Bibliometric Analysis On Human Rights In The Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1678-2593.2025v24n56.76010Keywords:
Human rights; Amazon; Bibliometrics; Social inclusion.Abstract
This article aims to carry out a bibliometric analysis of scientific production on human rights in the Amazon between 2014 and 2024. The aim was to identify the evolution of scientific production on human rights in the Amazon, the most recurrent authors, the institutions, journals, co-authorship networks, and keywords, as well as to map thematic gaps, with emphasis on studies addressing the inclusion of vulnerable groups. A quantitative and descriptive approach was adopted, using bibliometric techniques. Data were collected from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science and Science e Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and analyzed with the support of VOSviewer software. The results reveal a significant increase in publications during the period, highlighting the role of institutions from Northern Brazil and researchers engaged in intersectional themes. However, there is a lack of studies focused on people with disabilities and social inclusion in Amazonian contexts. It is concluded that, despite scientific advances, persistent silences remain that must be addressed by a critical and territorialized science committed to social justice and the diversity of Amazonian peoples.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A Prim@ Facie detém direitos exclusivos de publicação e distribuição sob concessão absolutamente franca da parte do autor, ou autores.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os autores estão cientes de que transferem seus direitos de publicação e distribuição à revista Prima Facie. Os autores autorizam o uso do trabalho para fins não-comerciais, incluindo direito de enviar o trabalho em bases de dados de Acesso Livre. As provas finais poderão não ser enviadas aos autores antes da publicação, seguindo a revista seu padrão técnico explicitado nas suas normas e nos formatos praticados em acordo com a CAPES e com padrões de excelência adotados. As opiniões emitidas pelos autores são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade não sendo a revista solidária da livre opinião exposta por eles.