Gobernanza pública: ¿es cierta esta nota? Un giro en el análisis del Decreto núm. 9.203/2017 con base en la reducción sociológica de Guerreiro Ramos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2525-5584.2025v10n1.69746Palabras clave:
Governança pública, Neoliberalismo, Decreto n. 9.203/2017, Gestão Social, Redução sociológicaResumen
Este estudio aborda la gobernanza pública considerando el Decreto no. 9.203/2017 basado en el pragmatismo crítico. Esta investigación propone un análisis de la valorización ético-política desde la perspectiva de la reducción sociológica de Guerreiro Ramos (Boullosa et al, 2021; Filho; Eynaud, 2020; Ramos, 1996; Serva, 2023). La reducción sociológica abarca cuatro dimensiones: contexto de producción científica, valoración ético-política, equilibrio entre métodos de investigación e intervención para pensar la realidad. El estudio propone que la gobernanza pública está ontológicamente más cerca de la gestión social y no de la gestión burocrática privada. A partir de la propuesta de valoración ético-política de la gobernanza pública en Brasil a partir del pensamiento de Guerreiro Ramos, el estudio contribuye a las siguientes comprensiones: (i) la reciente institucionalización de la política de gobernanza pública sólo instrumentaliza una discusión sin debate público; (ii) considerando que la lógica de la burocracia privada se aleja de la adopción de una gobernanza pública sustantiva, se proponen enfoques de gestión social; y (iii) se propone un giro descolonial de la agenda pública, desarrollando prácticas de aprendizaje y cambiando la cultura organizacional para la gobernanza pública. Esta visión busca poner en primer plano el interés colectivo en el desempeño de la Administración Pública, especialmente en lo que respecta a la planificación, ejecución, control y evaluación de las políticas públicas.
Descargas
Citas
Abdalla, M. M.; Faria, A. (2017). In defense of the decolonial option in administration/management. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 15(4), 914-929. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395155249
Abrucio, F. L. (2007). Recent trajectory of Brazilian public management: a critical assessment and the renewal of the reform agenda. Journal of Public Administration, Special Commemorative Edition, p. 67-86.
Aguilera, R. V.; Florackis, C.; Kim, H. (2016). Advancing the corporate governance research agenda. In: Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12167
Al-Baidhani, A. M. (2014). Review of corporate governance bundle. In: Corporate Ownership & Control, 11(4), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i4c2p1
Amos, K. (2010). Governance and governmentality: the relationship and relevance of two prominent social-scientific concepts in comparative education. In: Education and Research. São Paulo. v. 36, n. especial, p. 023-034.
Andion, C. (2023). Social innovation, experimentalism and public governance: An ethnographical approach to study public arenas in the city. In: BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 20(2), e220124. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220124
Andion, C.; Magalh es, T. (2021). (Re)bringing pragmatism closer to policy analysis public. Experimentation and public research in a scenario of democratic crisis. In: Society and State, v. 36, n. 2, p. 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020007
Ansell, C.; Torfing, J. (2016). Introduction: theories of governance. In: Handbook on theories of governance, pp. 1-18. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Borges, Andr (2000). Bureaucratic Ethics, the Market and Administrative Ideology: Contradictions in the Conservative Response to the State's "Crisis of Character". In: Dados, vol.43 n.1 Rio de Janeiro 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582000000100004
Borges, Andr (2001). Democracy versus efficiency: the theory of public choice. In: Lua Nova - Culture and Politics Magazine, n. 53, p. 159-206. S o Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64452001000200008
Boullosa, R.F.; Oliveira, B.; Ara jo, E. T.; Gussi, A. F. (2021). Towards an anti-manual of public policy evaluation. In: Brazilian Journal of Evaluation, 10(1), e100521. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202110005
Buta, B. O.; Teixeira, M. A. C. (2020). Public governance in three dimensions: conceptual, measurable and democratic. In: Organizations & Society Magazine 2020, 27(94), 370-395.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2010). Democracy, welfare state and management reform. RAE-Journal of Business Administration, v. 50, n. 1, p. 112-116.
Caldeira, D. M.; Secchi, L.; Firmino, S. I. (2023). New development: Public governance in the discursivity of the Brazilian government-a reflection on conceptual reduction. In: Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 194-196, February. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2113630
Dagnino, R. (2011). Social management and public management: interfaces, delimitations and a proposal. In: E. A. Benini, M. S. de Faria, H. T. Novaes, &R. Dagnino (org.) Public management and society: foundations and public policies of the solidarity economy. São Paulo: Outras Express es.
