RETHINKING RETURN:

BETWEEN RESULTS AND STAGES

Authors

  • Juliana P. Lima Caruso PPGAS/USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2447-9837.2024.n18.70217

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Starting from the idea of restitution of data to the interlocutors participating in the research, this article seeks to reflect on the place of genealogies in restitution. The representativeness, the materiality, as well as the meanings of genealogies, become crucial to call into question whether they are a restitution of results, data, or other forms. To do this, the author´s most recent restitution (from research still underway on hereditary syndrome) was compared with previous research conducted by the author
in which, in all cases and in diverse ways, genealogies were the object of restitution. I
argued that genealogies are primarily a contextual object of restitution, in which the
uniqueness of each interlocutor and situation promotes differentiated and dynamic dialogues. Also, its status as an image, sketch, drawing, and document allows for multiple ways in which it can be a restitution.
KEYWORDS: Genealogy, restitution, kinship, fieldwork

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Overlapping genealogies

Published

2025-03-12

Issue

Section

Dossier Reflections and practices on the return of research and extension data