Methodological paths from the perspective of Actor-Network Theory:
an integrative review and recommendations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2238-104X.2025v15n1.71270Keywords:
actor-network theory, research methodology, data collection and analysisAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates the compatibility between data collection and analysis methods and the ontology of Actor-Network Theory (ANT), aiming to provide methodological recommendations aligned with its fundamental principles. Methodology: We conducted an integrative literature review of 42 empirical articles published in the last five years, analyzing the data collection and analysis methods employed. Based on this, we propose a methodological framework grounded in ANT. Main results: Interviews, document analysis, and observation were the most used data collection methods, with thematic analysis being the predominant approach for data analysis. We highlight that the centrality of human actors remains common in many studies. Academic contributions: We present a model in which thematic analysis serves as an initial step, combined with other methods to better align with ANT’s concept of agency. Practical contributions: ANT can support the interaction between technologies, processes, and people, influencing communication and identifying critical points in these relationships. This, in turn, enables management to identify opportunities for innovation and improvements in organizational processes.
Downloads
References
Abboubi, M. El, Pinnington, A. H., Clegg, S. R., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2022). Involving, Countering, and Overlooking Stakeholder Networks in Soft Regulation: Case Study of a Small-to-Medium-Sized Enterprise’s Implementation of SA8000. Business and Society, 61(6), 1594–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211017508
Américo, B. L., Carniel, F., & Clegg, S. R. (2019). Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies. European Management Journal, 37(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.11.005
Beunza, D., & Ferraro, F. (2019). Performative Work: Bridging Performativity and Institutional Theory in the Responsible Investment Field. Organization Studies, 40(4), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617747917
Bobadilla, N., Goransson, M., & Pichault, F. (2019). Urban entrepreneurship through art-based interventions: unveiling a translation process. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(5–6), 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1539125
Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O Método Da Revisão Integrativa Nos Estudos Organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v5i11.1220
Bowden, V., Gond, J. P., Nyberg, D., & Wright, C. (2021). Turning Back the Rising Sea: Theory performativity in the shift from climate science to popular authority. Organization Studies, 42(12), 1909–1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211024558
Braga, C., & Suarez, M. (2018). Teoria Ator-Rede: novas perspectivas e contribuições para os estudos de consumo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395164275
Burgess, J., & Jones, C. (2020). Exploring the forced closure of a brand community that is also a participatory culture. European Journal of Marketing, 54(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2019-0075
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406880090020
Bussular, C. Z., Burtet, C. G., & Antonello, C. S. (2020). The actor-network theory as a method in the analysis of Samarco disaster in Brazil. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2017-1520
Caldwell, R., & Dyer, C. (2020). The performative practices of consultants in a change network: an actor–network practice perspective on organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 941–963. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2019-0318
Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
Callon, M. (2012). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed., pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Camillis, P. K. de, Bignetti, B., & Petrini, M. (2020). Percursos da teoria ator-rede nas pesquisas brasileiras em administração. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 14(4), 93–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i4.44341
Capaverde, C. B., Medeiros, I. B. de O., Antonello, C. S., & Rodrigues, M. B. (2021). Subjectivities behind the wheel: transformations in work relations of drivers in Brazil. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2019-1911
Clifton, J., Fachin, F., & Cooren, F. (2021). How Artefacts Do Leadership: A Ventriloquial Analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318921998078
Clifton, J., & Mueni, J. (2021). The romance of human leaders? A socio-material analysis of a follower’s account of being inspired. Culture and Organization, 27(5), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2020.1844203
Cochoy, F. (2008). Calculation, qualculation, calqulation: Shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593107086483
Cooren, F. (2015). Studying agency from a ventriloqual perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915584825
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory (speculative realism). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (11th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dorland, J., Clausen, C., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2019). Space configurations for empowering university-community interactions. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz022
Dupret, K. (2019). Performative Silences: Potentiality of Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 40(5), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759816
Durepos, G., & Mills, A. J. (2011). Actor-Network Theory, ANTi-History and critical organizational historiography. Organization, 19(6), 703-721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411420196
Fernandes, J., Mason, K., & Chakrabarti, R. (2019). Managing to make market agencements: The temporally bound elements of stigma in favelas. Journal of Business Research, 95(October 2018), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.006
Fletcher, D., & Watson, T. (2007). Voice, silence and the business of construction: Loud and quiet voices in the construction of personal, organizational and social realities. Organization, 14(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407074221
Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books..
