoners Involved in Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK19885/

Hagan, J., & Foster, H. (2012). Children of the American prison generation: Student and school spillover effects of incarcerating mothers. Law & Society Review, 46(1), 37-69.

Higgins, N. (2013). Family literacy on the inside. Public Libraries, 52(1), 30.

Haskins, A. R. (2014). Unintended consequences: Effects of paternal incarceration on child

school readiness and later special education placement. Sociological Science, 1, 141-158.

Hudson River Center for Program Development (2001). Bringing family literacy to incarcerated settings: An instructional guide. From incarceration to productive lifestyle. Glenmont, NY: Author. Retrieved from: http://en.copian.ca/library/research/hudson/bringing/bringing.pdf

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.

Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., & Paavola, S. (2006). Case studies of learning objects used in school settings. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(3), 249-267.

Kamptner, N.L., Teyber, F.H., Rockwood, N.J., & Drzewiecki, D. (2017). Evaluating the efficacy of an attachment-informed psychotherapeutic program for incarcerated parents. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 4(2), 62-81.

Lee, C. K. M. (2007). Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging. Written Communication, 24(3), 223-249.

Mears, D. P., & Siennick, S. E. (2016). Children’s life chances are hurt when their parents are sent to prison. USAPP–American Politics and Policy Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/09/23/childrens-life-chances-are-hurt-when-their-parents-are-sent-to-prison/

Muth, W.R. (2018). Fathers, prisons, and family reentry: Presencing as a framework and method. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Muth, W. R. (2006). Intergenerational literacy programs for incarcerated parents and their families: A review of the literature. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.

Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday Books.

Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-44. Retrieved from http://edithlaw.ca/cs449/2018/files/norman99.pdf

Nutbrown, C., Clough, P., Stammers, L., Emblin, N., & Alston-Smith, S. (2019). Family literacy in prisons: Fathers’ engagement with their young children. Research Papers in Education,34(2), 169-191.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Paratore, J. (2001). Opening doors, opening opportunities: Family literacy in an urban community. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (PA DOC). (2013, April). ‘Read to Your Child/Grandchild’ Program Returns. Retrieved from: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/read-to-your-childgrandchild-programme-returns-202347151.html

Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (PA DOC). (2019a). For family and friends. https://www.cor.pa.gov/family-and-friends/Pages/default.aspx

Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (PA DOC). (2019b). FAQ – New Procedures. https://www.cor.pa.gov/Initiatives/Pages/FAQ-New-Procedures.aspx

Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral Costs: Incarceration’s effects on economic mobility. Washington, DC: Author.

Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and

synthesis of the literature. AMCIS 2014 Proceedings, 2014, Savannah, United States.

Prins, E., Stickel, T. & Kaiper-Marquez, A. (2020). Supporting children’s literacy, learning, and education: Incarcerated fathers’ experiences in the Read to Your Child/Grandchild program. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 6(2), 168-188. doi: 10.25771/n1x0- y832

Quinn-Kong, E. (2018, August). This Texas organization uses books to reconnect female prison

inmates with their children. Woman’s Day. Retrieved from https://www.womansday.com/life/inspirational-stories/a22553956/womens-storybook-project-inmate-program/

Stevens, V. (2000). The Importance of Creativity, Emotional Intelligence and the Arts for Education in the 21st Century. Presented at the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from http://drvictoriastevens.com/publications/stevens_edu21update2000.pdf

Stickel, T., Prins, E. & Kaiper-Marquez, A. (under review). ‘The video is an upgrade from them all’: How incarcerated fathers view the affordances of video in a family literacy program. Learning, Media, and Technology.

Tett, L., Anderson, K., McNeill, F., Overy, K., & Sparks, R. (2016). Learning, rehabilitation and the arts in prisons: a Scottish case study. Studies in the Education of Adults, 44(2), 171-185.

Troy, V., McPherson, K. E., Emslie, C., & Gilchrist, E. (2018). The feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness, and effectiveness of parenting and family support programs delivered in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(6), 1732-1747.

Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Zoukis, C. (2017). Parents in prison read to children to boost literacy and connection. Huff Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/parents-in-prison-read-to-children-to-boost-literacy_b_58f8fdfbe4b0de26cfeae1b7

Downloads

Published

2020-07-30

How to Cite

STICKEL, T.; KAIPER-MARQUEZ, A.; PRINS, E. CREATIVE FATHERHOOD BEHIND BARS: THE READ TO YOUR CHILD PROGRAM: CREATIVE FATHERHOOD BEHIND BARS: THE READ TO YOUR CHILD PROGRAM. Revista Temas em Educação, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 2, 2020. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2359-7003.2020v29n2.53969. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs/index.php/rteo/article/view/53969. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 2 (2020): RTE (May-Aug.) - Continuous Flow

Section

DOSSIER - EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS IN THE AREA OF DEPRIVATION OF FR

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Licença Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine. . Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See O Efeito do Acesso Livre).