Justiça e desempenho acadêmico:
um estudo com pós-graduandos em tempos de Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2359-7003.2023v32n1.64711Keywords:
Justiça acadêmica; sistema de avaliação de desempenho; Covid-19Abstract
Academic fairness refers to the individual assessments that students make of particular outcomes in the form of grades, established procedures, and teacher relationships. Due to the pandemic, teachers were forced to change didactic procedures for better adaptation. In this context, it is assumed that this adaptation can cause unfavorable situations that pass through the understanding of teachers, and this can interfere with some academic activities not being carried out fairly. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the perception of justice among 120 stricto sensu graduate students about the performance evaluation system and its effects on academic performance in times of Covid-19. Among the results, it can be inferred that only procedural justice affects the performance of graduate students in times of covid-19, but it was not possible to corroborate that the dimensions of distributive and interpersonal justice affect the academic performance of graduate students.
Downloads
References
BERTI, Chiara; MOLINARI, Luísa; SPELTINI, Giuseppina. Classroom justice and psychological engagement: Students’ and teachers’ representations. Social psychology of education, v. 13, n. 4, p. 541-556, 2010.
BRISLIN, Richard W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, v. 1, n. 3, p. 185-216, 1970.
BRYMAN, Alan. Social research methods. 4th ed. 2012.
ÇAGLAR, Caglar. The Relationship between the Perceptions of the Fairness of the Learning Environment and the Level of Alienation. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, v. 50, p. 185-206, 2013.
CONN, Sallee J. Across the miles: exploring the relationship between perceptions of trust and perceptions of organizational justice in a geographically dispersed organization. Gonzaga University, 2004.
CHORY‐ASSAD, Rebecca M. Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, v. 50, n. 1, p. 58-77, 2002.
CHORY‐ASSAD, Rebecca M.; PAULSEL, Michelle L. Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, v. 52, n. 2, p. 98-114, 2004a.
CHORY‐ASSAD, Rebecca M.; PAULSEL, Michelle L. Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, v. 53, n. 3, p. 253-273, 2004b.
COLARES, Ana Carolina Vasconcelos; MIRANDA, Lidiane Tereza Fagundes. Corrupção no ensino remoto na educação superior durante a pandemia do covid-19 e a percepção de justiça dos alunos. Pensar Acadêmico, v. 19, n. 5, p. 1333-1358, 2021.
DALBERT, Claudia. The implications and functions of just and unjust experiences in school. In: The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood. Routledge, 2004. p. 131-148.
DECONINCK, James B. The effect of organizational justice, perceived organizational support, and perceived supervisor support on marketing employees' level of trust. Journal of business research, v. 63, n. 12, p. 1349-1355, 2010.
FOLGER, Robert; KONOVSKY, Mary A. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management journal, v. 32, n. 1, p. 115-130, 1989.
GORARD, Stephen. Experiencing fairness at school: An international study. International Journal of Educational Research, v. 53, p. 127-137, 2012.
HAIR JR. Joseph F., et al. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2016.
HORAN, Sean M.; CHORY, Rebecca M.; GOODBOY, Alan K. Understanding students' classroom justice experiences and responses. Communication Education, v. 59, n. 4, p. 453-474, 2010.
JEON, Jeong-Ho. The impact of organizational justice and job security on organizational commitment exploring the mediating effect of trust in top management. University of Minnesota, 2009.
KONOVSKY, Mary A. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 489-511, 2000.
KOVAČEVIĆ, Ivana; ZUNIĆ, Predrag; MIHAILOVIĆ, Dobrivoje. Concept of Organizational Justice in the Context of Academic Achievement. Management, v. 18, n. 69, 2013.
NUHS, Aline Cristiane; TOMIO, Daniela. A prova escrita como instrumento de avaliação da aprendizagem do aluno de Ciências. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, v. 22, n. 49, p. 259-284, 2011.
PAULSEL, Michelle L.; CHORY-ASSAD, Rebecca M. Perceptions of instructor interactional justice as a predictor of student resistance. Communication Research Reports, v. 22, n. 4, p. 283-291, 2005.
PAULSEL, Michelle L.; CHORY-ASSAD, Rebecca M.; DUNLEAVY, Katie N. The relationship between student perceptions of instructor power and classroom justice. Communication Research Reports, v. 22, n. 3, p. 207-215, 2005.
PETER, Felix et al. Belief in a just world, teacher justice, and student achievement: A multilevel study. Learning and Individual Differences, v. 22, n. 1, p. 55-63, 2012.
PRETSCH, Johanna et al. Injustice in school and students’ emotions, well-being, and behavior: A longitudinal study. Social Justice Research, v. 29, n. 1, p. 119-138, 2016.
REGO, Arménio; SOUTO, Solange. A percepção de justiça como antecedente do comprometimento organizacional: um estudo luso-brasileiro. Revista de administração contemporânea, v. 8, p. 151-177, 2004.
RESH, Nura; SABBAGH, Clara. Sense of justice in school and civic attitudes. Social Psychology of Education, v. 17, n. 1, p. 51-72, 2014.
RIBEIRO, Flávia de Oliveira et al. Ações dos Tribunais de Contas no enfrentamento dos efeitos do coronavírus. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 54, p. 1402-1416, 2020.
ROBALINO, Magaly. Tempo de pandemia, tempo de desigualdades. direito à educação e ao trabalho docente no Equador. Revista Temas em Educação, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 3, 2020.
ROBINSON, Karen L. The impact of individual differences on the relationship between employee perceptions of organizational justice and organizational outcome variables. Alliant International University, San Diego, 2004.
SABINO, Karla Luisa Costa et al. Influência do desempenho acadêmico na percepção de justiça no ambiente de aprendizagem. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), v. 13, n. 4, 2019.
SANTOS, Débora et al. Justiça e desonestidade acadêmica: um estudo com estudantes do curso de ciências contábeis. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, v. 17, n. 44, p. 71-86, 2020.
SANTOS JUNIOR, Verissimo Barros; MONTEIRO, Jean Carlos S. Educação e covid-19: as tecnologias digitais mediando a aprendizagem em tempos de pandemia. Revista Encantar, v. 2, p. 01-15, 2020.
SANTOS, Edicreia Andrade et al. Experiências com o Ensino Remoto e os Efeitos no Interesse e na Satisfação dos Estudantes de Ciências Contábeis Durante a Pandemia da Sars-Cov-2. Revista Gestão Organizacional, v. 14, n. 1, p. 356-377, 2021.
SILVA, Shirleide Karla; PRESTES, Emília Maria T. Igualdade de gênero no ensino superior: avanços e desafios. Revista Temas em Educação, v. 27, n. 2, p. 191, 2018.
SIMIL, Andre S. A confiança como fator de influência da percepção de justiça no ambiente de aprendizagem. 2016. Disponível. https://cepcon.face.ufmg.br/cursos/mestrado/dissertacoes/category/49-2016.html. Acesso em 21 de jan. 2021.
SOTOMAYOR, Ana Maria da Silva Barbosa Avaliação de desempenho e compromisso organizacional: a perspectiva da justiça organizacional. Revista Universo Contábil, v. 3, n. 3, p. 87-100, 2007.
WEINER, Bernard; KUKLA, Andy. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, 1970.
WUBBELS, Theo; BREKELMANS, Mieke. Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International journal of educational research, v. 43, n. 1-2, p. 6-24, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Temas em Educação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Licença Creative Commons Attribution that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine. . Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