Dellagnelo, E. L.,&Da Silva, C.L. M. (2000). New organizational forms: where is the empirical evidence of a break with the bureaucratic model of organizations? Organizations & Society Magazine,7(19), 19-33.
Diniz, Eli. (1995), Governance, Democracy and State Reform: The Challenges of Building a New Order in Brazil in the 1990s. Dados, vol. 38, no. 3.
Faoro, R. (2021) [1958]. The Owners of Power. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 832p.
Figueiredo, M. D. (2015). Embodied intentionality: intersection between diversity and organizational practice studies. Management & Connections Magazine, 4(1), 20-44.
Filho, G. C. F., & Eynaud, P. (2020). Solidarity and organizations: thinking about another organization. Salvador: Edufba; Ateliê de Humanidades.
Gherardi, S.; Strati, A. (2014). Management and learning in practice. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good governance, R.I.P.: A critique and an alternative. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 30(1), 17-22. doi:10.1111/gove.12223
Hood, C. (1995). The "New Public Management" in the 1980's: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, v. 20, n. 2/3, p. 93-109.
Jreisat, J. (2012). Globalism and comparative public administration Boca Raton: CRC.
Kettle, D. F. (2000). The global public management revolution. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Kreuzberg, F.; Vicente, E. F. R. (2019). Where are we heading? An analysis of corporate governance research. Journal of Contemporary Administration, v. 23, n. 1, p. 43 - 66, jan. / feb. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019170381
Lejano, R. (2021). Relationality: An alternative framework for analyzing policy. In: Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 360-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X20000057
Lima, A. C.; Gussi, A. F. (2021). Can the subaltern evaluate? Possibilities of a counter-hegemonic turn as a decolonial option in the field of public policy evaluation. In: AVAL - Public Policy Evaluation Journal, December vol.6, no. 2021.
Manoel, A.; Braun Neto, Jos ; Andion, M. C. M. (2023). Studies on public governance in Brazil: analysis of scientific production and proposal for a research agenda. In: ENCONTRO DA ANPAD, 47., 2023, São Paulo. Electronic proceedings [...]. Maring : National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Administration, 2023. Available at: http://anpad.com.br/pt_br/event/ Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
Martins, H. F.; Marini, Caio. A guide to governance for results in public administration. Brasília: Publix, 2010.
Martins, H. F. (2011). A composite of public governance. Social Governance Journal IGS, Belo Horizonte, year 4, ed. 10, May/July.
Martins, H; Mota, J. P.; Marini, C. (2019). Business models in the public sphere: the public governance canvas model. In: Cad. EBAPE.BR, v. 17, n 1, Rio de Janeiro, Jan./Mar. 2019.
Mignolo, W. (2017). Coloniality: The dark side of modernity. Translated by Marco Oliveira. In: RBCS Vol. 32 n 94 June/2017: e329402.
Motta, P. R. (1987). Administrative modernization: alternative proposals for the Latin American State. Journal of Public Administration, v. 21, n. 4, p. 31-61.
Peters, B. G.; Pierre, J. (2015). Governance and policy problems: Instruments as unitary and mixed modes of policy intervention. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(4), 224-235. doi:10.1080/23276665.2015.1117179
Polanyi, Karl (1980) [1944], The Great Transformation. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Campus.
Quijano, A. (2007). "Coloniality and modernity/rationality". Cultural Studies, 21 (2-3): 22-32.
Ramos, A. G. (1989). The new science of organizations: a reconceptualization of the wealth of nations. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
Ramos, A. G. (2024) [1954]. The sociological reduction. São Paulo. Ubu Editora; 1st edition (April 22, 2024).
Santos, M. For another globalization: from single thought to universal consciousness. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2003.
Schwartzman, S. (2015) [1975]. Bases of Brazilian authoritarianism. 3. ed. rev. and amp. Editora Campus, 1988 (2nd edition, 1982). Available at: . Accessed on: March 28, 2014
Scherer-Warren, I. (2006). From mobilizations to social movement networks. Society and State, 21(1), 109-130.
Serva, M. (1997). Substantive rationality demonstrated in administrative practice. In: Journal of Business Administration, 37(2), 19-30.
Serva, M. (2023). Pragmatist analysis of organizations. In: Era Magazine, 63(1), 1-22. (1), 1-22.
Talesh, S. (2022). Public law and regulatory theory. In: Handbook on theories of governance, pp. 104-117. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Maria de Nazaré Moraes Soares
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
_.jpg)
.png){kind=logo}
.jpg)
_.png)
