DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE EVIDENCIA DIGITAL EN LA PRÁCTICA JUDICIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49977Palavras-chave:
evidence, digital evidence, written evidenceResumo
In this study, the authors consider digital evidence through the prism of implementing the idea of e-justice. The authors suggest that there is a need to regulate by law the rules for determining the admissibility and reliability of evidence, as well as to determine the range of possible actions and powers of the court and participants in the process when studying digital evidence.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Mason S., Rasmussen U. (2016). The Use of Electronic Evidence in Civil and Administrative Law Proceedings and Its Effect on the Rules of Evidence and Modes of Proof. Strasbourg, 27 July 2016 CDCJ(2015)14 // – URL: https://rm.coe.int/1680700298.
Manes, G. W., Downing, E., Watson, L., & Thrutchley, C. (2007). New federal rules and digital evidence.
Kutsenko T. M. (2016). New types of documents and material evidence in the proceedings for administrative offences: problems of theory and legal regulation in the Russian Federation: the dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences. SPb., 2016. P. 89.
Laevskaya A.V. (2017). Digital evidence in the civil and economic process of the Republic of Belarus: Extended abstract of Candidate of legal sciences dissertation. Minsk, 2017. P. 4.
Bonner A.T. (2013). Traditional and non-traditional means of evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings: Monograph. M.: Prospect, 2013. P. 340 - 544.
Mitrofanova M.A. (2013). Digital evidence and the principle of immediacy in the arbitration process: Extended abstract of Candidate of legal sciences dissertation. Saratov, 2013. P. 13.
Manes, G. W., Downing, E., Watson, L., & Thrutchley, C. (2007). New federal rules and digital evidence.
Kutsenko T. M. (2016). New types of documents and material evidence in the proceedings for administrative offences: problems of theory and legal regulation in the Russian Federation: the dissertation of the Candidate of Legal Sciences. SPb., 2016. P. 89.
Laevskaya A.V. (2017). Digital evidence in the civil and economic process of the Republic of Belarus: Extended abstract of Candidate of legal sciences dissertation. Minsk, 2017. P. 4.
Bonner A.T. (2013). Traditional and non-traditional means of evidence in civil and arbitration proceedings: Monograph. M.: Prospect, 2013. P. 340 - 544.
Mitrofanova M.A. (2013). Digital evidence and the principle of immediacy in the arbitration process: Extended abstract of Candidate of legal sciences dissertation. Saratov, 2013. P. 13.
Downloads
Publicado
2019-12-24
Como Citar
A. VALEEVA, G. .; N. MAKOLKIN, N. . DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN JUDICIAL PRACTICE EVIDENCIA DIGITAL EN LA PRÁCTICA JUDICIAL. Gênero & Direito, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 7, 2019. DOI: 10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n7.49977. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ged/article/view/49977. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Seção Livre