Gooneratne, T. N., & Hoque, Z. (2021). The fate of the balanced scorecard: alternative problematization and competing networks. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 18(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0028
Hajli, N., Saeed, U., Tajvidi, M., & Shirazi, F. (2022). Social Bots and the Spread of Disinformation in Social Media: The Challenges of Artificial Intelligence. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1238–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12554
Hultin, L., Introna, L. D., & Mähring, M. (2021). The decentered translation of management ideas: Attending to the conditioning flow of everyday work practices. Human Relations, 74(4), 587–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719897967
Hyman, M. R., Kostyk, A., & Trafimow, D. (2022). True Consumer Autonomy: A Formalization and Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 183, 841–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05114-0
Jensen, T., & Sandström, J. (2020). Organizing rocks: Actor–network theory and space. Organization, 27(5), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419842715
Lamine, W., Fayolle, A., Jack, S., & Byrne, J. (2019). The role of materially heterogeneous entities in the entrepreneurial network. Industrial Marketing Management, 80(December 2015), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.004
Latour, B. (2001). A esperança de Pandora: ensaios sobre a realidade dos estudos científicos. Bauru, SP: Edusc.
Latour, B. (2012). Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede. Salvador, BA: Edufba.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Law, J. (1987). On the Social Explanation of Technical Change: The Case of the Portuguese Maritime Expansion. Technology and Culture, 28(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105566
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Law, J. (1999). After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1999.tb03479.x
Madsen, S. M. (2021). Gaining customer centric understanding of retail displays for future innovations. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 49(4), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2019-0280
Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ozuem, W., Ranfagni, S., Willis, M., Rovai, S., & Howell, K. (2021). Exploring customers’ responses to online service failure and recovery strategies during Covid-19 pandemic: An actor–network theory perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 38(9), 1440–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21527
Pedersen, S., Bogers, M. L. A. M., & Clausen, C. (2022). Navigating collaborative open innovation projects: Staging negotiations of actors’ concerns. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(2), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12492
Pellegrini, M., & Johnson-Sheehan, R. (2021). The Evolution of University Business Incubators: Transnational Hubs for Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920979983
Ratner, H. (2020). Topologies of Organization: Space in Continuous Deformation. Organization Studies, 41(11), 1513–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619874464
Romestant, F. (2020). Sustainability agencing: The involvement of stakeholder networks in megaprojects. Industrial Marketing Management, 89(March 2017), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.005
Sá, R. G. Q. de, & Costa, A. de S. M. da. (2019). In search of transparency: ANTi-History, memorials and resistance. Journal of Management History, 25(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-02-2018-0012
Scully-Russ, E., & Torraco, R. (2020). The Changing Nature and Organization of Work: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319886394
Siebert, S., & Czarniawska, B. (2020). Distrust: Not Only in Secret Service Organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618798939
Silveira, A. B. da, Levrini, G. R. D., & Ertz, M. (2022). How Digital Platforms Materialize Sustainable Collaborative Consumption: A Brazilian and Canadian Bike-Sharing Case Study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 34(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2021.1907828
Siqueira, L. B., Alcântara, J. N. de, Maciel, G. N., & Oliveira, J. A. (2020, outubro). Estratégias de inovação adotadas por empresas atuantes em países emergentes: uma revisão integrativa e elaboração de uma agenda para estudos futuros. Anais do Encontro Nacional Da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (EnANPAD), online, 44. Recuperado de http://www.anpad.org.br/eventos.php?cod_evento=1&cod_edicao_subsecao=1726&cod_evento_edicao=106&cod_edicao_trabalho=28383
Spena, T. R., & Cristina, M. (2020). Practising innovation in the healthcare ecosystem: the agency of third-party actors. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2019-0048
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tureta, C., Américo, B. L., & Clegg, S. (2021). Controversies as method for ANTi-history: An inquiry into public administration practices. Organization, 28(6), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015375
Venturini, T., & Munk, A. K. (2022). Controversy mapping: a field guide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Villar, E. G., Rese, N., & Roglio, K. de D. (2019). As múltiplas tensões do hibridismo organizacional: Um olhar da perspectiva da tradução e da estratégia aberta em um empreendimento social. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negocios, 21(3), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i3.4001
