Percursos metodológicos sob a perspectiva da Teoria Ator-Rede:
revisão integrativa e recomendações
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2238-104X.2025v15n1.71270Palavras-chave:
teoria ator-rede, metodologia de pesquisa, coleta e análise de dadosResumo
Objetivo: Este estudo investiga a compatibilidade entre métodos de coleta e análise de dados e a ontologia da Teoria Ator-Rede (ANT), buscando recomendações metodológicas alinhadas a seus princípios fundamentais. Metodologia: Realizamos uma revisão integrativa da literatura com 42 artigos empíricos publicados nos últimos cinco anos, analisando os métodos de coleta e análise de dados empregados. A partir disso, propomos um modelo metodológico baseado na ANT. Principais resultados: Entrevistas, pesquisa documental e observação foram os métodos de coleta mais usados, com a análise temática predominando entre os métodos de análise. Destacamos que a centralidade do ator humano ainda é comum em muitas pesquisas. Contribuições acadêmicas: Apresentamos um modelo composto pela análise temática como etapa inicial, combinada com outros métodos para melhor alinhamento com a agência da ANT. Contribuições práticas: A ANT pode auxiliar na interação entre tecnologias, processos e pessoas, influenciando a comunicação e identificando pontos críticos nessas relações. Dessa forma, a gestão pode identificar oportunidades de inovação e melhorias nos processos organizacionais.
Downloads
Referências
Abboubi, M. El, Pinnington, A. H., Clegg, S. R., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2022). Involving, Countering, and Overlooking Stakeholder Networks in Soft Regulation: Case Study of a Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprise’s Implementation of SA8000. Business and Society, 61(6), 1594–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211017508
Américo, B. L., Carniel, F., & Clegg, S. R. (2019). Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies. European Management Journal, 37(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.11.005
Beunza, D., & Ferraro, F. (2019). Performative Work: Bridging Performativity and Institutional Theory in the Responsible Investment Field. Organization Studies, 40(4), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617747917
Bobadilla, N., Goransson, M., & Pichault, F. (2019). Urban entrepreneurship through art-based interventions: unveiling a translation process. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(5–6), 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1539125
Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O Método Da Revisão Integrativa Nos Estudos Organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220
Bowden, V., Gond, J. P., Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. (2021). Turning Back the Rising Sea: Theory performativity in the shift from climate science to popular authority. Organization Studies, 42(12), 1909–1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211024558
Braga, C., & Suarez, M. (2018). Teoria Ator-Rede: novas perspectivas e contribuições para os estudos de consumo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395164275
Burgess, J., & Jones, C. (2020). Exploring the forced closure of a brand community that is also a participatory culture. European Journal of Marketing, 54(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2019-0075
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406880090020
Bussular, C. Z., Burtet, C. G., & Antonello, C. S. (2020). The actor-network theory as a method in the analysis of Samarco disaster in Brazil. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2017-1520
Caldwell, R., & Dyer, C. (2020). The performative practices of consultants in a change network: an actor–network practice perspective on organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 941–963. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2019-0318
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Callon, M. (2012). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed., pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Camillis, P. K. de, Bignetti, B., & Petrini, M. (2020). Percursos da teoria ator-rede nas pesquisas brasileiras em administração. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 14(4), 93–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i4.44341
Capaverde, C. B., Medeiros, I. B. de O., Antonello, C. S., & Rodrigues, M. B. (2021). Subjectivities behind the wheel: transformations in work relations of drivers in Brazil. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2019-1911
Clifton, J., Fachin, F., & Cooren, F. (2021). How Artefacts Do Leadership: A Ventriloquial Analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318921998078
Clifton, J., & Mueni, J. (2021). The romance of human leaders? A socio-material analysis of a follower’s account of being inspired. Culture and Organization, 27(5), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2020.1844203
Cochoy, F. (2008). Calculation, qualculation, calqulation: Shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593107086483
Cooren, F. (2015). Studying agency from a ventriloqual perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915584825
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory (speculative realism). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (11th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dorland, J., Clausen, C., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2019). Space configurations for empowering university-community interactions. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz022
Dupret, K. (2019). Performative Silences: Potentiality of Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 40(5), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759816
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2011). Actor-Network Theory, ANTi-History and critical organizational historiography. Organization, 19(6), 703-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411420196
Fernandes, J., Mason, K., & Chakrabarti, R. (2019). Managing to make market agencements: The temporally bound elements of stigma in favelas. Journal of Business Research, 95(October 2018), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.006
Fletcher, D., & Watson, T. (2007). Voice, silence and the business of construction: Loud and quiet voices in the construction of personal, organizational and social realities. Organization, 14(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407074221
Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books..
