A knowledge taxonomy in the context of organizational routines: an study in a public university
Keywords:
knowledge taxonomy, knowledge management techniques, grounded theory,Abstract
Knowledge is one of the most important assets in organizations. While there are several studies about knowledge management, there are few texts dedicated to classifying the existing types of knowledge. As such, the concept of knowledge is overlooked in the literature. Hence, this situation poses a dilemma: how could a thing that is not well understood be adequately managed? Drawing on current knowledge taxonomies and the organizational routines concept, we address this gap by outlining a taxonomy of how knowledge is manifested in the execution and structuration of organizational routines. This taxonomy is generated through the grounding process of examining the organizational routines of an academic department in a public university. As the main result, it was identified four basic types of knowledge: stable-reproducible, problem-solving, incremental-shift, and paradigmatic-shift. As main theoretical contribution, this paper introduces a knowledge taxonomy, which is an alternative view in relation to the current taxonomies. As a practical implication, these four types of knowledge presented point out to the necessity of the development of specific knowledge management practices for each type of knowledge.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows sharing of the work with mandatory acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), provided there is acknowledgment of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) only after the official publication of the article by the journal, thereby preserving the confidentiality of the double-blind peer review. This subsequent sharing has the potential to increase the impact and citation of the published work.


