Repensando a tortura: uma crítica foucaultiana à justificação da tortura-interrogatório

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v7iesp.55292

Palavras-chave:

Tortura-interrogatório, Justificação, biopolítica

Resumo

Muitos juristas e políticos insistem em justificar o uso da tortura. No presente trabalho, analiso os resultados do programa de detenção e interrogatórios da CIA, criado em 2002 para investigar e evitar futuros atentados terroristas. Demonstrarei, usando a metodologia de Foucault para a análise do poder, que a tortura em larga escala, independentemente de qualquer justificativa, serve para impor controle sobre populações insubmissas em ambientes complexos. Minhas conclusões indicam a necessidade de mudar a forma como estudamos a tortura para, a partir de uma melhor compreensão do fenômeno, tomarmos decisões mais eficazes sobre como combatê-la.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Rodolfo Jacarandá, Universidade Federal de Rondônia

Professor Asssociado do Departamento de Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Rondônia. Coordenador do Mestrado Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimento da Justiça - PPG/DHJUS e Professor do Mestrado acadêmico em Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Rondônia. Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa Ética e Direitos Humanos - CNPq/UNIR.

Referências

ALLHOFF, Fritz. A Defense of Torture: Separation of Cases, Ticking Time-bombs, and Moral Justification. Western Michigan University. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19:2 (pp. 243–264) 2005.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL. Torture in 2014 – 30 Years of Broken Promises. Amnesty International, 2014.
ARRIGO, Jean Maria. A Utilitarian Argument Against Torture Interrogation of Terrorists. Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2004.
ARRIGO, Jean Maria; BUFACCHI, Vittorio. Torture, Terrorism and the State: a Refutation of the Ticking-Bomb Argument. Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2006.
ARRIGO, Jean Maria. A Utilitarian Argument Against Torture Interrogation of Terrorists. Science and Engineering Ethics, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2004.
AUSSARESSES, Paul. The Battle of the Casbah: Terrorism and Counterterrorism in Algeria 1955–1957. New York: Enigma Books, 2002.
AUSSARESSES, Paul. Services speciaux Algerie 1955-1957 - Mon temoignage sur la torture. Paris/France: Éditions Perrins, 2001.
BAGARIC, Mirko; CLARKE, Julie. Torture - When the Unthinkable Is Morally Permissible. New York: State University of New York Press, 2007.
COHAN, John Alan. Torture and the Necessity Doctrine. 41 Val. U. L. Rev. 1587, 2007.
DAVIES, Jeremy. The Fireraisers: Bentham and Torture. 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century, 15, 2012.
DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat, Responding to the Challenge. Yale University Press, 2002.
DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. The Torture Warrant – A response to Professor Strauss. New York Law School Law Review, v. 48, 2003.
DERSHOWITZ, Alan M. Is There a Right to Remain Silent? coercive interrogation and the fifth amendment after 9/11. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigiar e punir. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2000.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Em defesa da sociedade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Segurança. Território e população. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.
GREENBERG, Karen. DRATEL, Joshua L. The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH. Torture and ill-treatment - Israel's Interrogation of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. HRW/Middle East. United States of America, 1994.
LUBAN, David. Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb. Virginia Law Review, 91, 1425-1461, 2005.
MARAN, R. Torture: The Role of Ideology in the French-Algerian War. New York: Praeger, 1989.
MATTHEWS, Richard. An Empirical Critique of “Interrogational” Torture. Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 43 No. 4, 457–470, Winter 2012.
OTTERMAN, Michael. American Torture. From the Cold War to Abu Ghraib and Beyond. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2007.
PARRY, John T. Understanding torture - law, violence, and political identity. 2010.
POSNER, Eric; VERMEULE, Adrian. Should Coercive Interrogation Be Legal? 104 Michigan Law Review 671, 2006.
POSNER, Eric; VERMEULE, Adrian. Terror in the balance. Security, Liberty, and the Courts. Oxford University Press, 2007.
POSNER, Richard. “Not a Suicide Pact” – Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. Oxford University Press, 2006.
REJALI, Darius. Torture and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
SCHIEMANN, John. W. Does Torture Work? New York: Oxford U. Press, 2016.
SCHIEMANN, John. Interrogational Torture: Or How Good Guys Get Bad Information with Ugly Methods. Political Research Quarterly 65(1) 3–19. University of Utah. DOI: 10.1177/1065912911430670, 2012.
SHUE, Henry. Torture in Dreamland: Disposing of the Ticking Bomb. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, v. 37, 2, 231, 2006.
SHUE, Henry. Torture. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 124-143, 1978.
SONDEREGGER, Linus. Torture and the fight against terrorism. Crime Law Soc Change 62:337–353, 2014.
STRAUSS, Marcy. The Lessons of Abu Ghraib. Ohio St. Law Jnl, Vol. 66:1269, 2005.
STRAUSS, Marcy. Torture. New York Law School Law Review, vol. 48, 2003.
TINDALE, Christopher W. Tragic Choices: Reaffirming Absolutes in the Torture Debate. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19:2. ISSN 0738-098X. pp. 209–222, 2005.
UN. Committee against Torture publishes findings on France, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Philippines, Israel. 57 Session, 18 Apr 2016 - 13 May 2016.
UNITED STATES SENATE. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program. Findings and Conclusions, 2014.
USA. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Memorandum for William J. Haynes II. Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees. January 9, 2002a.
USA. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Memorandum for The President. Application of The Geneva Conventions on The Prisoners of War to the Conflict with Al Qaeda and the Taliban. January 25, 2002b.
USA. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Memorandum for Alberto Gonzales. Standards of conduct for interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340-2340A. August 1, 2002c.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Torture, Terror, and Trade-Off s - Philosophy for the White House. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2020-12-14

Como Citar

Jacarandá, R. (2020). Repensando a tortura: uma crítica foucaultiana à justificação da tortura-interrogatório. Aufklärung: Journal of Philosophy, 7(esp), p.51–64. https://doi.org/10.18012/arf.v7iesp.55292