Gooneratne, T. N., & Hoque, Z. (2021). The fate of the balanced scorecard: alternative problematization and competing networks. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 18(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0028
Hajli, N., Saeed, U., Tajvidi, M., & Shirazi, F. (2022). Social Bots and the Spread of Disinformation in Social Media: The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1238–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12554
Hultin, L., Introna, L. D., & Mähring, M. (2021). The decentered translation of management ideas: Attending to the conditioning flow of everyday work practices. Human Relations, 74(4), 587–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719897967
Hyman, M. R., Kostyk, A., & Trafimow, D. (2022). True Consumer Autonomy: A Formalization and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 183, 841–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05114-0
Jensen, T., & Sandström, J. (2020). Organizing rocks: Actor–network theory and space. Organization, 27(5), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419842715
Lamine, W., Fayolle, A., Jack, S., & Byrne, J. (2019). The role of materially heterogeneous entities in the entrepreneurial network. Industrial Marketing Management, 80(December 2015), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.004
Latour, B. (2001). A esperança de Pandora: ensaios sobre a realidade dos estudos científicos. Bauru, SP: Edusc.
Latour, B. (2012). Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede. Salvador, BA: Edufba.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Law, J. (1987). On the Social Explanation of Technical Change: The Case of the Portuguese Maritime Expansion. Technology and Culture, 28(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105566
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Law, J. (1999). After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1999.tb03479.x
Madsen, S. M. (2021). Gaining customer centric understanding of retail displays for future innovations. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 49(4), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2019-0280
Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ozuem, W., Ranfagni, S., Willis, M., Rovai, S., & Howell, K. (2021). Exploring customers’ responses to online service failure and recovery strategies during Covid-19 pandemic: An actor–network theory perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 38(9), 1440–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21527
Pedersen, S., Bogers, M. L. A. M., & Clausen, C. (2022). Navigating collaborative open innovation projects: Staging negotiations of actors’ concerns. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(2), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12492
Pellegrini, M., & Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2021). The Evolution of University Business Incubators: Transnational Hubs for Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920979983
Ratner, H. (2020). Topologies of Organization: Space in Continuous Deformation. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1513–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619874464
Romestant, F. (2020). Sustainability agencing: The involvement of stakeholder networks in megaprojects. Industrial Marketing Management, 89(March 2017), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.005
Sá, R. G. Q. de, & Costa, A. de S. M. da. (2019). In search of transparency: ANTi-History, memorials and resistance. Journal of Management History, 25(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0012
Scully-Russ, E., & Torraco, R. (2020). The Changing Nature and Organization of Work: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319886394
Siebert, S., & Czarniawska, B. (2020). Distrust: Not Only in Secret Service Organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618798939
Silveira, A. B. da, Levrini, G. R. D., & Ertz, M. (2022). How Digital Platforms Materialize Sustainable Collaborative Consumption: A Brazilian and Canadian Bike-Sharing Case Study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 34(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2021.1907828
Siqueira, L. B., Alcântara, J. N. de, Maciel, G. N., & Oliveira, J. A. (2020, outubro). Estratégias de inovação adotadas por empresas atuantes em países emergentes: uma revisão integrativa e elaboração de uma agenda para estudos futuros. Anais do Encontro Nacional Da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (EnANPAD), online, 44. Recuperado de http://www.anpad.org.br/eventos.php?cod_evento=1&cod_edicao_subsecao=1726&cod_evento_edicao=106&cod_edicao_trabalho=28383
Spena, T. R., & Cristina, M. (2020). Practising innovation in the healthcare ecosystem: the agency of third-party actors. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2019-0048
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tureta, C., Américo, B. L., & Clegg, S. (2021). Controversies as method for ANTi-history: An inquiry into public administration practices. Organization, 28(6), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015375
Venturini, T., & Munk, A. K. (2022). Controversy mapping: a field guide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Villar, E. G., Rese, N., & Roglio, K. de D. (2019). As múltiplas tensões do hibridismo organizacional: Um olhar da perspectiva da tradução e da estratégia aberta em um empreendimento social. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negocios, 21(3), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i3.4001
